https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62015
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62304
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm dmalcolm at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 33416
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62304
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Aug 30 14:34:02 2014
New Revision: 214752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214752root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/62304
* gcc/reorg.c
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dvyukov at google dot com
$ g++ -v
gcc version 5.0.0 20140830 (experimental) (GCC)
The program is:
===
#include list
#include pthread.h
#include unistd.h
std::listint::iterator iter, iter2;
void *thread(void *arg)
{
for (int i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You don't protect either the iterators or the list when touching it so I don't
think this is a bug. If they truly independent lists and that was causing
issues, then yes there would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com ---
The additional thread only touches iter, and the main thread does not touch
iter nor invalidate it. So there is nothing to protect here. The program does
not contain data races per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
Bug ID: 62314
Summary: Fix-it Hints
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are other examples here:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#fix-it-hints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62315
Bug ID: 62315
Summary: do not print typename in diagnostic if the original
code does not have it
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62316
Bug ID: 62316
Summary: poor location for missing braces warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|
15 matches
Mail list logo
