[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/57347] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for bitfield on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57347 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/57341] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -O3 in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57341 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/57328] Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug c++/41933] [c++0x] lambdas and variadic templates don't work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41933 Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57321] [4.8/4.9 Regression] static function call miscompiled at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57321 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug plugins/56754] some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 Duncan Sands baldrick at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baldrick at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57303] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] struct miscompiled at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 20 May 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- I

[Bug middle-end/56988] ipa-cp incorrectly propagates a field of an aggregate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dhazeghi at yahoo

[Bug tree-optimization/57321] [4.8/4.9 Regression] static function call miscompiled at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57321 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/57349] New: ICE on 253.perlbmk with pgo after r198096

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57349 Bug ID: 57349 Summary: ICE on 253.perlbmk with pgo after r198096 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/57344] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with pragma pack(1) and -O1 on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

Could not open source file limits.h

Hi, I work at an engineering company. Here, we use a Linux host where are installed licenses of an engineering commercial software, called Abaqus. Abaqus has a make procedure, that makes executable programs using a user soubroutine source code, or the correspondent object file. Here, Abaqus

[Bug libstdc++/57336] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Cannot INVOKE a reference_wrapper around an abstract type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57336 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57303] [4.7/4.8 Regression] struct miscompiled at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

Re: Could not open source file limits.h

This mailing list is for automated emails from our Bugzilla database, I suggest you send your mail to the gcc-help list instead.

[Bug libstdc++/57350] New: std::align missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350 Bug ID: 57350 Summary: std::align missing Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee:

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 --- Comment #9 from Roger Leigh rleigh at debian dot org --- It would be better if regex did not exist at all until functional. If I do regular autoconf header checks, plus a check to make sure that the needed types can be instantiated, then

[Bug libstdc++/57350] std::align missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350 --- Comment #1 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- Oh, here's a link to my version: http://code.google.com/p/c-plus/source/browse/src/util.h#50

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, we're well aware of all these problems. What I don't see is anyone proposing any useful solutions. If someone sends a patch to remove the regex header *without* removing

[Bug tree-optimization/57349] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 253.perlbmk with pgo after r198096

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57349 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 --- Comment #11 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com --- Sorry, I didn't mean to be harsh, and I did try to propose a solution. I can easily guess that there is no reason for it to be easy or even possible, but can't Boost people be

[Bug middle-end/57348] [TM] ICE for transaction expression in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57348 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] regex is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's a possibility, but personally I have other things to work on.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57344] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with pragma pack(1) and -O1 on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end

[Bug bootstrap/57340] [4.9 regression] stage2 miscompiles build/genconditions on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/57337] [4.9 Regression] 416.gamess ICE on x86 after r199048

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug lto/57334] ICE: in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug rtl-optimization/57344] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with pragma pack(1) and -O1 on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, the problem is definitely in store_split_bit_field. One possible fix is: --- gcc/expmed.c.jj2013-05-14 10:54:58.0 +0200 +++ gcc/expmed.c2013-05-21

[Bug fortran/57328] Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, you generally need -ffast-math here (or -ffinite-math-only at least).

[Bug tree-optimization/57326] Piecewise folding of operations on PHI nodes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57326 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/57322] [4.9 Regression] Segfault at -O1 in build_and_add_sum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57322 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/57319] [4.8 Regression]: bogus defaulted move assignment for ... calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for virtual base ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/57316] [4.8/4.9 regression] build failure in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57316 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug tree-optimization/57315] LTO and/or vectorizer performance regression on salsa20 core, 4.7-4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57315 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/57330] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed -O3 [tree-cfg.c:4792]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57330 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/57330] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed -O3 [tree-cfg.c:4792]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57330 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have a simple patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57328] Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) Yes, you generally need -ffast-math here (or -ffinite-math-only at least). SSE2 has an unord comparison instruction (aka isnan) though, so

[Bug libstdc++/57350] std::align missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Krauss from comment #0) C++11 §20.6.5 [ptr.align] remains unimplemented. Several years ago I published what now appears to be a compliant implementation, but

[Bug fortran/57328] Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/57331] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57331 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57344] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with pragma pack(1) and -O1 on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/57351] New: ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 Bug ID: 57351 Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/57328] Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug lto/57289] [4.9 Regression] ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug c++/57352] New: internal compiler error in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse at cp/parser.c:22878

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57352 Bug ID: 57352 Summary: internal compiler error in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse at cp/parser.c:22878 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/57341] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -O3 in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57341 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57330] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed -O3 [tree-cfg.c:4792]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57330 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c === --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/57347] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for bitfield on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57347 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) Fixed Thanks. Is the slowness of the sched2 pass tracked elsewhere? Or is that a normal speed for many volatile ops?

