http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50425
Ganga Jaiswal grj017 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #23 from Carrot carrot at google dot com 2011-09-16 06:57:15 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #21)
All callee saved registers should never changed after function call. Here fp
has been changed is not because it is after a function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com 2011-09-16
07:12:52 UTC ---
You asked where do I get such an enormous amount of invalid fortran code.
Probably I was too terse in my answer.
I created invalid codes to check corner or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com 2011-09-16
07:22:09 UTC ---
If you add
character(9) s
s=2.ip.8
gfortran, and g95, compile successfully.
On the contrary gfortran fails to parse
write(6,fmt=2.ip.8)
To me, it looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16 07:30:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
You asked where do I get such an enormous amount of invalid fortran code.
Probably I was too terse in my answer.
Ok, I get it.
I created
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Bug #: 50428
Summary: Consider changing semantics of +initialize so that it
is inherited
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
08:33:30 UTC ---
Quickdirty workaround for this problem:
Index: lto-symtab.c
===
--- lto-symtab.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
08:36:23 UTC ---
With workaround I attached to PR50383 I can now build libsvx (and I did not try
to get further, with bit of luck it will just work ;)
W/o lto:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
09:34:31 UTC ---
As documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
Avoid polluting the global namespace by inclusion of unistd.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
09:44:21 UTC ---
your final version exits immediately using 4.6.1, but not with 4.5
although it might finish eventually I do think this can be considered a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
09:48:11 UTC ---
Now it dies at
/abuild/jh/trunk-install/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: hidden symbol 'typeinfo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
10:10:45 UTC ---
OK, I guess the problem is that we don't stream initializer of extern
variables. This leads to Martin's new devirtualization code to no longer be
able to get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
10:14:09 UTC ---
BTW we find only 1 devirtualization case on sfx:
evans:/abuild/jh/libreoffice/:[0]# grep known target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
Bug #: 50429
Summary: LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code
for OpenMP program...
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50427
--- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-09-16 10:25:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 25302
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25302
Potential fix for problem
As far as I can tell, IRA misses this because it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #1 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:29:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 25303
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25303
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #2 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:31:14
UTC ---
sorry, I put a wrong test program.
The newer is right.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
Bug #: 50430
Summary: Constructors of static external vars are throwed away
leading to missed optimizations (and ipa-cp ICE).
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:36:21
UTC ---
It's my fault.
I think this is not libgomp and lto issue, and that's the libpthread's problem.
Close it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
11:02:07 UTC ---
PR50430 now tracks the svx2 issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
Bug #: 50431
Summary: lambda bug for array size def
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #1 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:36:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25304
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25304
lambda for array size def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #2 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:40:42 UTC ---
BUG1:
auto sz = []()-constexpr long { return 100L; };
int arr[sz()];
Why constexpr for lambda won't be compiled? Can i not use auto type for a
lambda variant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432
Bug #: 50432
Summary: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in
cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173
when build Qt4.7.4 rcc
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-09-16 12:44:37 UTC ---
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 07:22:09AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
To me, it looks like the parser does not handle correctly the format
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
13:47:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
BUG1:
auto sz = []()-constexpr long { return 100L; };
int arr[sz()];
Why constexpr for lambda won't be compiled? Can i not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433
Bug #: 50433
Summary: [4.7 Regression] acats tests FAIL: c460010 on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50434
Bug #: 50434
Summary: genmodes.c hardcodes size of CCmode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432
--- Comment #1 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 14:08:45
UTC ---
Created attachment 25305
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25305
-v output log
Add -v output log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
Bug #: 50435
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)?
scan-tree-dump-times slp basic block vectorized using
SLP 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
14:40:14 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Sep 16 14:40:06 2011
New Revision: 178908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178908
Log:
PR lto/50430
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-16
14:41:19 UTC ---
I have done a clean bootstrap of powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 with the patch in comment #5 with all languages except
go.
I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-09-16 14:42:31 UTC ---
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:44:37PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
14:45:07 UTC ---
With fix I commited for PR50430 and the workaround for PR50383 my build dies on
java modules. I believe it is the problem we run into with Michael on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
15:02:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 25306
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25306
testcase
One will need to revert the gimple-fold.c patch mentioned above to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265
--- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-16 15:42:15 UTC ---
This pr (as well as pr49006) seems to have been fixed between revisions 176696
and 177649. I am closing
pr49006 as fixed and I'll use this pr to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
basic block
vectorized using SLP 1
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes4
# of unexpected failures2
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes8
# of unexpected failures4
/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc version 4.7.0 20110916 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-16 16:18:37 UTC
---
Well, at least the loop is not vectorized now :).
Could you please attach the slp dump (-fdump-tree-slp-details)?
Thanks,
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
--- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-16 17:27:27 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.6.0.
Am I allowed/able to mark this RESOLVED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-16
17:37:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 25307
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25307
slp dump attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libgomp.h:87:5: error: |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50358
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
18:27:16 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 16 18:27:10 2011
New Revision: 178912
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178912
Log:
PR target/50358
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50358
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436
Bug #: 50436
Summary: Crash or hang on invalid template code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436
--- Comment #1 from Zack Weinberg zackw at panix dot com 2011-09-16 19:13:13
UTC ---
Here's a variant that hangs.
template bool struct VI {};
template typename T
struct IP
{
static const bool r = IPT::r;
};
template typename T
struct V
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Bug #: 50437
Summary: [C++0x] [4.7 regression] ICE for trivial use of lambda
in template function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
--- Comment #8 from Jordan DeLong delong.j at fb dot com 2011-09-16 20:12:43
UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438
Bug #: 50438
Summary: proc pointer to subroutine in structure constructors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
Bug #: 50439
Summary: gfortran infinite loop with -floop-interchange
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50440
Bug #: 50440
Summary: 128 bit unsigned int subtraction generates too many
register moves
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
21:13:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:13:42 2011
New Revision: 178917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178917
Log:
PR c++/50424
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
21:16:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:16:16 2011
New Revision: 178918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178918
Log:
PR c++/50424
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16
21:24:30 UTC ---
It seems postreload.c should be changed to the following to avoid combining
--- postreload.c(revision 178904)
+++ postreload.c(working copy)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
--- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-09-16 22:00:25 UTC
---
Verified this also happens on trunk with g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 20110914-1) 4.7.0
20110914 (experimental) [trunk revision 178863]. Tried it with and without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping pipping at exherbo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #6 from Elias Pipping pipping at exherbo dot org 2011-09-16
22:08:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25308
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25308
reduction for gcc 4.6.1
I used gcc 4.5 during reduction, assuming that a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #1 from Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail dot com 2011-09-17
00:31:43 UTC ---
Still failing in r178925.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50441
Bug #: 50441
Summary: [C++0x] type_traits is missing GNU extension types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
Bug #: 50442
Summary: Constructing T from implicit conversion to T
ambiguous in C++0x mode, not C++98
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
72 matches
Mail list logo
