http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Bug ID: 61108
Summary: gcc 4.8.2 generates incorrect integer arithmetic at O3
(ok at O2)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The tree level looks fine at least to me:
vect_val_8.15_127 = MEM[(const uint32_t *)vectp_vals.14_85];
vect_patt_47.16_128 = WIDEN_MULT_EVEN_EXPR vect_val_8.15_127, { 613566757,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61100
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61109
Bug ID: 61109
Summary: ICE [4.10 Regression] in fortran/trans-array.c on
dimension 0 arrays
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ignore comment #9, everything seems to work now.
This passes:
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} tsan.exp'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #10)
also, just curious: are such fixes supposed to be accompanied with
regression tests?
You're right of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61109
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61082
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu May 8 08:00:21 2014
New Revision: 210203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210203root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61028
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61081
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #1 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm happy to take a look at this, but I have no access to an s390 ESA mode
environment, so will struggle to make much progress.
If it is the case that s390 relies on PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED == 0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 7 May 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this leads to:
if (!opts_set-x_warn_unused_but_set_variable)
handle_generated_option (opts, opts_set,
OPT_Wunused_but_set_variable,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3)
this leads to:
if (!opts_set-x_warn_unused_but_set_variable)
handle_generated_option (opts, opts_set,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61084
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
the gnat.dg/outer_agg_bitfield_constructor.adb problem.
In a build tree from 10 days ago, compiling
nested_agg_bitfield_constructor.adb took ca.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
this works and fixes the issue. running the full testsuite now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Sure, I'll do that momentarily. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61097
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu May 8 12:11:14 2014
New Revision: 210210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210210root=gccview=rev
Log:
Don't build libgcc-unwind.map with --disable-shared (PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61097
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Could you please provide details on your configuration? AFAICS, the
lto-plugin isn't ever built in a native Darwin configuration.
So please provide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5)
this works and fixes the issue. running the full testsuite now.
It would be nice to add this testcase (-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please take the patch as yours. I don't have time at the moment to do all the
submission+pinging. (And perhaps it could be backported to GCC 4.9 and 4.8. It
is really a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59472
Paul Scruby paul at scruby dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul at scruby dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Thu May 8 13:17:01 2014
New Revision: 210212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210212root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-08 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59472
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
Reassigning to libstdc++ because the warnings seem to say the truth.
They do tell the truth.
We use char arrays for good reason (see the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59472
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That should work for the streambufs, it's not so simple for the standard stream
objects though, as they're user-visible and we declared their (pretend) types
in iostream.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61110
Bug ID: 61110
Summary: Simplify value_replacement in phiopt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and
fold_binary_loc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ville, has EWG taken a look at this issue? I'm sorry this didn't come up in
the C++14 context, as it would have made sense to fix this when we were adding
deduced return types.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
Ville, has EWG taken a look at this issue? I'm sorry this didn't come up in
Not yet. The handling of Extension-status Core
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
Bug ID: 61112
Summary: Simple example triggers false-positive
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is with r210212.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
--- Comment #1 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
$ gcc -O2 -Wall this.c
this.c: In function ‘void foo(int, int, int)’:
this.c:13:10: warning: ‘w’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
p = w;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61113
Bug ID: 61113
Summary: Mark private methods hidden automatically
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 8 14:30:56 2014
New Revision: 210217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210217root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-05-08 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Starts with r210113, ie the wide-int merge. Though that may just expose the
latent problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61113
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jpakkane from comment #0)
That is, both the private and public methods are exported in the symbol
table. The latter is wasteful because private methods can only be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I rather suspect a merge error. The following two need to match to not
oscillate:
/* Minimize the number of bits set in C1, i.e. C1 := C1 ~C2,
unless (C1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61113
--- Comment #2 from jpakkane at gmail dot com ---
In that case it would fail. But you can make it work by doing this (assuming
compilation with -fvisibility=hidden):
class __attribute__ ((visibility(default))) Thing final {
public:
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am not aware of any specific workaround. I assume that if you could avoid the
function pointer, you would. G++ exception handling implementation on AIX is
fragile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
-cprop addv.c
it generates this code:
foo:
movw0, 0
ret
.sizefoo, .-foo
.identGCC: (unknown) 4.10.0 20140508 (experimental)
which is wrong!
Scalar evolution seems to hide this bug - if -fno-tree-scev-cprop is removed,
it works fine:
.typefoo, %function
foo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry I meant it fixes this on aarch64_be.
