[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-04 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 20:08:34 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Feb 4 20:08:29 2013 New Revision: 195735 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195735 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] sizeof sfinae fails to work

2013-02-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54195] [4.8 Regression][OOP] IMPORT fails with GENERIC TBP: is already present in the interface

2013-02-04 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-04 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 --- Comment #52 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 21:07:42 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Feb 4 21:07:35 2013 New Revision: 195737 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195737 Log: 2013-02-04

[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] Some classic sfinae cases fail to work

2013-02-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression] sizeof

[Bug sanitizer/55617] static constructors are not being instrumented correctly on darwin

2013-02-04 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56200] queens benchmark is faster with -O0 than with any other optimization level

2013-02-04 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56200 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 21:36:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) What happens if you also use -fno-ivopts ? For me, -fno-ivopts gives a small improvement, but still slower than -O0.

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

2013-02-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013 New Revision: 195741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195741 Log: 2013-02-04 Paul

[Bug fortran/47517] [F03] Reallocate on assignment: Segfault

2013-02-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013 New Revision: 195741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195741 Log: 2013-02-04 Paul

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

2013-02-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47517] [F03] Reallocate on assignment: Segfault

2013-02-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54386] [4.8 Regression] Unaligned mem load wrongly generated for inlined inline/static function

2013-02-04 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386 --- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:41:47 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Feb 4 22:41:44 2013 New Revision: 195742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195742 Log: PR

[Bug target/55146] jumptables with byte entries produce wrong code with -Os/-O2 for SH-1

2013-02-04 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55146 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04 22:43:50 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Feb 4 22:43:47 2013 New Revision: 195743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195743 Log: PR

[Bug target/56209] New: Function __attribute__((interrupt)), __attribute__((naked)) is needed

2013-02-04 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56209 Bug #: 56209 Summary: Function __attribute__((interrupt)), __attribute__((naked)) is needed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/54685] [SH] Improve unsigned int comparison with 0x7FFFFFFF

2013-02-04 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at

[Bug target/56209] Function __attribute__((interrupt)), __attribute__((naked)) is needed

2013-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56209 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/25967] Add attribute naked for x86

2013-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25967 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets

[Bug middle-end/54685] [SH] Improve unsigned int comparison with 0x7FFFFFFF

2013-02-04 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05 00:09:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54685.c scan-assembler-not not I'm curious why this fails. On my sh-elf / newlib config it

[Bug middle-end/56210] New: invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-04 Thread jim at meyering dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 Bug #: 56210 Summary: invalid -Warray-bounds warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-04 Thread jim at meyering dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 --- Comment #1 from jim at meyering dot net 2013-02-05 00:26:50 UTC --- Created attachment 29352 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29352 preprocessed k.c

[Bug bootstrap/56198] [4.8 Regression] Go profiledbootstrap error

2013-02-04 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56198 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05 01:11:05 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 5 01:11:01 2013 New Revision: 195747 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195747 Log: PR

[Bug bootstrap/56198] [4.8 Regression] Go profiledbootstrap error

2013-02-04 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56198 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/56182] [4.6 Regression] gcc/config/i386/t-linux64:29: recipe commences before first target

2013-02-04 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56182 --- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2013-02-05 05:37:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) yes, the Gentoo build has to undo all the magic checks that gcc adds in a naïve attempt to find the right multilib which makes it

[Bug c++/56208] [4.8 Regression] Some classic sfinae cases fail to work

2013-02-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-02-05 06:37:06 UTC --- I think I found the problem, the root is actually not related to sfinae (fortunately), but to the way how name-lookup in classes work in gcc.

[Bug tree-optimization/56211] New: gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64

2013-02-04 Thread allan at archlinux dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211 Bug #: 56211 Summary: gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/56211] gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64

2013-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05 07:08:44 UTC --- Do you have a testcase?

[Bug target/56211] gnulib yesno compiled incorrectly with -02 on x86_64

2013-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56211 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug target/54051] [4.7 Regression] Invalid alignment specifier generated for vld3_lane_* and vld3_dup_* intrinsics.

2013-02-04 Thread joey.ye at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051 Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joey.ye at arm

[Bug target/54051] [4.7 Regression] Invalid alignment specifier generated for vld3_lane_* and vld3_dup_* intrinsics.

2013-02-04 Thread joey.ye at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051 --- Comment #6 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2013-02-05 07:48:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) This issue also impacts ldrexh/ldrexb as assembler doesn't accept ldrexh r1, [r0, #0]. Better to backport to 4.7. and 4.6

<    1   2