http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with VTV merge: r201555.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
decide_is_symbol_needed has
/* Double check that no one output the function into assembly file early. */
but it gets
function_decl 0x7fedaeb5f500 _GLOBAL__sub_I.00099_vt.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 07:53:05 2013
New Revision: 202197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202197root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #18 from Krzysztof Strasburger strasbur at chkw386 dot
ch.pwr.wroc.pl ---
I have found that tree-fre, tree-pre and tree-dse have to be disabled in order
to generate correctly working code at all optimization levels (both C and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com ---
vxworks target : . vs $ in asm names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56805
--- Comment #7 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com ---
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-linux |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips-vxworks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This looks like a duplicate of pr50463 (and may be more).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Duplicate of pr53086 also.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 09:48:27 2013
New Revision: 202202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202202root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:00:06 2013
New Revision: 202204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202204root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think that
tem = get_inner_reference (to, bitsize, bitpos, offset, mode1,
unsignedp, volatilep, true);
if (TREE_CODE (to) ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:12:19 2013
New Revision: 202208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202208root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:12:44 2013
New Revision: 202209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202209root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:19:16 2013
New Revision: 202210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202210root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH, ice-on-valid-code,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This has been fixed between r199406 (ICE) and r199412 (OK). r199409 seems the
most likely candidate.
If nobody care to understand why, I'll close this PR as fixed in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Bug ID: 58304
Summary: gcc dev branch compilation Failed at libstdc++-v3
(used gcc 4.7.3 to compile)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #26 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
I think that
tem = get_inner_reference (to, bitsize, bitpos, offset, mode1,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Bug ID: 58305
Summary: Deprecation warning for class not raised when not
assigning to a variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
Bug ID: 58306
Summary: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter
(X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:14:58 2013
New Revision: 202215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202215root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:16:28 2013
New Revision: 202216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202216root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:18:34 2013
New Revision: 202217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202217root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Wienke languitar at semipol dot de ---
class ToBeDeprecated {
} __attribute__ ((deprecated (deprecated!)));
int main() {
ToBeDeprecated();
ToBeDeprecated x;
return 0;
}
The first use does not issue the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58076
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Bug ID: 58307
Summary: Bogus error 'Function requires an argument list'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem at mailcity dot com ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue.
Surely, but I had to choose something not knowing what to choose.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33906
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50548
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #0)
produces (with 4.7, 4.8 and trunk) the error message
real(point) :: this
1
Error: Function 'point' requires an argument list at (1)
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
4.6.4 gives
Error: Syntax error in structure constructor at (1)
and 4.7.3
Error: Function 'point' requires an argument list at (1)
Ok,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #193 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am building firefox with -O3 and get no undefined symbols. Can you, please,
relink with -Wl,--no-demangle --save-temps -fdump-ipa-all and try to look up
the missing symbol in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54072
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mark's patch is in binutils 2.23.x, but the testcase is still failing on
x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57616
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51629
rob.desbois at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob.desbois at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #194 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #193)
I am building firefox with -O3 and get no undefined symbols. Can you,
please, relink with -Wl,--no-demangle --save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru ---
c++11 mode is used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58309
Bug ID: 58309
Summary: spurious parameter set but not used warning in cilk
plus array code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
Bug ID: 58308
Summary: Segmentation fault: internal compiler error: in
make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Bug ID: 58310
Summary: Allocatable component arrays: Wrong code after calling
a subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As James had already pointed out - and as Richard Maine confirmed in a follow
up, the code violates the following constraint of Fortran 2003:
C614 (R612) There shall not be more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-202196-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130903 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
rogerio.araujo at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerio.araujo at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
If your target uses glibc, you don't need libssp anyway.
libssp is used by LINK_SSP_SPEC if TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP is not
defined. TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #3 from Brooks Moses brooks at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, Joseph. This is a straightforward Linux target using glibc, so I'll
investigate to see why the binary in question is relying on libssp rather than
glibc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #4 from Caroline Tice cmtice at google dot com ---
I am looking into this now. I will update this bug when I know more.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #1 from Brooks Moses brooks at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Jakub, I added you to the cc list in hopes that you may be able to comment on
the original reasoning for this being a runtime check rather than simply a
check for the ability to link a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid, diagnostic |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
Bug ID: 58312
Summary: libssp configure check for usable vsnprintf is
broken on cross-compilers.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is fixed for cris-elf in (201978:202144] apparently r202111 as also
obvious from the message at gcc-patches. It's probably fixed everywhere. Can
Pat the reporter or Jan the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #4 from Brooks Moses brooks at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It turns out that we do need these symbols in libssp despite having a nice
plain x86-Linux environment. We've got some precompiled blobs from
who-knows-where that want the LIBSSP_1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
Sean Santos quantheory at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Spurious error when using |[F2008] BOZ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|sgk at troutmask dot apl.washingto |
85 matches
Mail list logo