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c execution test
) 4.10.0 20140508 (experimental)
module m
implicit none
private
type, abstract :: tt
contains
generic :: gen_f = ff
! Notice: eliminating the non_overridable everything works
procedure, pass(this), non_overridable :: ff
end type tt
contains
subroutine ff(this)
class(tt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61112
--- Comment #2 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
Relevant contents of -fdump-tree-uninit:
[WORKLIST]: Update worklist with phi: w_2 = PHI w_1(5), 10(10)
[CHECK]: examining phi: w_2 = PHI w_1(5), 10(10)
[CHECK] Found def edge 1 in w_1 = PHI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58066
--- Comment #6 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Thu May 8 16:44:52 2014
New Revision: 210222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210222root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2014-05-08 Wei Mi w...@google.com
PR target/58066
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
Patch:
--cut here--
Index: config/i386/i386.c
===
--- config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #15 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
I think HLE is the part of TSX.
It is and should be removed from the list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
--- Comment #9 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cbaylis
Date: Thu May 8 17:06:04 2014
New Revision: 210227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210227root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-08 Charles Baylis charles.bay...@linaro.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
--- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cbaylis
Date: Thu May 8 17:06:01 2014
New Revision: 210226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210226root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-08 Charles Baylis charles.bay...@linaro.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
--- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cbaylis
Date: Thu May 8 17:06:01 2014
New Revision: 210226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210226root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-08 Charles Baylis charles.bay...@linaro.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #15)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
I think HLE is the part of TSX.
It is and should be removed from the list.
OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61101
--- Comment #19 from Maxime Boissonneault maxime.boissonneault at calculquebec
dot ca ---
Hi again,
I notice in the first line that leads to an error of bits/c++config.h not found
:
/software6/src/gcc-4.8.2-build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57394
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 8 17:17:06 2014
New Revision: 210228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210228root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/57394
* include/bits/ios_base.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not sure about that, after all we enable PTA_HLE even for generic.
The point is whether it might be beneficial to emit the HLE prefixes or not, on
CPUs that never have HLE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57394
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
I'm not sure about that, after all we enable PTA_HLE even for generic.
The point is whether it might be beneficial to emit the HLE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13868
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61116
Bug ID: 61116
Summary: redundant DWARF with VLAs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61077
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu May 8 17:42:09 2014
New Revision: 210229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210229root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61077
c-family/
* c-common.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32761
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32761action=edit
Pre-processed file that causes ICE
The pre-processed file crashes both 4.9 branch and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61077
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #19 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
The prefix can be emitted for any CPU, you don't need a flag for that. However,
you cannot emit the XTEST instruction unless the CPU has HLE or RTM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61053
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu May 8 18:19:09 2014
New Revision: 210230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210230root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61053
c-family/
* c-common.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61053
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13860
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 8 18:30:14 2014
New Revision: 210231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210231root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/13860
* include/std/fstream
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61117
Bug ID: 61117
Summary: Manual uses term open source but should say free
software
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13860
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61116
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|redundant DWARF with VLAs |redundant DWARF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61117
--- Comment #1 from Joshua Gay jgay at gnu dot org ---
Index: faq.html
===
--- faq.html(revision 210229)
+++ faq.html(working copy)
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
/p/td/trtr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #20 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #19)
The prefix can be emitted for any CPU, you don't need a flag for that.
However, you cannot emit the XTEST instruction unless the CPU has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 8 19:02:28 2014
New Revision: 210233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210233root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61092
* config/alpha/alpha.c: Include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32960
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61117
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 8 19:13:10 2014
New Revision: 210234
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210234root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59952
* config/i386/i386.c (PTA_HASWELL): Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #22 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 8 19:23:45 2014
New Revision: 210236
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210236root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59952
* config/i386/i386.c (PTA_HASWELL): Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
--- Comment #23 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 8 19:32:34 2014
New Revision: 210237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210237root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59952
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Sorry, personal issue taking an enormous amount of my time right now. I have a
fully tested patch and just need to twiddle the attached test into an
executable testcase for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009
--- Comment #10 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #9)
Sorry, personal issue taking an enormous amount of my time right now. I
have a fully tested patch and just need to twiddle the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Roland Schulz roland at rschulz dot eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roland at rschulz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61117
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu May 8 19:49:26 2014
New Revision: 210239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210239root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-08 Joshua Gay j...@gnu.org
PR
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
