[Bug tree-optimization/50412] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 --- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 09:04:24 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Sep 25 09:04:19 2011 New Revision: 179160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179160 Log: PR tree-optimization/50412 *

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #15 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 09:26:03 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Sep 25 09:25:59 2011 New Revision: 179162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179162 Log: PR tree-optimization/50413

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50363] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50363 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24958|0 |1 is

[Bug lto/50383] ICE in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenther at suse dot de|rguenth at

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50416] gfortran -O1 ICE MPFR assertion failed: 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50416 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug middle-end/50426] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -O1 ICE in estimate_function_body_sizes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50426 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/50383] ICE in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-09-25 10:12:47 UTC --- So why doesn't it have DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME set? No idea. I suppose it is not seen by free_lang_data for whatever reason. Honza

[Bug target/50440] 128 bit unsigned int subtraction generates too many register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50440 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug c++/50280] Incorrect type deduced for T when passed a const bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50280 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 10:43:03 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Sep 25 10:43:00 2011 New Revision: 179163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179163 Log: 2011-09-25 Paolo

[Bug c++/50280] Incorrect type deduced for T when passed a const bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50280 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-25 10:54:07 UTC --- Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently well - and after all boils down to adding a warning - but I'm not sure to

[Bug c/50466] Compiled code behaves differently with -O2 -fPIC flag combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50466 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/50463] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-dse leeds to wrong code with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 11:07:48 UTC --- Smells like a Frontend decl merging issue.

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug middle-end/50460] [4.7 Regression] __builtin___strcpy_chk/__builtin_object_size don't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 11:11:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Looking at: const char *str1 = JIHGFEDCBA; #define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, 1))

[Bug tree-optimization/50452] [4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/45581] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45581 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jsm28 at

[Bug c++/40574] -O3 cause segfault in loop in hunspell

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40574 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/38502] static_assert vs. enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38502 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50474] GCC (cc1plus) hangs forever compiling with -O2 (-fcse-follow-jumps)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/50475] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-*

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug testsuite/50485] gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 12:13:44 UTC --- D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRshared [8] struct foo[1] *(D.3058); looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16, as a pointer (of

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24625|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Rafał Mużyło galtgendo at o2 dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-25 12:56:53 UTC --- Indeed 4.5.3 works for me.

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-25 13:30:28 UTC --- Actually I tried 179164, not 4.5.3 proper, sorry. The fix must be very recent, then.

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #9 from Rafał Mużyło galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2011-09-25 13:33:42 UTC --- What I'm trying to say is that gcc should either: - accept the code even with -fno-ipa-cp - reject the code even with -fipa-cp - print better diagnostics, if

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #10 from Rafał Mużyło galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2011-09-25 13:51:14 UTC --- So, I ran one more test: gcc-4.6.1 -O2 -Wall -c -o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.i -fno-align-functions -fno-align-jumps -fno-align-labels

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 13:57:13 UTC --- Probably this change: 2011-09-23 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com Core 253 - allow const objects with no initializer or user-provided

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #6 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com 2011-09-25 14:22:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently well - and after all boils down to

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c++/47791] finish function is using absolute value instead of the #defined one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47791 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-25 14:52:50 UTC --- It seems to me that the SF_* that you are mentioning actually are meant for start_preparsed_function, not for finish_function. The latter should

[Bug c++/45509] program abort after compiled with gcc-4.5.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/42222] GCC ooms when building KDE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 and __int128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40855 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/39778] Using DJGPP to compile CPP file and get failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39778 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/41158] segfault while using PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41158 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/18835] memory consumption is high for C++ testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #1 from John Salmon john.salmon at deshaw dot com 2011-09-25 15:22:07 UTC --- Here's a slightly smaller test case. The problem is the 'movdqa'. According the x86-64 ABI, rsp+8 is 16-bit aligned at the entry to main, and therefore so

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-09-25 15:25:01 UTC --- According to my bisection, the bug started on trunk for 4.5.0 with r147851, stopped on trunk for 4.6.0 with r164136, and stopped on 4.5 branch with r175813. I

[Bug c++/45880] Template-Methode in Shared Object not resolved when compiled with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45880 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/45169] C++ Hello World mudflap violations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45169 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 --- Comment #11 from Evan Martin evan at chromium dot org 2011-09-25 16:02:25 UTC --- I am on personal leave until 2012. If you're within Google, you can read http://www/~evanm/leave.html for more. Otherwise, for Chrome questions you can try

[Bug c++/39699] No error reporting when function and variable have the same name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/39751] ICE in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:342

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-25 16:08:15 UTC --- *** Bug 46858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46858] ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44725] -pedantic should report gcc extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44725 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 --- Comment #2 from Jens Gustedt jens.gustedt at loria dot fr 2011-09-25 16:33:05 UTC --- Just to add to the list, since this finally found some attention. The problem is also manifest for 4.5.2, only the difference is that this time the three

[Bug c++/41995] Incorrect point of instantiation for function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW

[Bug c++/50512] New: surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Bug #: 50512 Summary: surprising change in overloading resolution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-25 16:51:02 UTC --- On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: I'm tempted to close this, then. Comment #4 raises a C issue, however,

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 --- Comment #1 from mm at mezzarobba dot net 2011-09-25 16:51:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25361 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25361 testcase

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/34014] conversion operators misprinted in gimple dump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34014 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/32118] ICE in c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32118 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #12 from Rafał Mużyło galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2011-09-25 18:02:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Does the WONTFIX resolution here mean that glibc will need a fix then ?

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-09-25 18:05:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) * expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Use the new interfaces. I'll continue trying to minimize the changeset. Of

[Bug bootstrap/50513] New: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Bug #: 50513 Summary: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 --- Comment #2 from Roger Meyer fzvqedi at v dot mintemail.com 2011-09-25 19:03:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) i'm using the stock gcc 4.4 that comes with debian 6 i386 compiling gcc 4.5.3 with the following options ./configure

[Bug bootstrap/50513] cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #6 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2011-09-25 19:58:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRshared [8] struct foo[1] *(D.3058); looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16,

[Bug fortran/50514] New: gfortran should check ISHFT ISHFTC aruments (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50514 Bug #: 50514 Summary: gfortran should check ISHFT ISHFTC aruments (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50515] New: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515 Bug #: 50515 Summary: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50516] New: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50516 Bug #: 50516 Summary: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50517] New: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517 Bug #: 50517 Summary: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2011-09-25 20:24:24 UTC --- Gerald has provided a fix for the _Unwind_FindTableEntry FreeBSD ia64 issue (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45650). With this fix, 4.7 on

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2011-09-25 20:25:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25362 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25362 libgcc config.log from ia64 FreeBSD

[Bug c++/42844] const variable requires initializer / no explicitly declared default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const

[Bug c++/20039] uninitialized const in `new' of `const struct'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const

[Bug c++/50518] New: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 Bug #: 50518 Summary: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >