[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

2012-07-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 08:24:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) I think a tool to merge would be a good partial solution. We will go with the tool solution. I'll take care of the tool before

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

2012-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/54020] [c++0x] incorrectly accepted constexpr functions

2012-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54020 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/53654] move constructor incorrectly delete copy constructor defined by template

2012-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53654 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53786] [C++11] alias template causes g++ segfault

2012-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map 3x slower than 4.6.2

2012-07-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-07-25 09:56:15 UTC --- A patch is available here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2012-07/msg00051.html Submitter and interested people can give it a try before it goes

[Bug c++/54090] New: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731

2012-07-25 Thread dicomj23 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090 Bug #: 54090 Summary: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/54091] New: internal compiler error in class method with many string objects

2012-07-25 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091 Bug #: 54091 Summary: internal compiler error in class method with many string objects Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54091] internal compiler error in class method with many string objects

2012-07-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 11:35:00 UTC --- Have you tried with a current release, 4.6 or 4.7? The 4.4 release series is closed and no longer maintained.

[Bug bootstrap/54092] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 while building Ada at stage 1

2012-07-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54092 Bug #: 54092 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10 while building Ada at stage 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/48026] #pragma optimize ignored for C++

2012-07-25 Thread linux at carewolf dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026 Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linux at carewolf

[Bug c++/54020] [c++0x] incorrectly accepted constexpr functions

2012-07-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54020 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/54092] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails while building Ada at stage 1

2012-07-25 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54092 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |

[Bug c++/54020] [c++0x] incorrectly accepted constexpr functions

2012-07-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54020 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 14:57:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 25 14:56:57 2012 New Revision: 189851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189851 Log: PR c++/54020 *

[Bug c++/54086] GCC should allow constexpr and const together

2012-07-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54086 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 14:57:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 25 14:57:06 2012 New Revision: 189852 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189852 Log: PR c++/54086 *

[Bug c++/54020] [c++0x] incorrectly accepted constexpr functions

2012-07-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54020 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/54092] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails while building Ada at stage 1

2012-07-25 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54092 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 15:10:53 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jul 25 15:10:44 2012 New Revision: 189853 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189853 Log: PR bootstrap/54092

[Bug bootstrap/54092] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails while building Ada at stage 1

2012-07-25 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54092 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54086] GCC should allow constexpr and const together

2012-07-25 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54086 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54093] New: ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2129

2012-07-25 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093 Bug #: 54093 Summary: ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2129 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/54094] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in graphite-dependences.c:320 : isl_constraint.c:497: position out of bounds

2012-07-25 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
(GCC) version 4.8.0 20120725 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin) compiled by GNU C version 4.8.0 20120725 (experimental), GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.2.0-dev, MPC version 0.9 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 ignoring duplicate directory /usr/include

[Bug regression/54084] Bunch of fails for x86

2012-07-25 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54084 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt

[Bug libstdc++/54036] Negating a DFP NAN in C++ produces NAN not -NAN

2012-07-25 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54036 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 17:02:39 UTC --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Jul 25 17:02:27 2012 New Revision: 189857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189857 Log: Backport prospective

[Bug lto/54095] New: Unnecessary static variable renaming

2012-07-25 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 Bug #: 54095 Summary: Unnecessary static variable renaming Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

2012-07-25 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at

[Bug target/53633] __attribute__((naked)) should disable -Wreturn-type

2012-07-25 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 18:08:11 UTC --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jul 25 18:08:06 2012 New Revision: 189860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189860 Log: 2012-07-25 Sandra Loosemore

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

2012-07-25 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 --- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 18:26:18 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Wed Jul 25 18:26:12 2012 New Revision: 189861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189861 Log: 2012-07-25 Marc Glisse

[Bug fortran/54096] New: Type bound procedures

2012-07-25 Thread badass at vt dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 Bug #: 54096 Summary: Type bound procedures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/54090] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731

2012-07-25 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54090] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731

2012-07-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
reconfirmed||2012-07-25 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-25 18:56:57 UTC --- Confirmed on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, with: gcc version 4.8.0 20120725 (experimental) [trunk revision 189856] (GCC

[Bug fortran/54096] Type bound procedures

2012-07-25 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/54093] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2129

2012-07-25 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-07-25 19:27:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27873 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27873 2nd preprocessed src example Happens at -O2

[Bug target/54093] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2129

2012-07-25 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2012-07-25 19:28:40 UTC --- Created attachment 27874 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27874 3rd preprocessed src example Happens at -O1

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map 3x slower than 4.6.2

2012-07-25 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #11 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 19:32:53 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Jul 25 19:32:48 2012 New Revision: 189863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189863 Log: 2012-07-25 François

[Bug bootstrap/50461] mpfr.h found in mpfr-3.1.0/src instead of mpfr-3.0.1/. as previously

2012-07-25 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461 nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at

[Bug target/53110] GCC-4.7 generates stupid x86_64 asm

2012-07-25 Thread tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53110 --- Comment #13 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 20:11:23 UTC --- Author: tejohnson Date: Wed Jul 25 20:11:13 2012 New Revision: 189866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189866 Log: Backport the following patches

[Bug fortran/54096] Type bound procedures

2012-07-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug libfortran/54097] New: configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working (CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)

2012-07-25 Thread pentium4borg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54097 Bug #: 54097 Summary: configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working (CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libfortran/54097] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working (CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)

2012-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54097 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/54097] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working (CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)

2012-07-25 Thread pentium4borg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54097 pentium4borg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pentium4borg at gmail dot

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

2012-07-25 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 23:03:12 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Wed Jul 25 23:03:06 2012 New Revision: 189872 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189872 Log: PR target/54089 *

[Bug libfortran/54097] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working (CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)

2012-07-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54097 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 23:11:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Simple answer don't use -march=i686 in any of the *C*FLAGS env variables. Why is that? I thought

[Bug fortran/54096] Type bound procedures

2012-07-25 Thread badass at vt dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096 --- Comment #3 from badass at vt dot edu 2012-07-25 23:42:16 UTC --- Sorry about that, I though i had included the source code. I'm working on getting an updated compiler, but IT here is being difficult and I could take a day. Thanks for the help,

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

2012-07-25 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #44 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-26 00:20:05 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Jul 26 00:19:58 2012 New Revision: 189877 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189877 Log: PR target/51244 *

[Bug target/54093] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2129

2012-07-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last