[Bug fortran/54199] Superfluous diagnostic is also the name of an intrinsic for internal procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/54200] copyrename generates wrong debuginfo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-09 08:05:51 UTC --- On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #1 from Johan Lundberg lundberj at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 08:08:46 UTC --- confirmed... I agree with this. Among other things it's important for boost/C++11 interop.

[Bug lto/54206] build in source dir breaks lto plugin detection

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/54201] XMM constant duplicated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/53902] make install fails on SunOS 5.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902 T.J. Yang tjyang2001 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tjyang2001 at

[Bug middle-end/54201] XMM constant duplicated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 10:21:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27965 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27965 idea Uh, the constant pool is filled via force_const_mem and I thought

[Bug c++/54155] Newly compiled GCC 4.4.4 on Solaris sparc gives problem with -m32/-m64 flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-08-09 10:45:20 UTC --- --- Comment #7 from damz dshanke at gmail dot com 2012-08-08 17:40:37 UTC --- How I wish that the supportability matrix was

[Bug bootstrap/53902] make install fails on SunOS 5.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902 --- Comment #2 from T.J. Yang tjyang2001 at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 10:58:54 UTC --- Found following URLs could be helpful to resolve the issue. http://echelog.com/logs/browse/oi-dev/1315000800.

[Bug c++/54207] New: ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Bug #: 54207 Summary: ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/53902] make install fails on SunOS 5.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902 --- Comment #3 from T.J. Yang tjyang2001 at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 11:05:55 UTC --- Also at http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/configure.ac?revision=189803view=markup, around line 2461. the previous fix is included in gcc trunk.

[Bug bootstrap/53902] make install fails on SunOS 5.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902 --- Comment #4 from T.J. Yang tjyang2001 at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 11:11:22 UTC --- I tried the gcc trunk src and named it as 4.7.2. but I am getting same error message.

[Bug c++/54207] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 11:39:10 UTC --- 4.7.1 gets an ICE too, but it works on trunk. As it's undefined behaviour (bool is a keyword) and it already works on trunk it might not be worth changing

[Bug c++/54155] Newly compiled GCC 4.4.4 on Solaris sparc gives problem with -m32/-m64 flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54155 --- Comment #9 from damz dshanke at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 12:02:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) --- Comment #7 from damz dshanke at gmail dot com 2012-08-08 17:40:37 UTC --- How I wish that the supportability matrix was published.

[Bug fortran/54199] Superfluous diagnostic is also the name of an intrinsic for internal procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 12:06:36 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Aug 9 12:06:31 2012 New Revision: 190251 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190251 Log: 2012-08-09 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54199] Superfluous diagnostic is also the name of an intrinsic for internal procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54199] Superfluous diagnostic is also the name of an intrinsic for internal procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54199 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/54206] build in source dir breaks lto plugin detection

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206 --- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-08-09 12:39:14 UTC --- I didn't do it, but I had to debug a user's gcc config who did it. WONTFIX would be wrong, if you really don't support it error out in configure please

[Bug tree-optimization/54027] [4.8 Regression] possible mis-optimization of signed left shift in c89 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54027 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug rtl-optimization/53701] ICE on ia64 (when building Allegro 4.4) in sel-sched

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701 --- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 14:08:38 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Thu Aug 9 14:08:31 2012 New Revision: 190253 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190253 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/54157] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54157 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 15:33:36 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Aug 9 15:33:28 2012 New Revision: 190256 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190256 Log: Don't return identity

[Bug fortran/54208] New: compilation error for ubound construct in PARAMETER statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208 Bug #: 54208 Summary: compilation error for ubound construct in PARAMETER statements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 --- Comment #30 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 15:51:25 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 9 15:51:20 2012 New Revision: 190257 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190257 Log: PR target/50751 *

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #46 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 15:55:23 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 9 15:55:18 2012 New Revision: 190258 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190258 Log: PR target/51244 *

[Bug bootstrap/54209] New: [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 Bug #: 54209 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 15:58:08 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 9 15:58:04 2012 New Revision: 190259 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190259 Log: PR target/39423 *

[Bug fortran/54208] compilation error for ubound construct in PARAMETER statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot

[Bug driver/54210] New: gcc unable to detect -mprfchw flag in bulldozer machines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 Bug #: 54210 Summary: gcc unable to detect -mprfchw flag in bulldozer machines Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/54211] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 Bug #: 54211 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 --- Comment #2 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 17:23:40 UTC --- MIPS provides a version of link.h in Android NDK as follows: Ex: From android-ndk-r8b/platforms/android-9/arch-mips/usr/include# cat

[Bug middle-end/54211] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug driver/54210] gcc unable to detect -mprfchw flag in bulldozer machines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 --- Comment #1 from GGanesh Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com 2012-08-09 18:04:39 UTC --- Calling the cpuid function 0x8001 does it for bulldozer architecture. Is it OK for upstream? Index: gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.c

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavel.v.chupin at

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 --- Comment #4 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 18:45:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) MIPS provides a version of link.h in Android NDK as follows: Ex: From

