[Bug c++/55227] New: designated initializer for char array by string constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227 Bug #: 55227 Summary: designated initializer for char array by string constant Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 --- Comment #28 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 08:42:17 UTC --- Author: davem Date: Wed Nov 7 08:42:09 2012 New Revision: 193283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193283 Log: Revert sparc U constraint

[Bug bootstrap/55211] [4.8 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with SIGILL while compiling __mulvti3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55211 davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug go/55228] New: index.go should check size of int instead of GOARCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 Bug #: 55228 Summary: index.go should check size of int instead of GOARCH Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/55224] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/tailcall-1.c scan-assembler jmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55224 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #33 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 09:34:25 UTC --- Created attachment 28628 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28628 Final patch (I hope) This is version of path I will commit today

[Bug rtl-optimization/55158] ICE: [4.8 Regression] [IA64] segv in schedule_region

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug rtl-optimization/55151] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1217 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/55149] [4.8 Regression] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/54992] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Wrong offset in the array offset calculation when using nonclass%class(index)%nonclass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/55147] [4.8 Regression] x86: wrong code for 64-bit load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55147 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/49220] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:401

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49220 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 10:48:22 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Wed Nov 7 10:48:12 2012 New Revision: 193289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193289 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/55141] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -fno-split-wide-types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/55226] [4.8 Regression] ICE regression in regard to anonymous unions and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55226 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52008] [Core/1495] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/55226] [4.8 Regression] ICE regression in regard to anonymous unions and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55226 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 11:15:48 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 7 11:15:40 2012 New Revision: 193292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193292 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 11:15:50 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 7 11:15:40 2012 New Revision: 193292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193292 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/55226] [4.8 Regression] ICE regression in regard to anonymous unions and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55226 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Bug 54922 depends on bug 55226, which changed state. Bug 55226 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE regression in regard to anonymous unions and constexpr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55226 What|Old Value

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #34 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 11:17:28 UTC --- Created attachment 28629 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28629 Array index hint This patch should help to inline when array

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/54997] [4.8 Regression] -Wunused-function gives false warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/55018] [4.6/4.7 Regression] CDDCE pass is too aggressive sometimes with infinite loops and with some functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55018 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7

[Bug debug/54953] [4.8 Regression] New sra-1.c FAILs on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/55231] New: ICE in output_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:21782 with -gsplit-dwarf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55231 Bug #: 55231 Summary: ICE in output_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:21782 with -gsplit-dwarf Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 12:15:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Guess perhaps the designated array initializers need to be parsed tentatively for C++11, and if they aren't valid, we'd

[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 12:24:46 UTC --- I think it is unambiguous, as for designated initializer there needs to be = after ], while for lambda {, right? The thing with tentative parsing is

[Bug c++/54947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 12:29:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I think it is unambiguous, as for designated initializer there needs to be = after ], Ah yes, that's true. while for

[Bug debug/55231] ICE in output_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:21782 with -gsplit-dwarf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55231 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-11-07 12:31:32 UTC --- Another issue: markus@x4 ~ % c++ -c -O0 -gsplit-dwarf test.ii -o /dev/null

[Bug middle-end/54921] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/54990] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in tree_operand_check on SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54990 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/54546] SH: Enable -fshrink-wrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54546 --- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 13:23:53 UTC --- There is still the reorder-branch-and-partition issue pending... (In reply to comment #3) Even though simple_return is not supported on SHmedia, is it OK to close

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with -O2 -fcheck=bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/55232] New: [C++0x] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Bug #: 55232 Summary: [C++0x] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/55232] [C++0x] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-07 13:46:39 UTC --- --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 13:31:26 UTC --- So, is this now fixed? If

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-07 14:00:12 UTC --- Actually is the -Wunused alone which makes the difference, not the --enable-checking. Weird, must be due to diagnostics reentered. Weird.

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] Compilation fails if expanding function param pack in initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 14:03:40 UTC --- Specifically, -Wunused-parameter struct vector { typedef int value_type; }; template class... T struct X { void push_back( typename

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 14:05:15 UTC --- Did you mean some other PR?

[Bug debug/54828] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in based_loc_descr at dwarf2out.c:10560 with -g -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828 --- Comment #7 from John Baldwin jhb at FreeBSD dot org 2012-11-07 14:06:22 UTC --- I tested the backport to 4.7 on my original production case and it compiles fine now, thanks!

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] ICE with -Wunused-parameter for unused parameter pack using qualified dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-checking|

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] ICE with -Wunused-parameter for unused parameter pack using qualified dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 14:08:42 UTC --- 4.7.3 gives: t.cc: In instantiation of 'void XT::push_back(typename T::value_type ...) [with T = {vector}; typename T::value_type = type error]':

[Bug libstdc++/55233] New: libstdc++ atomic does not support hle_acquire/release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55233 Bug #: 55233 Summary: libstdc++ atomic does not support hle_acquire/release Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/55219] [4.7/4.8 regression] attempting to compile a pre-processed unit eats up memory until OOM kills the cc1 process

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou

[Bug middle-end/55219] [4.7/4.8 regression] attempting to compile a pre-processed unit eats up memory until OOM kills the cc1 process

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 14:18:36 UTC --- Slightly deobfuscated testcase: int x, c, d, e, f, g, h, i; double j; const int k; const enum { B } a; void fn1 (void) { h = (g ? c : g ? f : g

[Bug c++/55232] [C++11] ICE with -Wunused-parameter for unused parameter pack using qualified dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.7.3 |

[Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 --- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-11-07 14:45:17 UTC --- I saw the problem both with bootstrapped and non bootstrapped (4.6 base) compilers I haven't checked if it's always the missing and, but it's likely

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #17 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-07 14:45:59 UTC --- Finally I got it working. You are right, there are _GLOBAL* symbols generated for each constructor, but only when you specify the init_priority attr for

[Bug c++/55203] No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-07 14:54:59 UTC --- Patches should go to gcc-patches. But I'm afraid it's too late for something like this to make 4.8.0.

