http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42669
Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
Bug ID: 57260
Summary: Generated R_MIPS_GOT_MIPS relocation for direct
function call while compiling with -O2 on MIPS N64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57261
Bug ID: 57261
Summary: [4.9 regression] libgcc_s.so always linked on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: critical
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (targ): Fix target name check.
Having to deal with the target_alias instead of the canonical form found
in target seems rather counterintuitive and fragile to me.
The ChangeLog entry is misleading, neither Pascal nor I have anything to
do
with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188
--- Comment #7 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com ---
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (targ): Fix target name check.
Having to deal with the target_alias instead of the canonical form found
in target seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #1 from Lee Duhem lee.duhem at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30102
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30102action=edit
the preprocessed glxdri.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
Lee Duhem lee.duhem at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57251
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57257
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57251
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57258
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57261
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57259
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57249
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57245
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57242
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
--- Comment #5 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Indeed, -fwrapv helps to run 254.gap successfully
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57251
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like sibcalls are incorrectly done.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57257
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57257
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86, alpha |x86,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #5 from Lee Duhem lee.duhem at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
Looks like sibcalls are incorrectly done.
Or maybe not since it is no longer a call but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
Bug ID: 57262
Summary: Optimize bound intrinsics with dim=var for rank one
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57251
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57257
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Lee Duhem from comment #5)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
Looks like sibcalls are incorrectly done.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45216
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 13 11:04:26 2013
New Revision: 198823
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198823root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45216
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57157
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45216
Bug 45216 depends on bug 57157, which changed state.
Bug 57157 Summary: Poor optimization of portable rotate idiom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57157
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-04-22 14:22:15 UTC ---
Following the recipe in comment #5, the following
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
What is expected if i (jjj) /= 1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57263
Bug ID: 57263
Summary: std::set with user-defined allocator - compile error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, I think I found the bug. Weakrefs are considered to be external but they
need to be duplicated. Does the following fix the problem?
Index: lto-partition.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57263
--- Comment #1 from Hristo Venev mustrumr97 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30104
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30104action=edit
A nice and short testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57263
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57263
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
N.B. the function that needs to be used is
std::pointer_traitsstd::allocator_traitsAllocator::pointer::pointer_to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57262
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30105
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30105action=edit
Draft patch (trans-intrinsic.c only, ubound/lbound only, untested)
PATCH: Draft patch for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Within the last week (20130503 to 20150510), the failure has changed
into an ICE:
-FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20091219 cp_lto_20091219_0.o-cp_lto_20091219_0.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57261
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-solaris2.10 |*-*-solaris2.{9,10}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
Bug ID: 57264
Summary: cld not emitted when string instructions used, and
'-mcld' on command line
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
I tried to apply suggested patch, but following gcc_assert was thrown:
https://github.com/marxin/gcc/blob/master/gcc/lto/lto-partition.c#L564
Callstack:
[build CXX]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926
--- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com ---
As bugzilla has a file size limit of 1000kB, here's a link to my dropbox
containing a zipped gch file that I believe is responsible for the crash.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Jason sent the issue to the reflector as c++std-core-13788 but I don't see any
indication it made it onto the issues list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28107
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Likewise does current ICC and OracleStudio and rather recent clang. I guess
this could use some further triage.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57242
--- Comment #6 from etherice scottbaldwin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
(In reply to etherice from comment #4)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
This is by design as -g changes the information
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Callstack:
[build CXX] store/source/stortree.cxx
lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_balanced_map, at lto/lto-partition.c:566
0x52004f lto_balanced_map()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 13 17:14:26 2013
New Revision: 198837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198837root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/57264
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
--- Comment #5 from thutt at vmware dot com ---
(In reply to Uros Bizjak from comment #3)
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 13 17:14:26 2013
New Revision: 198837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198837root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57265
Bug ID: 57265
Summary: Bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 in
libquadmath
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, I got a self contained testcase for this and indeed, it is safe to remove
that assert. In fact it is yet another problem with weakrefs: we have weakrefs
that are referring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to thutt from comment #5)
Does the same error exist in the 4.8 branch, or any other forward moving
branch?
No, 4.8 and newer branches already contain the original patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
Jason sent the issue to the reflector as c++std-core-13788 but I don't see
any indication it made it onto the issues list.
I'll poke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57196
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56998
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57253
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57253, which changed state.
Bug 57253 Summary: GCC ignores ref-qualifiers of pseudo-function types in
explicit specializations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57253
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57254
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57254, which changed state.
Bug 57254 Summary: Overload resolution failure when ref-qualified member
function templates are defined out-of-line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57254
What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57252, which changed state.
Bug 57252 Summary: GCC does not treat ref-qualified overload set as ambiguous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
Looks like the compilation goes further, but another gcc_assert is reached:
0x51f015 add_symbol_to_partition_1
../../gcc/lto/lto-partition.c:187
0x51f5ba lto_balanced_map()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57265
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57261
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahaas at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48233
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47163
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57263
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57101
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57266
Bug ID: 57266
Summary: [4.9 regression] comparison between signed and
unsigned integer expressions in fold_binary_loc breaks
m68k bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version:
-id
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin --with-tune=native
--with-march=native --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130513 (experimental) [trunk revision 198828] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
198815 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57266
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, sorry. I already had to play a bit with types to avoid similar painful
warnings on x86_64 and didn't check on other platforms. I think making low an
unsigned int would be fine (we
at -O2 or higher optimization levels.
It compiles successfully with gcc 4.8. I have not succeeded in reducing the
testcase to a manageable size.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc-trunk (GCC) 4.9.0 20130513 (experimental) [trunk revision 198822]
...
$ gcc-trunk -Os -w test.c
$ gcc-4.8 -O2 -w test.c
$ gcc-trunk -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57269
Bug ID: 57269
Summary: ICE in gcov_open, at gcov-io.c:82
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #7 from Lee Duhem lee.duhem at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
I think the following testcase is closer to my case:
int shouldbecall16(void);
int g(void) { shouldbecall16(); return 0; }
No it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50962
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org ---
This caused PR56707.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Lee Duhem from comment #7)
Would you like to check again about the first case? I think
these two case are different.
No they are both the same case:
ld
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57270
Bug ID: 57270
Summary: std::is_function ignores function ref-qualifiers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
95 matches
Mail list logo