[Bug bootstrap/54209] [4.8 Regression] Failed to build gcc for Android/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 19:08:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Why isn't link.h in AOSP Bionic C library? ARM doesn't use eh_frame, so there is no need to create link.h at the beginning for

[Bug fortran/54208] compilation error for ubound construct in PARAMETER statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/54212] New: ARM: invalid instruction (vdupeq.32) generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212 Bug #: 54212 Summary: ARM: invalid instruction (vdupeq.32) generated Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/54213] New: please help to determine wether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 Bug #: 54213 Summary: please help to determine wether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 --- Comment #1 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 19:56:25 UTC --- Created attachment 27969 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27969 additional files to source asked

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 --- Comment #2 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 19:57:37 UTC --- Created attachment 27970 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27970 object file

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 --- Comment #3 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 19:58:55 UTC --- Created attachment 27971 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27971 assembler source file

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54214] New: (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Bug #: 54214 Summary: (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #1 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:15:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27973 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27973 additional files to source asked

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #2 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:18:08 UTC --- Created attachment 27974 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27974 object file

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #3 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:19:29 UTC --- Created attachment 27975 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27975 assembler source file

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #4 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:22:40 UTC --- operation system is Windows XP Home Edition(I guessit is an OEM version) with Service Pack 3 installed.

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #5 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:24:54 UTC --- my operation system is Windows XP Home Edition(I guess it is an OEM version) with Service Pack 3 installed.

[Bug middle-end/54211] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug driver/54210] gcc unable to detect -mprfchw flag in bulldozer machines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 20:36:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Is it OK for upstream? Please post the patch to gcc-patches@ mailing list, with correct ChangeLog and testing information.

[Bug middle-end/54211] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 21:06:22 UTC --- Ah, actually we're generating a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR when a PLUS_EXPR is called for. I see what's going on, shouldn't be hard to fix.

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 21:50:59 UTC --- Why is this marked enhancement ? Is this the same issue as PR 54213 ? If so please close that one. What exactly is your question and why do you think it's

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/54215] New: [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54215 Bug #: 54215 Summary: [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/54215] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54215 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||54211 ---

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #25 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 22:44:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) I'm not sure whether this should be back ported to 4.6.x or 4.7.x or not. Kaz, what do you think? Looks a bit intrusive

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:17:54 UTC --- OK, I checking out the preprocessed file reveals the following relevant pieces: typedef struct page { struct list_head list; struct address_space *mapping;

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:27:55 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 9 23:27:51 2012 New Revision: 190273 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190273 Log: PR target/54089 *

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:36:10 UTC --- Kaz, another thing I'm a bit unsure about ... #define SH_DYNAMIC_SHIFT_COST \ (TARGET_HARD_SH4 ? 1 : TARGET_DYNSHIFT ? (optimize_size ? 1 : 2) : 20) Do you

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 --- Comment #5 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-09 23:37:18 UTC --- please see comments for the bug 54214, because it is the same, but with corrected copyright notes.

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:42:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Kaz, another thing I'm a bit unsure about ... #define SH_DYNAMIC_SHIFT_COST \ (TARGET_HARD_SH4 ? 1 : TARGET_DYNSHIFT ?

[Bug bootstrap/54128] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 --- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-09 23:46:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27976 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27976 Cutdown test case I have attached a new test case, cut down from the original.

[Bug c++/54216] New: Missing diagnostic for ill-formed anonymous enum declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54216 Bug #: 54216 Summary: Missing diagnostic for ill-formed anonymous enum declarations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54216] Missing diagnostic for ill-formed anonymous enum declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54216 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug middle-end/54217] New: setup_save_areas() duplicates hard reg uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54217 Bug #: 54217 Summary: setup_save_areas() duplicates hard reg uses Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/54217] setup_save_areas() duplicates hard reg uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54217 --- Comment #1 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2012-08-10 00:22:22 UTC --- Created attachment 27978 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27978 test case for rl78-elf, from newlib

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 00:39:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) #define SH_DYNAMIC_SHIFT_COST (TARGET_DYNSHIFT ? 1 : 20) Sounds reasonable. Perhaps some historical reason for the original

[Bug middle-end/54211] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 01:14:41 UTC --- The following patch is tested and awaiting approval: Index: gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

[Bug middle-end/54215] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54215 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54211] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed building freetype with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-08-10 03:45:31 UTC --- I suppose it's the old issue that we update fibheap keys along each inlining decision - and with flatten there are just very many ... Honza? Well, I killed

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #38 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-08-10 03:50:26 UTC --- I don't understand how inline_merge_summary is supposed to work, so I'm going to leave that one for Richi and Honza. Well, it produces inline summary for

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #39 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-08-10 03:53:46 UTC --- Martin, can you look at comment #14 and the patch? I think what we want to do in flatten_function is before inline_call (e, true, NULL, NULL); reset

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #40 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 04:34:54 UTC --- OK, my simple ^C profiling shows: #14 0x0091f17f in estimate_edge_size_and_time (e=0x7fffb7192d68, size=optimized out, time=0x7fffc04110b0,

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #41 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 05:18:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27979 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27979 Path for inliner slowness Hi, this is patch I am testing. After some

[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at