http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
Bug #: 56889
Summary: =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a
polymorphic type gives compilation error messages
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
06:29:13 UTC ---
Anyway, started with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=192719
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
Bug #: 56890
Summary: Invalid fdtox %f8, %f9 on Sparc 64 Bits with -O2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata dot de 2013-04-09
08:38:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 29836
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29836
Slightly bigger test case with additional error for -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata dot de 2013-04-09
08:40:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 29837
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29837
Assembler file, problem in line 29 (fdtox %f8, %f9)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56891
Bug #: 56891
Summary: Bad static analysis on fread() gives spurious warning
on valid code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata dot de 2013-04-09
08:55:25 UTC ---
Forgot to post my configure line for gcc:
../gcc-4.7.2/configure
--prefix=/opt/build/tools/gcc-4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
09:25:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 29839
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29839
gcc49-pr56883.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-04-09 09:36:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
In addition I would like to remark that the precise declaration state of the
inherited initializer-list constructor in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881
Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jasonwucj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-04-09
09:59:20 UTC ---
Started with Richard Biener's http://gcc.gnu.org/r188261 aka PR53081 fix, which
added or improved memcpy recognition. I'm guess the new code fails to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
10:07:47 UTC ---
*** Bug 56830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51348
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56793
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56892
Bug #: 56892
Summary: dllexport prevents inline inside dll
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56886
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56892
--- Comment #1 from Geoff Worboys geoff at telesiscomputing dot com.au
2013-04-09 12:35:33 UTC ---
I realised I should add that I put the same code (adjusted for lack of C++11
support) through msvc v17, and can see it optimising the inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #5 from Max Reitz xanclic at gmail dot com 2013-04-09 13:02:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Just add -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to the already long list of
options
you need for compilation of certain routines in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-04-09 13:17:10 UTC ---
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, xanclic at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #5 from Max Reitz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #7 from Max Reitz xanclic at gmail dot com 2013-04-09 13:20:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, xanclic at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887
--- Comment #3 from fkrogh at mathalacarte dot com 2013-04-09 13:30:45 UTC ---
On 04/09/2013 06:06 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56887
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
--- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
13:33:53 UTC ---
I did simple investigation and found out that
1. Test is compiled successfully without selective scheduling, i.e. with
'-fschedule-insns' only.
2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56720
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881
devspam at moreofthesa dot me.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||amd64
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56885
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
14:22:28 UTC ---
Forgot to mention that __builtin_memset and function argument are not
interchangeable since both use the same register di.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-04-09
14:45:33 UTC ---
The test case is incomplete, as it lacks both main() and domalloc(). Please
add those (in a separate file if you like) so that the test case can be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698
--- Comment #5 from Mike Hommey mh+gcc at glandium dot org 2013-04-09
14:54:51 UTC ---
As noted in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854105#c4, fileIndex
is uint32_t, so 0 - 1 is UINT32_MAX, which makes the error valid. Now the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
14:57:25 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Apr 9 14:56:59 2013
New Revision: 197637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197637root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56893
Bug #: 56893
Summary: gcc-ar-4.7: Cannot find liblto_plugin.so on Darwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
15:02:01 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Apr 9 15:01:43 2013
New Revision: 197638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197638root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56894
Bug #: 56894
Summary: performance regression in gcc 4.7.x due to a +=
operation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56894
--- Comment #1 from Laurent Aflonsi laurent.alfonsi at st dot com 2013-04-09
15:23:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 29842
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29842
testcase to reproduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
Bug #: 56895
Summary: ICE: unexpected expression of kind arrow_expr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56893
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-09
16:52:07 UTC ---
I suppose PR23055 is another Dup?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33068
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13452
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37885
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15485
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
17:32:49 UTC ---
Mind if I take this one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:03:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Introduced by my http://gcc.gnu.org/r195051 , potential_constant_expression
returns true about it, because fun in a call expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:04:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Manuel, compile_file changed with this commit:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=118362
I seem to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
--- Comment #7 from Fredrick fredrickprashanth at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
18:10:34 UTC ---
HJ,
Thanks for pointing the patch.
The patch works. I tested it on x86-64.
Could this patch be integrated into the mainline GCC?
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:15:51 UTC ---
So:
@@ -4178,7 +4178,8 @@ cp_build_binary_op (location_t location,
}
else if (code0 == INTEGER_TYPE code1 == INTEGER_TYPE)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-09
18:33:26 UTC ---
It seems a bit weird not propagating complain..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:36:41 UTC ---
The reason for that is that I don't want errors being printed just when trying
to optimize to see if I should warn or not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:37:36 UTC ---
Though, there are several other maybe_constant_value calls now in cp/typeck.c,
and only 2 of them are guarded with !processing_template_decl.
So I guess
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:46:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 29844
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29844
gcc49-pr56895.patch
Untested complete patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09
18:49:28 UTC ---
OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #4 from Amali Praveena amalisperid at yahoo dot com 2013-04-09
19:02:32 UTC ---
Hi Jonathan,
The Stack in the example is an abstract type, so I'm explicitly saying
that this abstract type cannot be copied or moved; but the
-languages=c++ --disable-bootstrap
--with-gxx-include-dir=/home/ryan/foo/bar/usr/include/4.9.0
--with-sysroot=/home/ryan/foo/bar/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130409 (experimental) [trunk revision 197644] (GCC)
## - ##
## Platform. ##
~/gnu/gcc/trunk/tmp$ grep -nr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-04-09 19:13:55 UTC ---
This issue is not the right place for discussing programming idioms, but as a
last comment to the code: Your reference to PL alone does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #6 from Amali Praveena amalisperid at yahoo dot com 2013-04-09
19:23:38 UTC ---
Hi Daniel,
The Stack template is an abstract type, so I don't have to add default
constructor to it, do I? Since the abstract type can't be copied/moved,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Schepler aschepler at gmail dot com 2013-04-09
19:38:15 UTC ---
The diagnostic is easy in the direct case of delegating to the same
constructor, but difficult in the indirect case of multiple delegating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882
--- Comment #2 from xperience at interia dot pl 2013-04-09 20:03:30 UTC ---
Compiler ICE's during compile phase, without LTO.
Previous versions of GCC ie. 4.7.1 or 4.6.3 doesn't ICE,
and output of
gcc -O3 -mtune=native -march=native
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55487
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-04-09
22:55:27 UTC ---
IMHO, this should be closed as invalid since MacPorts is applying unnecessary
and invalid patches to gcc 4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-04-09
22:57:00 UTC ---
This has been filed with MacPorts as https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38732
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo