http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
20:59:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 20:59:28 2011
New Revision: 182264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182264
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
21:00:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 21:00:36 2011
New Revision: 182265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182265
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51495
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21617
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12 21:25:58 UTC ---
f1.c vs. f.c:
...
int g(int*);int g(int*);
int f1(void) |int f(void)
{{
int tt = 0; int tt = 0;
int t = 4;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12 21:33:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 26061
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26061
tentative patch
Using this tentative patch, now also f in f.c.149t.optimized has 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 21:43:15 UTC ---
Recent GCC 4.7.0 works with both testcases. GCC 4.6.3 still fails on the 1st.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48427
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 21:43:38 UTC ---
I can't reproduce the bug with recent GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
Bug #: 51517
Summary: [4.4 regression ] Wrong debug information for pointers
with negative strides.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51518
Bug #: 51518
Summary: ICE: in expand_call, at calls.c:3421 with
-mno-accumulate-outgoing-args and __attribute__
((ms_abi)) (after sorry)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-12
22:08:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
As far as I could observe it, this is mainly triggered by the following in
sh_legitimate_index_p:
+ if (mode == QImode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51519
Bug #: 51519
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:1410 with -O
-fno-guess-branch-probability -findirect-inlining
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520
Bug #: 51520
Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Bug #: 51521
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building
libstdc++-v3: verify_flow_info failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
Bug #: 51522
Summary: ICE in gfortran 4.6.2, x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51515
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51506
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Bug #: 51523
Summary: LTO keeps unneeded functions (mingw32 target)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50578
zihao.jiang zihao.jiang at sinobot dot com.cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
Yuehai Du duyuehai at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||duyuehai at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #3 from Yuehai Du duyuehai at gmail dot com 2011-12-13 04:16:22
UTC ---
Hi Richard
would it be ok if i submit a patch like this to fix this bug:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
Bug #: 51524
Summary: [BMI2] New regression on 182266 vs 182257
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51525
Bug #: 51525
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info_failed in
g++.dg/abi/covariant5.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51525
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-12-13 07:29:54
UTC ---
Also fails with some other g++.dg/abi/covariantX.C testcases [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-12/msg01368.html
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
