http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
20:08:34 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 4 20:08:29 2013
New Revision: 195735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195735
Log:
2013-02-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #52 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
21:07:42 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 4 21:07:35 2013
New Revision: 195737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195737
Log:
2013-02-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression] sizeof
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56200
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
21:36:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What happens if you also use -fno-ivopts ?
For me, -fno-ivopts gives a small improvement, but still slower than -O0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:33:19
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013
New Revision: 195741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195741
Log:
2013-02-04 Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:33:19
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013
New Revision: 195741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195741
Log:
2013-02-04 Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
22:41:47 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:41:44 2013
New Revision: 195742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195742
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55146
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:43:50
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:43:47 2013
New Revision: 195743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195743
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56209
Bug #: 56209
Summary: Function __attribute__((interrupt)),
__attribute__((naked)) is needed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56209
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25967
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akobets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05
00:09:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54685.c scan-assembler-not not
I'm curious why this fails. On my sh-elf / newlib config it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210
Bug #: 56210
Summary: invalid -Warray-bounds warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210
--- Comment #1 from jim at meyering dot net 2013-02-05 00:26:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 29352
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29352
preprocessed k.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56198
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05
01:11:05 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 5 01:11:01 2013
New Revision: 195747
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195747
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56198
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182
--- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2013-02-05
05:37:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
yes, the Gentoo build has to undo all the magic checks that gcc adds in a naïve
attempt to find the right multilib which makes it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-02-05 06:37:06 UTC ---
I think I found the problem, the root is actually not related to sfinae
(fortunately), but to the way how name-lookup in classes work in gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211
Bug #: 56211
Summary: gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05
07:08:44 UTC ---
Do you have a testcase?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joey.ye at arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
--- Comment #6 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2013-02-05 07:48:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This issue also impacts ldrexh/ldrexb as assembler doesn't accept ldrexh r1,
[r0, #0]. Better to backport to 4.7.
and 4.6
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo