http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #31 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
06:28:16 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed Aug 8 06:28:10 2012
New Revision: 190222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190222
Log:
PR middle-end/54146
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #31 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
06:28:16 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed Aug 8 06:28:10 2012
New Revision: 190222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190222
Log:
PR middle-end/54146
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54197
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #33 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
08:09:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Created attachment 27957 [details]
Do not traverse sibling loops
The idea here is to note that for a nested loop we know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Roman roman at qubyx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roman at qubyx dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Comment #2 from TbR slipstreamdrive at hotmail dot com 2012-08-08
08:57:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27958
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27958
Code example to trigger the supposed bug.
only the bug function triggers the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
TbR slipstreamdrive at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slipstreamdrive
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #34 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
10:10:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
I think you should simply move compute_global_livein to its single use
and make it static.
Yes, and I need to add the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
Bug #: 54198
Summary: [4.8 Regression] error: invalid use of incomplete
type when building Chromium
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199
Bug #: 54199
Summary: Superfluous diagnostic is also the name of an
intrinsic for internal procedures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
Bug #: 54200
Summary: copyrename generates wrong debuginfo
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792
Giulio Eulisse giulio.eulisse at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
11:26:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27959
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27959
proposed patch
The problem is that when checking expressions that are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
Bug #: 54201
Summary: XMM constant duplicated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
--- Comment #1 from Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb at cesarb dot net 2012-08-08
11:32:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 27961
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27961
Assembly output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #35 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
11:49:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
(In reply to comment #33)
I think you should simply move compute_global_livein to its single use
and make it static.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
Bug #: 54202
Summary: Overeager warning about freeing non-heap objects
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54157
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
13:39:41 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Aug 8 13:39:33 2012
New Revision: 190228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190228
Log:
Don't return identity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54157
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2012-08-08 14:21:59
UTC ---
To be honest, I don't want false-positive warnings. The code and data are
constructed so that it never frees the non-heap object (it has a reference
count of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
14:36:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
To be honest, I don't want false-positive warnings. The code and data are
constructed so that it never frees the non-heap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2012-08-08 14:53:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Note that even for the uninitialized use case we warn for functions
that may be never executed at runtime. So - are you happy with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-08-08
15:04:21 UTC ---
I don't think that is right.
A type may not be always lock free from the compiler's perspective, so
__atomic_always_lock_free() will return false.
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
15:26:43 UTC ---
I actually think GCC is correct, A B causes all member functions to be
instantiated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
15:31:09 UTC ---
The other thing which copyrename helps is register allocation as it allows out
of ssa to coalesce some ssa names which could not do before.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54203
Bug #: 54203
Summary: ctime on INT_MAX returns wrong date
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #36 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
17:39:49 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed Aug 8 17:39:46 2012
New Revision: 190235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190235
Log:
PR middle-end/54146
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54155
--- Comment #7 from damz dshanke at gmail dot com 2012-08-08 17:40:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-02
15:17:25 UTC ---
If I replace only the ld from GNU Binutils
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54203
Amin aminalipour at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-08
18:18:51 UTC ---
Thanks Giulio!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54204
Bug #: 54204
Summary: Wrong baseline_symbols.txt picked for x32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54204
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52449
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52449
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-*-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-08
19:00:58 UTC ---
Even the printf format warnings are this way too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54205
Bug #: 54205
Summary: recursive .debug_macro inclusions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
tim.vanholder at anubex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.vanholder at anubex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54188
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54188
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2012-08-08 21:43:18 UTC ---
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, rth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
N1370 (C11 draft) 6.5.3.4 paragraph 3 says:
The _Alignof operator yields
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
--- Comment #3 from Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb at cesarb dot net 2012-08-08
23:28:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27964
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27964
Another testcase
Another testcase. This one also shows it using two
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #9 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-08-09 02:06:27 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Fixed in 4.8.
Andreas,
My application uses a 4.6.1+ compiler from Code Sourcery for ColdFire uClinux
(no longer being sponsored by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #10 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-08-09 02:16:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I traced the second ICE to the -fPIC flag, ...
should be
I traced the first ICE to the -fPIC flag, ...
Larry Baker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Bug #: 54206
Summary: build in source dir breaks lto plugin detection
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
53 matches
Mail list logo