http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51714
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739
Bug #: 51739
Summary: g++ cpp compiler crash with -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51714
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739
--- Comment #1 from Tim tim6502 at gmail dot com 2012-01-03 08:39:34 UTC ---
# command to reproduce
tgraham@kepler:~/tmp$ g++ -O3 -c reduced_test_case.i.cxx -o reduced_test_case.o
g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
08:45:59 UTC ---
That looks like another fallout from having -fpic in picflag.m4. So I'll remove
the s390*-*-* case in picflag.m4:
s390*-*-*)
$1=-fpic
;;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
08:53:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Is the segfault in the
for (;;)
{
if ((*mem_chain)-elt == v)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
08:59:26 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 08:59:21 2012
New Revision: 182830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182830
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51739
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
09:09:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 3 09:09:41 2012
New Revision: 182832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182832
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15867
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-03 09:33:37 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 3 09:33:33 2012
New Revision: 182833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182833
Log:
/cp
2012-01-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15867
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15369
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39456
--- Comment #4 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2012-01-03 09:53:59 UTC ---
Thanks for looking at my reports and happy new year!
I think the problem I had was the quoting and string concat, you need:
void fct2 (void)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #3 from niXman i.nixman at gmail dot com 2012-01-03 09:53:59 UTC
---
Created attachment 26229
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26229
sources + temp files + logs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23211
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
10:18:12 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00046.html
Deferring for 4.8.
We should also add ASSERT_EXPRs e.g. for
unsigned int x;
int D.1234;
D.1234_2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-03
10:21:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I can reproduce it with
-O -m32
on x86-64-linux.
Fine you can reproduce it easily.
In terms of code validity, there are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
11:30:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 11:30:27 2012
New Revision: 182835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182835
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51092
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3, 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
11:54:58 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 11:54:53 2012
New Revision: 182838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182838
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47819
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
12:07:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 12:07:18 2012
New Revision: 182839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182839
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
12:11:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 12:11:41 2012
New Revision: 182840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182840
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48571
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49693
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
12:36:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Testing this patch:
which doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2012-01-03 13:06:50
UTC ---
You can just set enable_static=no early in libstdc++-v3/configure.ac. It will
still install libstdc++-v3.a, which is a bit ugly, but that's quite hard to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:08:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:07:57 2012
New Revision: 182841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182841
Log:
2011-05-18 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:15:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:15:21 2012
New Revision: 182842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182842
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:19:35 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:19:28 2012
New Revision: 182843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182843
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 13:24:12 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:24:04 2012
New Revision: 182844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182844
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51269
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50966
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||belyshev at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:29:56 UTC ---
It's also questionable to cause new warnings to appear on the branch if
you consider code using -Werror. Leaving open a bit for further consideration,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51269
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:45:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:45:41 2012
New Revision: 182845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182845
Log:
PR pch/51722
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
--- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
13:54:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:54:44 2012
New Revision: 182846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182846
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51740
Bug #: 51740
Summary: warning is used uninitialized in this function is
missing if the variable initialized later
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51042
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
14:46:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 14:46:03 2012
New Revision: 182848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182848
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
15:00:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Uhm, is it simply that cp_parser_postfix_open_square_expression doesn't
handle:
postfix-expression [ braced-init-list ]
or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
Bug #: 51741
Summary: complicatet brakets wont compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||szo at szo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51740
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #2 from stfuthnk digsag at web dot de 2012-01-03 15:21:26 UTC ---
I fail secon one. forgot a * -.-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #3 from stfuthnk digsag at web dot de 2012-01-03 15:23:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
as soon as you cast the .where pointer to some other type it converts to
an rvalue. Use (knot*)(where) instead of (knot *)(...where).
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
15:25:32 UTC ---
The bug reporting guidelines at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ ask for the following
which you have not provided:
* the exact version of gcc
* the exact command
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
15:28:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 3 15:28:19 2012
New Revision: 182850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182850
Log:
2012-01-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-03 15:29:47 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 3 15:29:42 2012
New Revision: 182851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182851
Log:
/cp
2012-01-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29273
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #5 from stfuthnk digsag at web dot de 2012-01-03 15:47:08 UTC ---
yeah i just realised how the second one was a fail of my side.
but I didn't realze the rvalue lvalue stuff.
thanx for the help, and please don't go all pissed off I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
15:53:13 UTC ---
noone's insulted and noone's flaming, but in future please follow the bug
reporting guidelines (and maybe check with someone who knows C well before
assuming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
16:24:00 UTC ---
Managed to reproduce this even using x86_64-linux - ia64-linux cross.
Indeed, what happens is that when add_mem_for_addr is called, mem_elt is still
its own
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51742
Bug #: 51742
Summary: 4.6.2 v. HP-UX 11.11, PA-RISC: make bootstrap-lean
fails: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(In function '__fixunssfdi')
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41596
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-03
16:37:07 UTC ---
Iain, what's going on with this issue? Are there patches on the mailing list
waiting to be reviewed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51666
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39796
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes50
# of unexpected failures14
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 224
/home/uros/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.7.0 20120103 (experimental) [trunk
revision 182829] (GCC)
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo