Dear gcc-bugs,
We just develop new device special for library book distributors.
If you don't know where to find new products and how to make profits,
Pls contact us for your interesting immediately.
visit site at
http://www.emetal.tw/protect/MF001.htm for library cleaner
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Guillaume Melquiond guillaume.melquiond at inria dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems to have been fixed with the Symtab cleanups 2/17 - merge alias code fix
(r199577) or possibly with the same fix as for PR57467 (r199582).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Bug ID: 57503
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply
routine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1)
Created attachment 30242 [details]
.expand dump
Notice that in rot(), long D.1484_5 is unused and instead the 32-bit value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504
Bug ID: 57504
Summary: invalid this pointer passed in call to virtual
function that returns a struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57502
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
Bug ID: 57505
Summary: [C++11] destructor of std::function should be noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I thought this was fixed for 4.8 by bug 54295.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
--- Comment #1 from Frank Heckenbach f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de ---
Created attachment 30244
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30244action=edit
Test case for enable_shared_from_this
The same applies to std::enable_shared_from_this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
This is fixed in gcc 4.9 trunk and I believe it has already been fixed in gcc
4.8 due to bug #50043.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30245
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30245action=edit
cecky2.c: More test case
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
I thought this was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30246
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30246action=edit
cecky2.s: Addembler dump with -dP from 4.8.0 (experimental) 2013-03-06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57506
Bug ID: 57506
Summary: [avr] Some devices are present twice in avr-mcus.def
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57506
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asmwarrior at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #4 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
This is what I get when I enable the python stack print:
set python print-stack full
[debug] set python print-stack full
[debug]cb_gdb:
p m_Headers
[debug] p m_Headers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #5 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
p /r m_Headers
[debug] p /r m_Headers
[debug]$5 = (StringSet ) @0x116d0bc4: {_M_t = {_M_impl =
{std::allocatorstd::_Rb_tree_nodewxString =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
--- Comment #10 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
I'm working on a new patch that addresses the first problem, the failure in
test().
I think the second failure is not in test1() at all, and has nothing to do with
26 matches
Mail list logo
