[Bug tree-optimization/50698] New: pretending to create versioning for alias when not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 Bug #: 50698 Summary: pretending to create versioning for alias when not required Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/50699] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 179820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50699 Bug #: 50699 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 179820 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/50699] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 179820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50699 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/50700] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50700 Bug #: 50700 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50700] [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50700 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/49939] [avr] Skip 2-word instructions if applicable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49939 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 09:59:34 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Oct 12 09:59:30 2011 New Revision: 179843 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179843 Log: PR target/49939 *

[Bug target/49939] [avr] Skip 2-word instructions if applicable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49939 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50346] Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++

[Bug bootstrap/50697] gcc compile fails when gmp is in non-standard location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50697 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 10:53:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) ./configure --prefix=/swadm/local CFLAGS=-fPIC -I/swadm/local/include LDFLAGS=-L/swadm/local/lib

[Bug c++/49777] for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at

[Bug bootstrap/50699] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 179820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50699 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50698] pretending to create versioning for alias when not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias,

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-12 11:31:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Created attachment 25466 [details] test of -fstack-check a simple test program for Darwin .. .. AFAICT this DTRT under

[Bug c/50695] double comparison broken after computation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50695 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-12 11:40:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Would you please try and reproduce the failure with a Linux target? What for? AFAICT the failure occurs only on

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 11:44:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #11) Created attachment 25466 [details] test of -fstack-check a simple test program for Darwin .. ..

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-12 11:55:33 UTC --- Created attachment 25471 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25471 Assembly file for the code in attachment 25466 if it's aborting,

[Bug c/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 11:56:06 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Oct 12 11:56:03 2011 New Revision: 179845 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179845 Log: PR c/50565 *

[Bug c/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 --- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 11:57:39 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Oct 12 11:57:36 2011 New Revision: 179846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179846 Log: PR c/50565 *

[Bug c/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 11:58:52 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Oct 12 11:58:47 2011 New Revision: 179847 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179847 Log: PR c/50565 *

[Bug c/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25466|0 |1 is

[Bug tree-optimization/50346] Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Johnson scovich at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 12:40:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, it's a tree optimization issue. It's simple - the local aggregate f escapes the function via the member function call to baz:

[Bug tree-optimization/50346] Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 12:44:15 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, scovich at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Johnson scovich

[Bug libstdc++/50701] New: Pair and string constructor copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50701 Bug #: 50701 Summary: Pair and string constructor copy Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 3.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/50701] Pair and string constructor copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50701 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:09:59 UTC --- Created attachment 25473 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25473 unreduced testcase

[Bug middle-end/50700] [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50700 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:19:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 12 13:19:34 2011 New Revision: 179850 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179850 Log: 2011-10-12 Richard

[Bug middle-end/50700] [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50700 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:22:18 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 12 13:22:12 2011 New Revision: 179851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179851 Log: 2011-10-12 Richard

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:35:05 UTC --- built with ; $ gnatmake -f -O2 -gnatws -fstack-check -I../../../support c52104y --GCC=/GCC/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/xgcc -B/GCC/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc -cargs

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:47:32 UTC --- rax0x1010 268435472 rbx0x7fff5fbff380 140734799803264 rcx0x7fff5bc00380 140734732698496 rdx

[Bug tree-optimization/50702] New: [4.7 Regression] 20020210-1.c:2:22: ICE: gimple_op, at gimple.h:1704. at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50702 Bug #: 50702 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 20020210-1.c:2:22: ICE: gimple_op, at gimple.h:1704. at -O1 and above Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #12 from Paul Koning pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 14:04:30 UTC --- You said GCC treats types compatible when they have the same precision. That's where the problem lies, because enums with -fstrict-enums have their precision

[Bug tree-optimization/50702] [4.7 Regression] 20020210-1.c:2:22: ICE: gimple_op, at gimple.h:1704. at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50702 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 14:05:04 UTC --- Also, FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/nested-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/nested-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) fail

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 14:07:45 UTC --- Created attachment 25474 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25474 optimized tree dump for c52104y shows the builtin_alloca_with_align

[Bug middle-end/50629] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vect-shuffle-2.c with ICE on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50629 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 14:15:56 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #12 from Paul Koning

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 14:21:48 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse

[Bug middle-end/50700] [4.6/4.7 Regression] __builtin_object_size computed wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50700 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50702] [4.7 Regression] 20020210-1.c:2:22: ICE: gimple_op, at gimple.h:1704. at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50702 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at

[Bug tree-optimization/50698] pretending to create versioning for alias when not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 14:40:55 UTC --- Patch: Index: gcc/tree-data-ref.c === --- gcc/tree-data-ref.c (revision 179849) +++

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 14:54:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Would you please try and reproduce the failure with a Linux target? [Setting up Darwin GCC development environment (especially

[Bug tree-optimization/50419] Bad interaction between data-ref and disambiguation with restrict pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 --- Comment #2 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 15:09:53 UTC --- Meeh, since the fix for PR49279 we don't retain the casts to restrict anymore, making the testcase not work even with the fix.

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 15:13:04 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 12 15:12:58 2011 New Revision: 179856 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179856 Log: 2011-10-12 Paul

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.2

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 15:16:17 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 12 15:16:14 2011 New Revision: 179857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179857 Log: 2011-10-12 Paul

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 15:19:54 UTC --- Yeah, maybe we can just throw them away with -O3. Or decay them (on BB merging) to # DEBUG user_label: that exposes the label to more code motion

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 --- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 15:19:54 UTC --- No, I no longer see the failure on PowerPC, for the reduced testcase or the full benchmark.

[Bug tree-optimization/49279] [4.5 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/50703] New: std::stringstream not thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703 Bug #: 50703 Summary: std::stringstream not thread-safe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/50703] std::stringstream not thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703 --- Comment #1 from hoenle2...@kayser-threde.com 2011-10-12 15:36:50 UTC --- Created attachment 25475 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25475 debugger screenshot

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-12 15:37:46 UTC --- --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 13:08:48 UTC --- The reghunt is not yet complete, but the

[Bug middle-end/50704] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Bug #: 50704 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libstdc++/50703] std::stringstream not thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/50239] compiled program segfault when -O0 is used to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50239 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50705] New: Wrong assembly generated in ppc 476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705 Bug #: 50705 Summary: Wrong assembly generated in ppc 476 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug c++/50364] Volatile miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50364 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug c++/15339] [DR217] Adding default arguments to function templates in redeclarations should be forbidden

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyasskin

[Bug c++/48372] Missed error for redundant default argument on template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48372 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48075] infinite loop when compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48075 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 16:27:34 UTC --- For me it works, too. There are no ICEs any more for avr-unknown-none and the test cases mentioned in comment #0.

[Bug c/50705] Wrong assembly generated in ppc 476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705 SK santoshkumar.a at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 16:46:23 UTC --- This doesn't seem to happen with a cross compiler :( When you say in stage 2, do you mean the stage 1 compiler is crashing, or the stage 2 compiler is

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-12 16:53:32 UTC --- --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 16:46:23 UTC --- This doesn't seem to happen with a

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tema at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50698] pretending to create versioning for alias when not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-10-12 17:00:40 UTC --- the patch work for me. Does not seem to break anything else. thanks

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:01:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should run these tests only on 64-bit

[Bug c++/40825] mis-optimization of libstdc++'s atomic.cc:__atomic_flag_wait_explicit() at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40825 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:00:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should run these tests only on 64-bit architectures to get the correct

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #5 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:03:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Ah! It happens because the underlying architecture is 32-bit. We should

[Bug c++/40695] bogus may be used uninitialized in this function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40695 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50706] New: Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706 Bug #: 50706 Summary: Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921) Classification: Unclassified

[Bug middle-end/50706] Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:10:15 UTC --- Created attachment 25476 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25476 Small testcase

[Bug middle-end/50706] Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:10:51 UTC --- Created attachment 25477 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25477 Backtrace

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/50699] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 179820

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50699 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:21:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Looks like a minor oversight in r179820. I am testing the following on *-darwin9. allows bootstrap to complete on *-darwin9 and

[Bug target/50705] Wrong assembly generated in ppc 476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/36812] ICE: verify_stmts failed with -O -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36812 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/35606] Unresolved #pragma weak prevents all function aliasing in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35606 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:36:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) So if I want to run the test only on 64-bit architectures, then lp64 is the correct choice in dg-require-effective-target? Artem.

[Bug c/50695] double comparison broken after computation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50695 --- Comment #11 from rickyrockrat gpib at rickyrockrat dot net 2011-10-12 17:40:25 UTC --- Richard, The original issue involved strtof, with -Wall enabled in the Makefile, and stdlib.h included. That is the case that brought all this up, and that

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #7 from Artem Shinkarov tema at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 17:45:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) So if I want to run the test only on 64-bit architectures, then lp64 is the correct choice in

[Bug middle-end/50704] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/warn-vect-op-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50704 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 17:58:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) I need to make sure that UNITS_PER_WORD is 8 on the architecture I am running the test. Is it the case for x32? Yes.

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 18:04:00 UTC --- It turns out that Tom's patch is innocent, you can reproduce the problem at the preceding revision if you compiled at -O1 instead of -O2. This appears to

[Bug target/49967] The -static-libstdc++ does not work on HP-UX (IA64 B.11.23, probably others)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 18:07:29 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Wed Oct 12 18:07:25 2011 New Revision: 179862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179862 Log: 2011-10-12 Steve Ellcey

[Bug target/49967] The -static-libstdc++ does not work on HP-UX (IA64 B.11.23, probably others)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967 Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #23 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 18:41:03 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 12 18:40:58 2011 New Revision: 179863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179863 Log: 2011-10-12

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50659] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [F03] ICE with PROCEDURE statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 18:53:59 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Oct 12 18:53:55 2011 New Revision: 179864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179864 Log: 2011-10-12 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 19:16:01 UTC --- I'll check, however I don't see the fix for 50326 applied to the 4.6 branch.

[Bug c++/26654] pointers to 16-byte aligned ints are rejected in member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26654 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/27100] ICE with multiple friend declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/27100] ICE with multiple friend declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27100 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/50684] Incorrect error for move_alloc on element inside intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 19:52:57 UTC --- Some carryover form PR50570, where I proposed a draft patch: Index: gcc/fortran/check.c === ---

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 19:57:15 UTC --- reproducible (using gdb 7.1) on darwin9 @ m64 (m32 is OK on D9 and D10) - - so where are we looking for a problem- in the m64 libgcc_s unwinder - or in the ada

[Bug target/49740] [4.7 Regression] powerpc native bootstrap with -O3 produces Bootstrap comparison failure!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740 --- Comment #5 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2011-10-12 20:03:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Yep, it's still broken (gcc-4.7-20111008). Configure line: ./gcc-v4.7-20111008.sourcedir/configure --prefix=/usr

  1   2   >