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 21 May 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgcc/57353] New: unrecognizable insn in decLibrary.c, ICE in extract_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57353 Bug ID: 57353 Summary: unrecognizable insn in decLibrary.c, ICE in extract_insn Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57354] New: Wrong run-time assignment of allocatable array of derived type with allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57354 Bug ID: 57354 Summary: Wrong run-time assignment of allocatable array of derived type with allocatable component Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/57354] Wrong run-time assignment of allocatable array of derived type with allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57354 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Fuka vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com --- valgrind ./a.out ==17600== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==17600== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==17600== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX;

[Bug plugins/57355] New: -march=native ivy bridge i5 shows tuning for sandy bridge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57355 Bug ID: 57355 Summary: -march=native ivy bridge i5 shows tuning for sandy bridge Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug plugins/56754] some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 --- Comment #6 from PaX Team pageexec at freemail dot hu --- (In reply to Duncan Sands from comment #5) Was there any feedback on this patch? sadly, no response so far (this bug is still UNCONFIRMED even), so it's probably not going to make

[Bug target/57355] -march=native ivy bridge i5 shows tuning for sandy bridge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57355 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|plugins |target ---

[Bug target/57355] -march=native ivy bridge i5 shows tuning for sandy bridge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57355 --- Comment #2 from croutch croutch at gmail dot com --- I have a. Intel Core i5 3570K 3,4Ghz (Ivy Bridge) I use gentoo linux with gcc 4.7.3 and those settings. CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} MAKEOPTS=-j4 From manual.

[Bug target/57355] -march=native ivy bridge i5 shows tuning for sandy bridge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57355 --- Comment #3 from croutch croutch at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 30155 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30155action=edit gcc-native-ivy-detect This patch is not from me and not tested by me.

[Bug c++/57352] internal compiler error in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse at cp/parser.c:22878

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57352 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Most likely related to PR51908

[Bug c/57356] New: gcc-4.8: SSE2 instructions generated with '-mno-sse2'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57356 Bug ID: 57356 Summary: gcc-4.8: SSE2 instructions generated with '-mno-sse2' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30156 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30156action=edit patch

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Under test.

[Bug c/57357] New: Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 Bug ID: 57357 Summary: Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/57347] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for bitfield on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57347 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/57289] [4.9 Regression] ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- hmmm... now I'm getting a different ICE: internal compiler error: in arm_dbx_register_number, at config/arm/arm.c:25834 a gcc_unreachable () is reached. If I print out the regno argument to

[Bug tree-optimization/57349] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 253.perlbmk with pgo after r198096

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57349 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase, fails with -O -fbranch-probabilities struct __jmp_buf_tag { }; typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1]; typedef struct cop COP; typedef struct gv GV; struct cop

[Bug tree-optimization/57303] [4.7/4.8 Regression] struct miscompiled at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7) On Mon, 20 May 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: +/* Remove *p = *p. */ +if (!inplace TREE_CODE_CLASS (subcode) ==

[Bug tree-optimization/53991] _mm_popcnt_u64 fails with -O3 -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991 --- Comment #7 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- A piece of code is tm_pure if, roughly, it doesn't need any instrumentation (e.g., in contrast to memory loads/stores). In the test case, I suppose that the compiler detects that it is tm_pure,

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #5 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- If I print out the regno argument to arm_dbx_register_number, it's 272 which seem to me like it could be reg number in DWARF numbering? yes it is. strange, I can't see this new failure, with a

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199140root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-05-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/57318 * tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to chrbr from comment #5) If I print out the regno argument to arm_dbx_register_number, it's 272 which seem to me like it could be reg number in DWARF numbering? yes it is.

[Bug fortran/57354] Wrong run-time assignment of allocatable array of derived type with allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57354 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Dvorak rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org --- I will have a look.

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #7 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #6) (In reply to chrbr from comment #5) If I print out the regno argument to arm_dbx_register_number, it's 272 which seem to me like it could be reg

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to chrbr from comment #7) thanks for catching it. No problem, thanks for fixing :)

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #9 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- no, in fact, you confused me. The patch was committed correctly :-) On a side note, in your patch you say: - t = one_reg_loc_descriptor (REGNO (XVECEXP (regs, 0, i)), + reg = REGNO

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to chrbr from comment #9) no, in fact, you confused me. The patch was committed correctly :-) On a side note, in your patch you say: - t = one_reg_loc_descriptor (REGNO

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- In any case, if you have Err... stray line. Ignor that.

[Bug tree-optimization/57358] New: segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358 Bug ID: 57358 Summary: segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0)) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #12 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 30156 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30156 patch Index: arm.c === --- arm.c

[Bug tree-optimization/57331] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57331 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #13 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 30156 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30156 patch ndex: arm.c === --- arm.c(revision

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #14 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- In that post (comment 6) I was citing the patch you attached to this report, which says: OK that's clear. Wrong attachment like you said. Presumably that attached part should have been

[Bug target/57356] gcc-4.8: SSE2 instructions generated with '-mno-sse2'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57356 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/57340] [4.9 regression] stage2 miscompiles build/genconditions on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340 --- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'll take a look. Ramana

[Bug debug/57351] ICE: internal compiler error: in dbx_reg_number, at dwarf2out.c:10507 on arm-none-eabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to chrbr from comment #14) In that post (comment 6) I was citing the patch you attached to this report, which says: OK that's clear. Wrong attachment like you said.

[Bug target/57357] Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- hubicka at ucw dot cz gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- URL:

[Bug target/57357] Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 --- Comment #2 from thutt at vmware dot com --- Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is disabled? SSE is an x86-specific hardware implementation and has nothing to do with language validity from my standpoint.

[Bug target/57357] Error with '-mno-sse' and include wchar.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thutt from comment #2) Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is disabled? SSE is an x86-specific hardware implementation and has nothing

  1   2   >