[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #5 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com --- This issue was predicted back to when _Unwind_Backtrace was enabled on ARM. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-08/msg00235.html This will keep going if the personality routine returns

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3) Not having a copyright assignment won't interfere with this patch being applied. I'm waiting for confirmation from Janne that I can revert

[Bug c++/62222] 'tuple_element_t' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/62222] 'tuple_element_t' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- GCC 4.9 has only partial C++14 support.

[Bug c++/62222] 'tuple_element_t' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 --- Comment #3 from tower120 tower120 at gmail dot com --- Oh I see. Well, what gcc version is that, then? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/339121/

[Bug c++/62222] 'tuple_element_t' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to tower120 from comment #3) Oh I see. Well, what gcc version is that, then? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/339121/ 5.x.

[Bug tree-optimization/62217] Extra iteration peeled during cunroll. Makes VRP warn.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62217 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/62223] New: error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 Bug ID: 62223 Summary: error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

[Bug tree-optimization/62217] DOM confuses complete unrolling which in turn causes VRP to warn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62217 --- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- As long as I understand `remove_exits_and_undefined_stmts' iterate loop boundaries set marking `unreachable' stmts w/ impossible bounds. For the example we have: - for true edge

[Bug tree-optimization/62220] missed optimization wrt module for loop variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62220 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/62224] New: Possible regression in gcc-4.9-20140820

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224 Bug ID: 62224 Summary: Possible regression in gcc-4.9-20140820 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/62224] Possible regression in gcc-4.9-20140820

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224 --- Comment #1 from Chris Clayton chris2553 at googlemail dot com --- Created attachment 33377 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33377action=edit Preprocessed source file ETOOBIG on uncompressed attachment. Now compressed with

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/62225] New: DW_AT_location for local variable is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62225 Bug ID: 62225 Summary: DW_AT_location for local variable is missing Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug debug/62225] DW_AT_location for local variable is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62225 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- I bet if you remove register, it will work. Or compile with variable tracking turned on.

[Bug other/62008] CilkPlus Array Notation ICE in build_array_notation_ref when trying to build a multidimensional array from a pointer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62008 --- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Fri Aug 22 09:37:01 2014 New Revision: 214305 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214305root=gccview=rev Log: PR other/62008 gcc/c/ * c-parser.c

[Bug other/62008] CilkPlus Array Notation ICE in build_array_notation_ref when trying to build a multidimensional array from a pointer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62008 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Fri Aug 22 09:40:13 2014 New Revision: 214306 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214306root=gccview=rev Log: PR other/62008 gcc/c/ * c-parser.c

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 --- Comment #2 from tower120 tower120 at gmail dot com --- No, I compile it with -std=c++1y Here, live example http://ideone.com/KsGrnH (though that is gcc-4.8.1)

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 --- Comment #6 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vondele Date: Fri Aug 22 10:14:50 2014 New Revision: 214311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214311root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Joost VandeVondele

[Bug fortran/61234] Warn for use-stmt without explicit only-list.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61234 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Typo, check the exact spelling of what g++ is complaining about.

[Bug fortran/62226] New: Encode CPP options in lang.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62226 Bug ID: 62226 Summary: Encode CPP options in lang.opt Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 --- Comment #4 from tower120 tower120 at gmail dot com --- Typo indeed. I'm so sorry.

[Bug debug/62225] DW_AT_location for local variable is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62225 --- Comment #2 from Yao Qi qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org --- arm-none-eabi gcc mainline (4.10.0 20140818) and 4.9.2 has this problem too. The test case is compiled with -mthumb flag. 171: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_subprogram) 72 DW_AT_external

[Bug middle-end/61876] Converting __builtin_round + cast into __builtin_lround is not always equivalent in regards to math errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876 --- Comment #12 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Fri Aug 22 10:48:22 2014 New Revision: 214312 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214312root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org Backport from

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/62227] New: Templated move not elided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62227 Bug ID: 62227 Summary: Templated move not elided Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/62228] New: gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62228 Bug ID: 62228 Summary: gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/62228] gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62228 Ankzz ankzzdev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ankzzdev at gmail dot

[Bug c/62228] gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62228 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c++/62229] New: Broken uniform initialization when using std::string ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62229 Bug ID: 62229 Summary: Broken uniform initialization when using std::string ctor Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c/62228] gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62228 --- Comment #2 from Ankzz ankzzdev at gmail dot com --- Why do you think its not a bug? It would be better if you can explain me the reason why level should be replaced with a 0. In the same macro if I replace level with _level, #define

[Bug c/62228] gcc : expected identifier before numeric constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62228 Ankzz ankzzdev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/62226] Encode CPP options in lang.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62226 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ada/62230] New: Legal program rejected, RM 4.3.2(3, 5/3), ancestor_part can not be expression against error message by compiler itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62230 Bug ID: 62230 Summary: Legal program rejected, RM 4.3.2(3, 5/3), ancestor_part can not be expression against error message by compiler itself Product: gcc

[Bug c++/60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #16) Note that we still do not warn for my original testcase. I didn't close the PR ;-) There are patches around that may need more

[Bug fortran/62049] Negative count_rate when calling system_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62049 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/62231] New: Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 Bug ID: 62231 Summary: Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug c++/62232] New: -Wnon-virtual-dtor shouldn't warn on final classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62232 Bug ID: 62232 Summary: -Wnon-virtual-dtor shouldn't warn on final classes Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: canonical types differ for identity types ... when attempting SFINAE with member type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #24 from Dominyk Tiller dominyktiller at gmail dot com --- (In reply to James Clarke from comment #16) Created attachment 33180 [details] Patch For GCC 4.9.1 On Yosemite Requires DP 4 (or above), as I have also removed the fix

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Aug 22 16:47:15 2014 New Revision: 214329 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214329root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Michael Meissner

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 22 16:58:25 2014 New Revision: 214333 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214333root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/62129 * class.c

[Bug c++/62223] error: there are no arguments to ‘static_asssert’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘static_asssert’ must be available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62223 --- Comment #6 from tower120 tower120 at gmail dot com --- Well, classical static_asssert is not a function/variable/etc would be enough for me. Because there are no arguments to 'static_asssert' that depend on a template parameter means that

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Aug 22 17:30:39 2014 New Revision: 214336 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214336root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/62233] New: unnecessary shift instructions to prepare loop counter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62233 Bug ID: 62233 Summary: unnecessary shift instructions to prepare loop counter Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Aug 22 17:53:00 2014 New Revision: 214340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214340root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-22 Michael Meissner

[Bug testsuite/62234] New: warnings/errors from LTO cannot be tested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234 Bug ID: 62234 Summary: warnings/errors from LTO cannot be tested Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/61913] ICE in common_handle_option with -Wodr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #12) So my tree shows it by default. I am at a conference and have to go for talks, I cannot reproduce the above in trunk. Is it that

[Bug fortran/62135] ICE with invalid SELECT CASE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62135 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: steven Date: Fri Aug 22 18:43:50 2014 New Revision: 214351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214351root=gccview=rev Log: fortran/ PR fortran/62135 * resolve.c

[Bug ada/62235] New: Storage_Error in the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 Bug ID: 62235 Summary: Storage_Error in the compiler Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/62135] ICE with invalid SELECT CASE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62135 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 22 18:49:18 2014 New Revision: 214353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214353root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/62129 * class.c

[Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Fri Aug 22 19:12:46 2014 New Revision: 214357 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214357root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/cp/ChangeLog: 2014-08-22 Manuel

[Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/31593] Invariant DO loop variables and subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31593 --- Comment #46 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #45) Anything left to fix in this PR? Unfortunately yes... We still do not take advantage of the fact that the call to a

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/61271] 10 * possible coding error with logical not (!)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Aug 22 19:40:28 2014 New Revision: 214359 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214359root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/61271 * ira-color.c

[Bug c++/62199] ICE with -Wlogical-not-parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62199 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Aug 22 19:44:27 2014 New Revision: 214360 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214360root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/62199 * doc/invoke.texi:

[Bug c++/62199] ICE with -Wlogical-not-parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62199 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/62150] [5.0 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C failed on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62150 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/60550] [OOP] ICE on factory design pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60550 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug target/62233] unnecessary shift instructions to prepare loop counter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62233 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This again is related to bug 37451.

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk --- Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to --disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1 (with c++ working but presumably cilk++

[Bug sanitizer/61955] libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955 --- Comment #3 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk --- Running configure using --disable-libcilkrts (in addition to --disable-libsanitiser) which is not documented results in a useable gcc 4.9.1 (with c++ working but presumably cilk++

[Bug target/61956] problem linking cilk on RHEL4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956 --- Comment #2 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk --- I have tried using a newer binutils (2.24) either installed before attempting to build gcc or in a combined tree build. The combined tree build complains that binutils/bfd is

[Bug middle-end/61913] ICE in common_handle_option with -Wodr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- The testcase still seems to work for me (with and without linker plugin). Without linker plugin collect2 will not execute LTO unless it can resolve symbols. You need to link with

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Markus, can you add attachment? LTO doesn't really know what C++ language flags was used. I guess because the flags are not on by default, prople will use it only if they actually

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2) Markus, can you add attachment? Well, an empty testcase is enough. Or: % echo int main () {} | g++ -Wsuggest-final-types -O2 -x

[Bug fortran/62125] Nested select type not accepted (rejects valid)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125 Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- I suppose VECtors do not like to grow to 0 size. THe following patch fixes the ICE, does it also fixe you real testcases? Index: ipa-devirt.c

[Bug fortran/62125] Nested select type not accepted (rejects valid)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62125 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug ada/62236] New: built-in: error: aggregate value used where an integer was expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62236 Bug ID: 62236 Summary: built-in: error: aggregate value used where an integer was expected Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4) I suppose VECtors do not like to grow to 0 size. THe following patch fixes the ICE, does it also fixe you real testcases? Index: