http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
16:00:35 UTC ---
I don't think this is a G++ bug, there are three problems with this code:
1) You need to #include new to use placement new
2) factory::apply is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-03 16:01:43 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 3 16:01:32 2012
New Revision: 194098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194098
Log:
/cp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-rtems4.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55046
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 16:06:22 UTC ---
I have a patch to ignore the comparison failure and a couple changes to
libbacktrace
for hpux. The btest program now runs successfully on hpux. However,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
16:11:33 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Dec 3 16:11:21 2012
New Revision: 194099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194099
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
16:48:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 28861
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28861
proposed patch 4.6 only
IMO there are multiple problems being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
16:53:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 3 16:53:25 2012
New Revision: 194101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194101
Log:
2012-12-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
17:20:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 3 17:19:47 2012
New Revision: 194102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194102
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55380
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
17:20:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 3 17:19:47 2012
New Revision: 194102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194102
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #12 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-12-03 17:24:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Thanks for the experiment. I think that you just need to always bootstrap the
compiler (i.e. don't pass --disable-bootstrap)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55046
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577
Bug #: 55577
Summary: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578
Bug #: 55578
Summary: Disabling warnings inside macro definition doesn't
work
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
18:43:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 28862
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28862
patch to revert the returns twice patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
18:43:58 UTC ---
Everybody has them, I've said in the mail containing the patch that there are a
few unanalyzed failures, and what the reasons for some of those failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
18:48:08 UTC ---
Everybody has them, I've said in the mail containing the patch that there are
a
few unanalyzed failures, and what the reasons for some of those
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
--- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
19:04:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 28863
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28863
proposed patch for 4.7
Same as 4.6 modulo fuzz + conflicts.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-03 19:15:09 UTC ---
adding it helps
t = build_constructor (TREE_TYPE (t), n);
+ if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (t)) == VECTOR_TYPE)
+t = fold (t);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
19:52:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 28864
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28864
minimal cumulative patch for comment #9
(In reply to comment #9)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55579
Bug #: 55579
Summary: SRA doesn't create debug stmts when they would be
useful
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55158
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
21:06:23 UTC ---
Someone needs to do something here because the C/C++/Fortran testsuite results
are abysmal at -O3.
And the tentative fix doesn't really help,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580
Bug #: 55580
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - with
variadic template parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
21:13:50 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 3 21:13:42 2012
New Revision: 194104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194104
Log:
2012-12-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-03 21:58:05 UTC ---
thanks Marc,
adding your proposed change above Jason's one make my full test works (but when
subscripting is involved..)
this is my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-03 22:05:29 UTC ---
about subscripting I get an ICE (set fault)
with
constexpr V4 v = {1,1,1,0};
constexpr V4 m[3] = { (V4){1,0,0,0}, (V4){0,1,0,0},
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55548
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 22:06:45 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 3 22:06:41 2012
New Revision: 194105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194105
Log:
2012-12-03 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55581
Bug #: 55581
Summary: Too-eager instantiation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #7 from Mihai Preda mpreda at gmail dot com 2012-12-03 22:13:03
UTC ---
Thanks, I didn't realize that (unsigned)-1.0 is undefined.
For the behavior I was expecting it's enough to use an intermediary cast
through int, e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55548
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03 22:19:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
However, the precision claimed by the COUNT_RATE argument should better match
the actual precision (also with default flags!).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-03
22:30:53 UTC ---
typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 4*sizeof(float) ) ) ) V4;
constexpr V4 v = {1,1,1,0};
constexpr V4 r = v[0]+v;
is enough to reproduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-03 22:33:39 UTC ---
On 12/3/2012 11:06 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
However, backtrace still doesn't work from within compiler.
Problem is with fileline_initialize. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580
--- Comment #1 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2012-12-03 22:42:06 UTC ---
I believe the following reduced snippet reproduces the original crash:
---
templateint struct V { };
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582
Bug #: 55582
Summary: [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal
without leading underscore.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580
--- Comment #2 from arturswiderski82 at gmail dot com arturswiderski82 at
gmail dot com 2012-12-03 23:10:49 UTC ---
Yes it solved my problem thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
--- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-12-03 23:17:22 UTC
---
I no longer have access to the source tree that exhibited this problem, but it
was likely the same as the qemu issue referenced earlier. Feel free to resolve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45700
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42628
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50398
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-12-03 23:20:57 UTC
---
loop flattening was removed as a feature, yes? If so, this bug can be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-12-03 23:24:13
UTC ---
Someone needs to do something here because the C/C++/Fortran testsuite
results
are abysmal at -O3.
And the tentative fix doesn't really help, it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55046
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
(x86_64-linux-gnu)
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.0 20121203 (experimental) [trunk revision 194106]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
All produce the same code modulo register size differences mentioned above. gcc
HEAD changes sal to leal (,%rcx,4),%eax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55583
--- Comment #1 from Mikko Markus Torni mtkilpailut at torni dot org
2012-12-04 00:08:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 28867
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28867
gcc-HEAD compiler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50468
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55583
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55401
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-04
00:35:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
* let the letter 's' go by as a user-defined literal (with appropriate
comment)
IMHO special cases to allow std-defined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55583
Mikko Markus Torni mikko.markus.torni at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28866|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55584
Bug #: 55584
Summary: __sync_fetch_and_* friends do not issue warnings when
CPU does not support them natively
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55571
--- Comment #8 from Joel Brobecker brobecker at gnat dot com 2012-12-04
04:51:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28869
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28869
Small reproducer with arm-eabi
In case it's useful to anyone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
Antony Polukhin antoshkka at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
101 - 169 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
