http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51712
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Nieder jrnieder at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
07:55:56 UTC ---
Hi Kyrill,
(In reply to comment #11)
Adding the -fno-short-enums fixes the
extra warning generated by the arg = 0 comparison in pr51712.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51712
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
08:43:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
If the -fno-short-enums option is needed here, isn't that a bug?
Agreed. This is just hiding the bug for the testsuite but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-16
09:51:21 UTC ---
Dominique, could you attach the tests.
http://www.polyhedron.com/polyhedron_benchmark_suite0html
Probably a dup of the discussion going on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
10:07:31 UTC ---
Agreed, please just disable the test entirely on the targets where it fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-16
10:49:22 UTC ---
The problem is that by the time at the end of cp_parser_simple_declaration we
call check_tag_decl (via shadow_tag), which is supposed to check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
Bug #: 54938
Summary: sh libgcc_unpack_df.o fails to build:
../../../srcw/libgcc/fp-bit.h:221:19: internal
compiler error: in emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1, at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54889
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
11:12:47 UTC ---
Jakub, are you going to commit the fix or there are some issues with it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54936
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54889
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
11:19:42 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 16 11:19:37 2012
New Revision: 192493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192493
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54796
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
11:21:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 16 11:21:20 2012
New Revision: 192494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192494
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
11:49:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #0)
The code related to shift patterns in sh.c / sh.md maybe could use some
improvements here and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-16 12:35:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 28454
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28454
preprocessed source
cc1 invocation from using -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:02:09 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:02:02 2012
New Revision: 192495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192495
Log:
2012-10-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #44 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:02:09 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:02:02 2012
New Revision: 192495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192495
Log:
2012-10-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:13:41 UTC ---
Now fixed: Several issues with OPTIONAL.
TODO:
- Issues with OPTIONAL and ELEMENTAL,
cf. commented FIXME lines in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:20:37 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:20:30 2012
New Revision: 192497
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192497
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #9 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
13:22:26 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:22:22 2012
New Revision: 192498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192498
Log:
2012-10-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-16 14:21:29 UTC
---
I'll try to plug the hole somewhere. Honza, any good idea?
Hmm, adding __bulitin_noreturn call when this happens?
Sounds sloppy, too. We should ask user
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54939
Bug #: 54939
Summary: Very poor vectorization of loops with complex
arithmetic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54939
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-16 14:42:32 UTC ---
Another example is math/test-tgmath2.c from glibc.
(after compiling for 1:40 minutes):
test-tgmath2.c: In function ‘test’:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54939
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
14:54:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 28455
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28455
test reproducer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54939
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
15:06:19 UTC ---
I looked through the list of all issues related to vectorization but could not
find duplicate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
15:31:55 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Oct 16 15:31:46 2012
New Revision: 192502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192502
Log:
2012-10-16 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
15:31:53 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Oct 16 15:31:46 2012
New Revision: 192502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192502
Log:
2012-10-16 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54939
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
15:31:52 UTC ---
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
15:39:08 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Oct 16 15:38:58 2012
New Revision: 192503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192503
Log:
2012-10-16 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
15:39:09 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Oct 16 15:38:58 2012
New Revision: 192503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192503
Log:
2012-10-16 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #1 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com 2012-10-16
15:46:31 UTC ---
This is still an error on 4.7.2.
It is the const before the std::shared_ptrconst T that is the problem:
templatetypename T
#if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-16
15:50:45 UTC ---
Note that the fix in comment 9 for libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/pr24455.C
works for Xcode 3.2.6 and earlier on darwin10 but not Xcode 4.2. This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
16:38:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 28456
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28456
Path I am considering
Hi,
I am considering to enable inlining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
--- Comment #4 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com 2012-10-16
17:04:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks Jörn.
The problem is not related to my changes in PR 51244. It is caused by the
latest change to optabs.c:
2012-10-15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911
--- Comment #6 from j-frankish at slb dot com 2012-10-16 17:11:38 UTC ---
This works - thanks
CFLAGS=-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe CXXFLAGS=-march=i486 -mtune=i686
-Os -pipe CC=gcc -msse2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin CXX=g++ -msse2 -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54423
--- Comment #2 from Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com 2012-10-16
17:38:37 UTC ---
I verified that I have the latest Xcode (4.5). I verified that I installed the
latest development CLI tools (via Xcode and manual download).
* I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-16 17:57:52 UTC ---
Before the patch in comment #20, I get
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dominiq staff 73336 Oct 16 19:19 a.out*
[macbook] lin/test% time gfc -fprotect-parens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
17:59:57 UTC ---
This is the problem:
Index: tree-diagnostic.c
===
--- tree-diagnostic.c (revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
18:05:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28457
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28457
better fix
The code is re-using the diagnostic passed as an argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-16 18:38:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 28458
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28458
glibc math testcase
Please note that gcc-4.6 and 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54423
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-16 20:58:58 UTC ---
With the patch I see a ~10% slowdown in the Test4 - Lapack 2 (1001x1001) of
test_fpu.f90 compared to revision 192449
[macbook] lin/test% time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54938
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16 21:22:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
In emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1, the line
gcc_assert (!find_reg_note (insn, REG_BR_PROB, 0));
blows up,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
Bug #: 54940
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at
fortran/expr.c:4609
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-16
22:26:40 UTC ---
Well, you know that already, but I have to remind you that this is not the best
place to send patches. When you consider your fix mature enough
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-16
22:32:02 UTC ---
A shorter self contained testcase, not involving the whole std::shared_ptr,
would certainly help. Dodji, are there any chances you can look into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52995
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
22:49:13 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Oct 16 22:49:07 2012
New Revision: 192517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192517
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-16
23:06:16 UTC ---
In terms of workarounds, what about using -std=c++11?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
23:09:30 UTC ---
templatetypename T
struct X { };
templatetypename T
using Y = const XT;
templatetypename T
using Z = YT;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-16
23:13:18 UTC ---
Excellent.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
23:16:48 UTC ---
The second alias doesn't even have to be a template to show the problem:
templatetypename T
struct X { };
templatetypename T
using Y = const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-16
23:18:11 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Oct 16 23:18:08 2012
New Revision: 192518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192518
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54423
--- Comment #4 from Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com 2012-10-16
23:20:41 UTC ---
I removed /Development and /Application/Xcode.app then installed it again. Now
I am able to build gcc again. Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54423
Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37457
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54941
Bug #: 54941
Summary: do not print line/column numbers for built-in:0:0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54942
Bug #: 54942
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: OOM with -O3
-fno-cse-follow-jumps -funroll-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54942
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2012-10-17 05:00:16
UTC ---
==21397== Invalid read of size 8
==21397==at 0x8C1D76: unroll_and_peel_loops(int) (sbitmap.h:141)
==21397==by 0x8B25E7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54942
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
71 matches
Mail list logo