[Bug c++/55149] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression] capturing

[Bug middle-end/55219] [4.7/4.8 regression] attempting to compile a pre-processed unit eats up memory until OOM kills the cc1 process

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major

[Bug c++/55097] [4.7/4.8 Regression] typedef not recognized in templated class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55097 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/55058] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type conversion error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55141] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -fno-split-wide-types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/55224] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/tailcall-1.c scan-assembler jmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55224 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #18 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-07 15:25:27 UTC --- Follow up on comment 17: 1) I did try to set the priority on the shared lib (via -binitfini) and it does not work. I mean the priority is set but the

[Bug fortran/55234] New: module procedure potential syntax error within interface block

, other compilers like xlf or pgf90 complain about it. gcc version 4.8.0 20121107 (experimental) (GCC) module mod interface foo module procedure :: foo1 end interface contains subroutine foo1 ( ) end subroutine foo1 end module mod Valery

[Bug c++/55159] pythy constexpr auto lambda pointer has no initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55159 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 15:56:00 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Nov 7 15:55:54 2012 New Revision: 193298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193298 Log: 2012-11-07

[Bug c++/55159] pythy constexpr auto lambda pointer has no initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55159 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/55003] [C++11] Member function pointer not working as constexpr initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/55234] module procedure potential syntax error within interface block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55234 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/51294] spurious warning from -Wconversion in C and C++ in conditional expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 16:58:13 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Wed Nov 7 16:58:03 2012 New Revision: 193301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193301 Log: 2012-11-07 Manuel

[Bug c/51294] spurious warning from -Wconversion in C and C++ in conditional expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-07 17:17:47 UTC --- On 11/7/2012 8:29 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Which test started failing? pr53410 was failing here

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55235] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 Bug #: 55235 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55235] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-07 17:39:52 UTC --- (gdb) p debug_rtx (x) (mem/j/c:BLK (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 54 virtual-stack-vars) (const_int -16 [0xfff0])) [0 a.V4SF+0 S16 A128]) $1 =

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 17:54:20 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Wed Nov 7 17:54:11 2012 New Revision: 193302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193302 Log: c-family/ 2012-11-07

[Bug fortran/54997] [4.8 Regression] -Wunused-function gives false warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug debug/53145] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/54671] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.2 -Wl,--no-ctors-in-init-array causes binutils test failure, works with 4.7.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54671 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 18:27:22 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Wed Nov 7 18:27:14 2012 New Revision: 193304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193304 Log: gcc/ 2012-11-07 Manuel

[Bug c++/50998] [C++0x] ICE partial specialization error at cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50998 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/52008] [Core/1495] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 18:35:13 UTC --- If you compile the testcase with the unmodified compiler but without -fPIC, you get in the assembly file: movl%edx,

[Bug c++/52965] c++11 - subclass is private, but g++ ignores access modifier when using auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/52965] c++11 - subclass is private, but g++ ignores access modifier when using auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 --- Comment #3 from James Caccese jwcacces at yahoo dot com 2012-11-07 18:40:44 UTC --- On 11/7/2012 1:39 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at

[Bug c++/52965] c++11 - subclass is private, but g++ ignores access modifier when using auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-11-07 18:45:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I agree with Jonathan and James this issue can be closed.

[Bug c++/52965] c++11 - subclass is private, but g++ ignores access modifier when using auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/55235] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/55235] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-07 19:05:33 UTC --- It looks to me that this is the problematic change: --- trunk/gcc/expr.c2012/10/20 20:16:27192640 +++ trunk/gcc/expr.c2012/10/20 21:00:23

[Bug c++/52816] [C++11] Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug target/55224] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/tailcall-1.c scan-assembler jmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55224 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 19:30:53 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 7 19:30:48 2012 New Revision: 193305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193305 Log: PR target/55224 *

[Bug target/55224] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/tailcall-1.c scan-assembler jmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55224 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/55224] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/tailcall-1.c scan-assembler jmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55224 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 19:35:29 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 7 19:35:25 2012 New Revision: 193306 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193306 Log: PR target/55224 *

[Bug target/48385] x86-64: Tail call recursion optimization with -mcmodel=large can generate invalid assembly (immediate operand illegal with absolute jump)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-07 19:47:58 UTC --- This was fixed for gcc-4.6.2 in r176841, the 4.6 fix for the essentially identical issue reported as PR49866. The generated assembly for the test case

[Bug c++/43313] ICE with non-POD and covariant return thunks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43313 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |

[Bug middle-end/55235] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-07 20:17:45 UTC --- Please note that before your patch, emit_block_move was never called. Following patch fixes testcase for me: --cut here-- Index: expr.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/55158] [4.8 Regression] [IA64] ICE: segv in schedule_region

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 20:57:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The last basic block is 23, and the array bb_state[] is initialized only for entries 0..22. Perhaps the number entries

  1   2   >