http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
--- Comment #8 from Markus Schöpflin markus.schoepflin at comsoft dot de
2012-03-14 08:28:45 UTC ---
4.6.0 and 4.6.1 still fail, see comments #3 #6. Unfortunately I can't adjust
'known to fail'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52521
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
08:30:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:30:23 2012
New Revision: 185375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185375
Log:
PR c++/52521
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-14 09:35:12 UTC ---
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, ian at airs dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52134
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-14 09:39:31 UTC ---
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52134
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43768
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-14 09:39:55 UTC ---
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43768
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:41:29 UTC ---
Does
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
--- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 185376)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52566
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:46:54 UTC ---
If you want to use #pragma once the simplest solution might be to put a unique
comment in each file, with e.g. just the filename, or a description of its
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-03-14 10:47:50
UTC ---
This is apparently causing bug 52573.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52578
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:51:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 10:51:34 2012
New Revision: 185378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185378
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:52:18 UTC ---
I can see some value in the base class case too, but whether it's useless
depends on context, here the exact same casts are not redundant because they
select
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:55:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 10:55:09 2012
New Revision: 185379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185379
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:55:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 10:55:09 2012
New Revision: 185379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185379
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
10:55:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 10:55:09 2012
New Revision: 185379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185379
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52578
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
11:11:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 26889
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26889
main.s: FSF Assembler output
Here is the assembler output of the main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
Bug #: 52583
Summary: Several new go testsuite failues on Solaris
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-14
11:47:30 UTC ---
Indeed, I was vaguely considering similar things..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
12:54:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 26890
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26890
mulhisi.c:Test program
Test program showing that the non-FSF patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52584
Bug #: 52584
Summary: Fails to constant fold vector upper/lower half
BIT_FIELD_REFs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
13:00:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 13:00:44 2012
New Revision: 185380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185380
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
13:01:52 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 13:01:46 2012
New Revision: 185381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185381
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
13:03:54 UTC ---
Note: The assembler code in attachment 26890 is from
30-gcc-4.5.1-fixedpoint-3-4-2010.patch
http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/avr-gcc/gcc-4.5.1
Fortran (GCC) 4.8.0 20120314 (experimental) [trunk revision 185372]
$ cat p_assoc.f90
module m0
abstract interface
subroutine sub
end subroutine sub
end interface
interface
subroutine s(ss)
import sub
procedure(sub), pointer, intent(in) :: ss
end subroutine s
end interface
end module m0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #16 from PierreC pchwood at yahoo dot com 2012-03-14 13:42:13 UTC
---
I bumped into this problem using f2py to interface a Fortran library into
Python.
The read statement upon an internal buffer depends on the locale...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
Bug #: 52586
Summary: libgo fails to build for mipsel64-linux-gnu (reference
to undefined name 'SYS_GETDENTS64')
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:21:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 14:21:12 2012
New Revision: 185383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185383
Log:
PR c++/52582
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:24:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 14:24:32 2012
New Revision: 185384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185384
Log:
PR c++/52582
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52585
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:32:49 UTC ---
Confirmed, 4.7 does
418: LOOP VECTORIZED.
398: LOOP VECTORIZED.
335: LOOP VECTORIZED.
316: LOOP VECTORIZED.
280: LOOP VECTORIZED.
262: LOOP VECTORIZED.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52585
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:41:05 UTC ---
I think one needs something like the following for both the first and the
second argument.
if (arg1-expr-symtree-n.sym-attr.proc_pointer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:52:11 UTC ---
The issue is that with the artificial access functions added for
__BLNK__.uold and __BLK__.vnew we run the subscript dependence tester
but that fails even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52584
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
14:55:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 14:55:11 2012
New Revision: 185385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185385
Log:
2012-03-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52587
Bug #: 52587
Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3355: array with one
element
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52588
Bug #: 52588
Summary: false warning: array subscript is above array bounds:
number of elements is 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589
Bug #: 52589
Summary: VRP missed optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
16:12:35 UTC ---
Temporarily worked around for 4.7.0. We really should find out why we aren't
setting DECL_EXTERNAL on this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
17:24:30 UTC ---
The problem is in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, we have
s_7 = ASSERT_EXPR s_1(D), s_1(D) + 1879048192 = 4026531839;
D.1721_3 = s_7 + 2147483648;
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
18:00:33 UTC ---
I wouldn't warn about a cast that changes the type or value category of an
expression at all, or a cast that ends up being the same type as the result of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
18:33:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 26893
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26893
patch
Does this fix it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
18:44:32 UTC ---
On this testcase? Yes, it does. Haven't done bootstrap/regtest with it
though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-03-14 19:27:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
--- FAIL: log.TestAll (0.02 seconds)
log_test.go:66: log output should match
^.*/[A-Za-z0-9_\\-]+\\.go:(54|56):
hello 23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
Bug #: 52590
Summary: std::thread Segmentation fault static linking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14 21:02:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
What's different with --disable-bootstrap? Missing linker plugin support?
I did a reference build, bootstrap and nobootstrap, and the test passed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
Bug #: 52591
Summary: [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] moving std::vector relies on
movable elements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
21:10:38 UTC ---
After that, I tested an tail-merge (AFAIK unrelated) patch on top of the same
sources, and now the test fails for both:
With exactly the same invocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14 21:28:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
After that, I tested an tail-merge (AFAIK unrelated) patch on top of the
same
sources, and now the test fails for both:
With exactly the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
--- Comment #2 from Jason Toffaletti jason at cornsyrup dot org 2012-03-14
21:29:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
-static
You need to make sure all of libpthread.a is included, right it does not get
linked that way.
This is not a GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
22:20:23 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 14 22:20:17 2012
New Revision: 185396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185396
Log:
Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14
22:58:05 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Mar 14 22:57:58 2012
New Revision: 185397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185397
Log:
PR target/49468
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
Joe Hermaszewski expipiplus1 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-14
23:46:59 UTC ---
You bet it ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
00:36:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Jon, can you have a look? I suspect it's just matter of telling apart cases in
the move-assignment operator at compile time with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
00:51:23 UTC ---
The allocator-aware container requirements (table 99) state that move-assigning
a vector requires that the element type be MoveAssignable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
00:58:15 UTC ---
std::vector did not conform to the C++11 allocator-aware container requirements
in 4.6, now it does, so you can't use a non-MoveAssignable type as the element
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-15
01:01:36 UTC ---
I see. That conforming extension seems nice to have, anyway, I agree (together
with 2103)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
01:20:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 26895
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26895
barely tested patch that allows testcase to compile
here's a prototype,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |enhancement
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
--- Comment #3 from Jason Toffaletti jason at cornsyrup dot org 2012-03-15
04:14:40 UTC ---
$ g++-4.7 -Wl,-M -v -static -pthread -std=c++0x -o thread thread.cc shows all
of libpthread being linked.
With a bit more digging I traced the problem to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-15
04:47:07 UTC ---
IMHO, the whole point of -ffast-math is to trade precision for speed, so the
use of fsca makes sense to me, but I wouldn't mind if we no longer used it for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-03-15 05:27:03
UTC ---
What's failing is not Printf or Println, but the filename and line number.
Those are retrieved using DWARF lookup on the PC, and evidently something is
going
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
Bug #: 52592
Summary: mplayer compilation failure with undefined reference
to `__builtin_iround'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593
Bug #: 52593
Summary: Builtin sqrt on x86 is not correctly rounded
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
76 matches
Mail list logo
