[Bug rtl-optimization/48188] ICE: SIGSEGV in remove_unnecessary_regions (ira-build.c:1855) with --param ira-max-loops-num=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48188 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/56847] [4.8/4.9 Regression] '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug rtl-optimization/56847] [4.8/4.9 Regression] '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #70 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de 2013-04-05 07:15:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #69) (In reply to comment #68) Is this problem resolved? The status is still set to NEW but known to work

[Bug target/48308] [4.6 Regression] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48182] ICE: SIGSEGV in try_crossjump_to_edge (cfgcleanup.c:1703) with --param min-crossjump-insns=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48182 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/56845] [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 --- Comment #19 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2013-04-05 09:33:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Hi, I am seeing intermittent issues with CLASS,ALLOCATABLE,INTENT(OUT) variables that have a CLASS,ALLOCATABLE

[Bug middle-end/56848] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Bug #: 56848 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 09:51:33 UTC --- seen on x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug other/43620] [4.3 Release Blocker] Uploading to gnu.org will fail due to automake security issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43620 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 10:11:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 5 09:57:53 2013 New Revision: 197511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197511root=gccview=rev Log: PR

[Bug libstdc++/56841] [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol __atomic_exchange_8 in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a[eh_terminate.o]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug libstdc++/56841] [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol __atomic_exchange_8 in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a[eh_terminate.o]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 10:14:42 UTC --- Dave, does it work after rev 197512 ?

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-05 10:41:42 UTC --- With the new reduced testcase I'm now also able to reproduce the failure on an x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu x

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 10:47:05 UTC --- Reverting the backport for 56077 lets the file compile

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 --- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 11:35:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) I am seeing intermittent issues with CLASS,ALLOCATABLE,INTENT(OUT) variables that have a CLASS,ALLOCATABLE component;

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 --- Comment #21 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2013-04-05 12:29:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) (In reply to comment #18) I am seeing intermittent issues with CLASS,ALLOCATABLE,INTENT(OUT) variables that

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 12:30:38 UTC --- backporting r190733 fixes the issue too, testsuite still running

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-04-05 12:46:17 UTC --- doko at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #5 from Matthias

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-05 14:16:12 UTC --- I forgot to mention that for the build to succeed you also need r184239:

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 14:22:24 UTC --- the backport of r190733 doesn't show any regressions on x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug go/56827] Building Go support for gcc 4.8.0 fails on Linux: undefined type ‘SockFilter’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56827 --- Comment #2 from Markus mrcs.gcc at mailnull dot com 2013-04-05 14:37:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29809 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29809 crude workaround for a DIFFERENT PROBLEM: ustat missing while trying

[Bug c++/56838] GCC svn doesn't compile libreoffice 4.0.1.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 14:37:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) The candidate in /usr/include/boost/bind/bind.hpp:1478 a.cpp:92092 fails. SFINAE so this candidate is skipped. Actually,

[Bug target/56843] PowerPC Newton-Raphson reciprocal estimates can be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 15:03:26 UTC --- Looks like we can improve performance for three cases on P6 and later machines: - 32-bit reciprocal square root: remove two instructions - 32-bit

[Bug c++/51582] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using a class with a matrix of complex numbers in C++0x mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 15:18:10 UTC --- This was fixed on the trunk by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177073 I put a simpler variant on the 4.6 branch to fix 49924, but

[Bug c++/53786] [C++11] alias template - error on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51239] ICE with variadic template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51239 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/56849] New: Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Bug #: 56849 Summary: Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56843] PowerPC Newton-Raphson reciprocal estimates can be improved

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-04-05 20:02:31 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I get pr56849.f90:3: x(:,1:1) = reshape(y(::2), [1,2]) 1 Error: Different shape for array assignment at (1) on

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments with an ORDER= attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56850] New: Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 Bug #: 56850 Summary: Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/56850] Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56850] Diagnostic of REAL*8 is odd: Accepted with -std=f95, -pedantic prints warning only with -std=gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56850 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments with an ORDER= attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 20:38:05 UTC --- Seems as if someone missed the purpose of ORDER=, which doesn't affect the shape: print *, shape (reshape([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,3], order=[1,2])) print

[Bug c/56851] New: Segmentation Error using -O3 optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56851 Bug #: 56851 Summary: Segmentation Error using -O3 optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/56077] [4.6/4.7 Regression] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #25 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 22:02:26 UTC --- I am currently stuck on the three problems I described above and I cannot figure out a way to fix any of them: * How to reprocess tokens that need to

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-05 22:27:22 UTC --- Apparently the automatic xref didn't work, here is the commit: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-04/msg00244.html

[Bug fortran/56852] New: ICE on invalid: Bad array reference for an undeclared loop variable

$ gfortran minimal.f90 minimal.f90:5.14: read(0) (a(i),i=1,4) 1 Error: Symbol 'i' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type minimal.f90:1.12: program test 1 Internal Error at (1): gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.9.0 20130405

[Bug target/56792] AVR, internal compiler error on build avr-libc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56792 cynt6007 at vandals dot uidaho.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cynt6007 at

[Bug bootstrap/56853] New: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853 Bug #: 56853 Summary: GNU Fortran is not working Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/56853] GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56847] [4.8/4.9 Regression] '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|