http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
Bug #: 54476
Summary: Passing -1 to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles causes cc1
memory usage to explode on x86_64 host
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #52 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
08:03:08 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:01 2012
New Revision: 190909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190909
Log:
PR target/51244
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54443
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 08:03:16 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:09 2012
New Revision: 190910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190910
Log:
2012-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54244
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 08:03:18 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:09 2012
New Revision: 190910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190910
Log:
2012-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:08:54 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:08:50 2012
New Revision: 190914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190914
Log:
PR target/54220
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:14:40 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:14:36 2012
New Revision: 190916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190916
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:21:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:21:20 2012
New Revision: 190917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190917
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:29:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:28:58 2012
New Revision: 190918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190918
Log:
2012-09-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:37:11 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:37:08 2012
New Revision: 190920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190920
Log:
PR target/54476
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:36:48 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:36:44 2012
New Revision: 190919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190919
Log:
PR target/45070
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:38:48 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:38:42 2012
New Revision: 190921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190921
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 10:27:58 UTC ---
How about this patch? Not sure whether this handles cross-compiling. It
seems
to work for me.
Before I test the patch, I am surprised to see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-04
10:44:28 UTC ---
Apparently Tobias is not around today. I have posted a potential fix at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg8.html
tested on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #60 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
10:50:47 UTC ---
Another improvement that can be done for the test case, is to assign
pseudo-register numbers such that the density of the DF_LR and DF_LIVE bitmaps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54477
Bug #: 54477
Summary: Inlining summary generation should not change the
current function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #35 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
13:17:53 UTC ---
With -O1 FRE uses loads of memory and compile-time. Not the value-numbering
itself but compute_avail ()! Bah. Of course AVAIL sets get bigger and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Bug #: 54478
Summary: Fails to bootstrap with GCC 4.3.6
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
13:57:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28129
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28129
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54470
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Bug #: 54479
Summary: Bootstrap with release-checking broken
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
14:17:52 UTC ---
It seems that when clang is used as the system compiler we will have to use a
run-time test as well to determine drand support. On a 2009 Mac Pro,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-04 14:48:02
UTC ---
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil))
around. This insn marks function return,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Comment #2 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:17:00 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 15:16:51 2012
New Revision: 190937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190937
Log:
PR bootstrap/54479
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:28:46 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Sep 4 15:28:39 2012
New Revision: 190939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190939
Log:
PR bootstrap/54453
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54468
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54480
Bug #: 54480
Summary: Error: bad immediate value for offset
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:53:20 UTC ---
Why do you talk about clang? This has nothing to do with it. And, there is
already runtime check for whether RDRAND can be used in random.cc (though,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 15:56:17 UTC ---
As such, the patch in commen #20 does not work:
(1) on x86_64-apple-darwin10 it gives
[macbook] gcc/p_build% grep -r rdr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
--- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-09-04
16:09:23 UTC ---
Still the same with gcc-4.6-20120831:
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/libcpp'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 16:14:01 UTC ---
I am now at stage 2 with
--- ../_clean/libstdc++-v3/configure2012-08-29 10:19:44.0 +0200
+++ ../p_work/libstdc++-v3/configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54481
Bug #: 54481
Summary: missed optimization: unnecessary indirect call
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #26 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
16:37:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Why do you talk about clang? This has nothing to do with it. And, there is
already runtime check for whether RDRAND can be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #27 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
16:47:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Your proposed patch from comment 25 appears to be working under clang 4.0 of
Xcode 4.4. The configure test is properly run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54482
Bug #: 54482
Summary: catch-22 in static linking with libstdc++ fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
16:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Apparently Tobias is not around today. I have posted a potential fix at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg8.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
...
../gcc-4.8-20120904/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-isl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw
--with-system-zlib --enable-checking=yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
17:47:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #9 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2012-09-04 17:47:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
I posted the patches on Thursday, three patches because I found one more
issue,
to both lists.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #29 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:24:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
The Apple clang 4.0 compiler defaults to its integrated
assembler
such that the simple test case...
int
main ()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483
Bug #: 54483
Summary: undefined reference to static constexpr in .so
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
--- Comment #4 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:33:34 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:33:29 2012
New Revision: 190943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190943
Log:
This patch works
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:50:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:49:51 2012
New Revision: 190946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190946
Log:
PR c++/54437
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:50:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:49:51 2012
New Revision: 190946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190946
Log:
PR c++/54437
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54468
Michael H. Cox mhcox at bluezoosoftware dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
19:05:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Sep 4 19:05:38 2012
New Revision: 190947
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190947
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
19:35:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 19:35:02 2012
New Revision: 190949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190949
Log:
PR c++/54198
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54480
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54414
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54295
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ARM |arm*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
-DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/build -I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
20:21:23 UTC ---
Bootstrap failure remains at r190949.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Tom Rini tom.rini at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm*, x86_64-linux-gnu |arm*-linux-gnu
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Tom Rini tom.rini at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
--- Comment #2 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
21:07:56 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 21:07:48 2012
New Revision: 190951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190951
Log:
Fix bootstrap failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485
Bug #: 54485
Summary: g++ should diagnose default arguments in out-of-line
definitions for template class member functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374
--- Comment #3 from Glenn Burkhardt gbburkhardt at gmail dot com 2012-09-04
21:40:55 UTC ---
I'd be more convinced about 'works for me' if I could see the full version
number of the compiler. I've just double checked that the files I uploaded
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 21:46:55
UTC ---
Proposed patch has been posted to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02089.html
Use NONDEBUG_INSN_P instead of INSN_P in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-04
21:54:56 UTC ---
For the record, this was started with the patch submitted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01456.html. From the Ada failures
reported at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
asharif at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28096|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
--- Comment #3 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 22:48:51 UTC ---
Sorry about that.
Attached is a preprocessed file that reproduces the bug.
gcc version: gcc-4.6.4 at 19788:190734 (as reported by svnversion -c)
system type: arm linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
23:06:29 UTC ---
Oh I see, my bad to have missed your command line. Sorry.
I see what's going on here. It's just luck that this works on x86_64 with your
invocation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486
Bug #: 54486
Summary: Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent
type 'sizetype'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05
04:17:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 5 04:16:58 2012
New Revision: 190961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190961
Log:
PR c++/54420
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54441
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05
04:17:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 5 04:17:12 2012
New Revision: 190962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190962
Log:
PR c++/54441
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54441
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
95 matches
Mail list logo