http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60697
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 07:57:48 2014
New Revision: 209237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209237root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* s-osinte-android.ads:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the mess, can you try after the latest change?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50535
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781
--- Comment #11 from Laura C lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk ---
Thank you very much for your help - I will fix the curly quotes and hopefully
run the executable successfully when I get home from work later.
Apologies that it was my mistake.
Your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60732
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Mike, what do you think is the best solution here? We could use Dominique's
patch with a comment to the effect that New-ABI symbols are always emitted
on Linux, but only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60791
Bug ID: 60791
Summary: missing warning about uninitialized local variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #15 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hi Eric,
The compiler builds happily now.
It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
flawlessly (with the current setup ACATS takes hours because each test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60792
Bug ID: 60792
Summary: bogus buffer overflow warning and abort on static
flexible array member in a child object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60730
John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnugcc at marino dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60791
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominik.muth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dimitris Papavasiliou from comment #6)
I don't mean to dictate the coding-style others should use of course but
still it seems to me like a small price to pay for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The compiler builds happily now.
Great, thanks for the quick feedback.
It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
flawlessly (with the current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60792
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 9 11:37:14 2014
New Revision: 209241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209241root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-09 Cong Hou co...@google.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459
--- Comment #7 from Murali murali.marimekala at gmail dot com ---
Hi Ramana,
Thanks for your response and inputs.
We will try working out a testcase to reproduce this issue.
Murali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32564|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #209 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #208)
Both issues from Comment 201 were fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00338.html
No, only the first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60505
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #17 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hi Eric,
In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
c74004a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks good to me, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
Bug ID: 60793
Summary: Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172
libstdc++ tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60794
Bug ID: 60794
Summary: 25 libstdc++ tests are missing '{
dg-require-debug-mode }'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #19 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires unwind
support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
So this patch was proposed 9 months ago
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires
unwind support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
Yes, it does, but it first needs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60792
Attila Balint abalint21 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 14:54:29 2014
New Revision: 209244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209244root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/54040
PR ada/59346
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59346
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 14:54:29 2014
New Revision: 209244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209244root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/54040
PR ada/59346
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Bug ID: 60795
Summary: Wrong length when allocating character array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60794
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why do you think they require debug mode?
Those tests are supposed to run in normal mode, that's why they explicitly use
debug/vector and __gnu_debug::vector (which is how to use the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
--- gcc/symtab.c.jj2014-03-21 22:23:43.0 +0100
+++ gcc/symtab.c2014-04-09 17:37:40.709523997 +0200
@@ -1312,9 +1312,13 @@ symtab_get_symbol_partitioning_class (sy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |libstdc++
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
--- Comment #2 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
hmmm, that would imply that all the dragonfly patches that we've been carrying
for years (including ada patches) would need to go in first.
DragonFly does not, and has never, built out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, the problem is that one comdat group has two functions:
_ZNK19MutableIntegerValue18isValidNativeValueEi/0 (isValidNativeValue)
@0x76adfe18
Type: function definition analyzed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32574
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32574action=edit
WIP patch displaying IPA-CP information aout clones
This is an untested and very much
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Won't that break say -g -O2 -Wall reporting with say:
static inline void
foo (char *p)
{
__builtin___memcpy_chk (p, abc, 3, __builtin_object_size (p, 0));
}
static inline void
bar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60794
--- Comment #2 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hmmm, only 3 of the 25 files use debug/vector and __gnu_debug::vector
23_containers/vector/debug/assign4_neg.cc
23_containers/vector/debug/construct4_neg.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, perhaps to make the change conservative enough for 4.9, might be best to
not append anything now, and only look at DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (recurse on it)
if !DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
I mean, DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN is set also for inlines, fnsplit created
functions and many other cases, printing clone after the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60796
Bug ID: 60796
Summary: Default move constructor not generated by explicit
template instantiaion (C++11)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
I've tried a couple of things to fix this:
- Fill in DECL_CONTEXT to current_fn_decl in cilk
- Fill in DECL_CONTEXT for VAR_DECLs when creating the nested wrapper
No banana so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #14)
It doesn't seem to make sense to keep function
but optimize out the thunk as we would do now (even w/o LTO)
Right. When we emit a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
It is not clear to me why you want to print clone at all. It is an
internal detail.
Imagine a function void f(unsigned a, unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Following works for me and shows no new errors in regtesting. Not sure it is a
good idea though...
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-array-notation.c b/gcc/c/c-array-notation.c
index
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
You're right. It works in C++.
That's similar to my earlier patch, but I didn't comment out the other check
like you did. If commenting out the check work it would seem right to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773
--- Comment #5 from Cong Hou congh at google dot com ---
Hi Jakub
Thank you very much for the commit!
thanks,
Cong
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:39 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32575
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32575action=edit
patch
This patch forces the decay for C++. We don't need to do anything for C, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Yes, I was going to post it after complete testing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60796
--- Comment #1 from Brian Freyburger brian.freyburger at blandertechnologies
dot com ---
Sorry, see code change below. (if you explicitly instantiate in the
compilation unit which uses the move construction, the compilation sucec
(In reply to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60789
--- Comment #1 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
Found the culprit. I had CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS for gcc ./configure. Thus
probably setting CFLAGS causes `-lm` to vanish in libstdc++v3 math conftests.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #6)
Yes, I was going to post it after complete testing
You should set DECL_SEEN_IN_BIND_EXPR_P when setting
DECL_CONTEXT, similar to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #6)
Yes, I was going to post it after complete testing
You should set DECL_SEEN_IN_BIND_EXPR_P when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60797
Bug ID: 60797
Summary: gcc hangs with error: only weak aliases are supported
in this configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Apr 9 19:42:14 2014
New Revision: 209250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209250root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-04-09 Bill Schmidt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60797
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60798
Bug ID: 60798
Summary: Access checking of template alias not done at the
point of use
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like this isn't about whether the struct is anonymous, we warn even on
say:
struct A { int a, b; };
struct B { struct A a; } b = { .a.a = 1, .a.b = 1 };
c.c:2:19: warning:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60467
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
We could add this patch to avoid the original problem:
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/cilk.c b/gcc/c-family/cilk.c
index f2179dfc..a535948 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/cilk.c
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60799
Bug ID: 60799
Summary: access checking within injected friend functions does
not happen in the context of the enclosing class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60467
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60798
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60800
Bug ID: 60800
Summary: -Ofast -ffast-math -march=corei7 -mtune=generic
miscompiles 178.galgel in SPEC CPU 2K
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60800
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Ofast -ffast-math |-Ofast -ffast-math
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60789
David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59346
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 23:18:28 2014
New Revision: 209257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209257root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/54040
PR ada/59346
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 23:18:28 2014
New Revision: 209257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209257root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/54040
PR ada/59346
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926
--- Comment #14 from lailavrazda1979 at gmail dot com ---
Why wait? I'm not hugely opposed, but bugfixes are bugfixes, and one more fixed
bug makes a better 4.9 release, right?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60801
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This sounds like you are running out of stack space. a 515x515 array of 4 byte
wide is over a meg of data which is too big for the stack.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Sean Santos quantheory at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60802
Bug ID: 60802
Summary: jump2 pass fails to do cfgcleanup
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60802
linzj manjian2006 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60803
Bug ID: 60803
Summary: Trivial example of overloading in the presence of
inheritance fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60801
Ryan genflot at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60804
Bug ID: 60804
Summary: Another CilkPlus ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:8335
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60803
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
95 matches
Mail list logo
