http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Bug ID: 60644
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Build of i686-pc-linux-android is
broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If SYS_gettid is not defined, then it is a bug in the bionic libc headers as
NR_gettid is defined in the kernel headers.
Also pthread_yield should be defined in pthread.h if it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well pthread_yield should be replaced with the POSIX version: sched_yield()
instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
That (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
Well pthread_yield should be replaced with the POSIX version: sched_yield()
instead.
Right.. the attached patch cured the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32443
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32443action=edit
Renaming ANDROID to __ANDROID__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
Bug ID: 60645
Summary: locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale does not handle
__gthread_once error codes.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
--- Comment #10 from hongxu jia hongxu.jia at windriver dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
Works for me with an unmodified GCC 4.8.2.
So please try removing all of the Open-embedded patches since one of them is
causing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
Bug ID: 60646
Summary: Investigate improved complex division algorithms
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45020
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60636
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We should instead instrument ABS_EXPR (you can instrument that as u 0 ? u :
-u of course).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60641
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60331
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 25 09:30:10 2014
New Revision: 208806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208806root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60331
* semantics.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The only error code specified by POSIX is EINVAL which cannot happen here,
because the pthread_once_t is statically initialized and controlled entirely by
the library.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Bug ID: 60647
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at
ipa-prop.c:2112
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Mar 25 10:57:07 2014
New Revision: 208809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208809root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-25 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
__vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Richard, this started with r207879.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 25 11:43:03 2014
New Revision: 208811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208811root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Bug ID: 60648
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) in
expand_binop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60649
Bug ID: 60649
Summary: [ASAN] Bogus 'y' may be used uninitialized warning
(affects bootstrap-asan)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Hmm,
I debugged a bit and found this:
the problem starts in gfc_get_function_type
it is first called on sym-name = make_real,
and then recursively again on the same sym.
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue Mar 25 12:06:17 2014
New Revision: 208813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208813root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/58013
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's even wrong-code it seems. IPA SRA is confused about the KR style
functions and
static fn3 (dpy, winInfo, visrgn) struct _XDisplay *dpy;
{
int b = fn1 (0, winInfo);
fn4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
Bug ID: 60650
Summary: [ARM] LRA ICE assign_by_spills
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #10)
gfortran currently generates when it does not know the explicit interface
something like:
float funct(...)
note that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #1 from Yvan Roux yvan.roux at linaro dot org ---
testcase is to big to be attached... reducing...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60651
Bug ID: 60651
Summary: Mode switching instructions are sometimes emitted in
the wrong order
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60651
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32447
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32447action=edit
patch
The attached patch implements this aforementioned insertion at the end
of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
We're getting non-canonical as part of the index computation in do_tablejump:
(gdb) p debug_rtx (index)
(plus:SI (mult:SI (const_int 0 [0])
(const_int 4 [0x4]))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #38 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 tests fail on hppa*-*-hpux11* (4.8 and 4.9):
(en15.0) 9.E+03 expected: 10.E+03
(en15.0) 9.E+03 expected:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Bug ID: 60653
Summary: [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in
lra
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #39 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 tests fail on hppa*-*-hpux11* (4.8 and 4.9):
...
After r208780 (for 4.9, not backported yet to 4.8)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fails with -O1 and -O2, works with -O0. fails with both -marm/-mthumb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seen with a build of the paw package in Debian/unstable and Ubuntu/trusty.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #2 from Yvan Roux yvan.roux at linaro dot org ---
Created attachment 32449
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32449action=edit
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60652
Bug ID: 60652
Summary: System.OS_Constants CRTSCTS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60654
Bug ID: 60654
Summary: format warnings don't work with PROGMEM/PSTR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Bug ID: 60655
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid
expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Bug ID: 60656
Summary: [4.8/4.9 regression] x86 vectorization produces wrong
code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
Charles Baylis charles.baylis at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The expression being put out is :
(const:SI (not:SI (symbol_ref:SI (*.LANCHOR0) [flags 0x182])))
#0 0x003105033410 in exit () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Command lines I was using to reproduce this with a cross compiler.
./cc1 -g -mthumb -fdata-sections -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mfloat-abi=hard -O2
-march=armv7-a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Created attachment 32448
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32448action=edit
possible fix
Ok, the attached patch seems to fix at least the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28575
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Bug ID: 60657
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its
constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seen with every package using this boost header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 25 16:50:54 2014
New Revision: 208815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208815root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/35449
* doc/extend.texi (Example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #17 from Mircea Namolaru mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr ---
Yes, data dependencies computation is expensive in the polyehdral model
and it could take considerable time - but it is worrying that in too many
cases fails to provide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Bug ID: 60658
Summary: std::atomicT* is unexpectedly not lock-free
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Grosser grosser at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mircea Namolaru from comment #17)
Yes, data dependencies computation is expensive in the polyehdral model
and it could take considerable time - but it is worrying
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Bug ID: 60659
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in get_polymorphic_call_info, at
ipa-devirt.c:1292
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60375
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 25 18:00:37 2014
New Revision: 208817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208817root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60375
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60628
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 25 18:00:30 2014
New Revision: 208816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208816root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60628
* decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Mar 25 18:22:41 2014
New Revision: 208818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208818root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-25 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #6 from devurandom at gmx dot net ---
Did anyone figure out what's going on? Did the gdb log bring new insights?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60642
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60654
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60660
Bug ID: 60660
Summary: alloca function for inlines that allocates on caller
stack
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60660
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is much harder than you think really. since you have to move all the
arguments of the callee function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60660
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
without multiple evaluation of the variable arguments as a macro would.
You can use statement expressions with typeof extension to get around the issue
of multiple evaluation issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.3
Target
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo