https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62588
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62594
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62605
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Bug ID: 62620
Summary: 34 24 324
Product: gcc
Version: 2.95
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: spam
Assignee: unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62623
Bug ID: 62623
Summary: Behavior change in test case with -m32 and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Lily Trish jakabynetifan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61897
--- Comment #2 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Sep 1 07:47:37 2014
New Revision: 214777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214777root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-01 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Sep 1 07:47:37 2014
New Revision: 214777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214777root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-01 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62597
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62628
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62617
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62622
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62629
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 09:18:43 2014
New Revision: 214781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214781root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61903
* expmed.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62307
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The reason for implied -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks for -fsanitize=null,
-fsanitize=nonnull or -fsanitize=returns-nonnull is that the checks themselves
would be optimized away. In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49706
Bug 49706 depends on bug 61271, which changed state.
Bug 61271 Summary: 10 * possible coding error with logical not (!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #4)
For me there is no bug. Standard containers are known to not be thread safe.
No, containers are known to be thread-safe, when used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62174
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #20 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:07:05 2014
New Revision: 214782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214782root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* cgraphunit.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #21 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:12:00 2014
New Revision: 214783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214783root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* cgraphunit.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com ---
The tests for the debug mode don't generally involve threads, so that isn't
likely to help.
Then you can run any heavily multithreaded program that extensively uses stl
and is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #22 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:14:22 2014
New Revision: 214784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214784root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #23 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:16:43 2014
New Revision: 214785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214785root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58102
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62623
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 1 11:15:41 2014
New Revision: 214786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214786root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62025
* sched-deps.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
The patch below fixes it. I'd apply it to trunk and 4.9 without further
testing, as it's obvious, I think. Kaz, if you'd like to run it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 1 11:49:36 2014
New Revision: 214790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214790root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62025
* sched-deps.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why is this marked as a regression btw? From what I can see, already G++ 4.3
behaved this way, and G++ 4.3 was the first release to support gnu_inline
attribute in C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #24)
Created attachment 33407 [details]
Patch for 4.9
Here's a patch for the 4.9 branch. I'm nervous about applying it because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
§14.7.3/12 says:
An explicit specialization of a function template is inline only if it is
declared with the inline specifier or defined as deleted, and independently of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62265
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-*, m68k-*-*, |ia64-*-*, m68k-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Bug ID: 62630
Summary: [5 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/vect-pr43423.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33425
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33425action=edit
vect dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62291
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So what remains is insertion computing whether a value is available on some
predecessor (partial redundancy) or all (full redundancy) which needs AVAIL_OUT
for the predecessors and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33426
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33426action=edit
vect dump
Sure, I meant to but forgot...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Bug ID: 62631
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33427
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33427action=edit
ivopts dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
Created attachment 33426 [details]
vect dump
Sure, I meant to but forgot...
Ok:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33428
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33428action=edit
slp dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33429
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33429action=edit
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
Created attachment 33426 [details]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62294
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
glibc's strstr already uses an asymptotically fast (i.e. O(m+n) instead of
O(mn)) algorithm. See string/str-two-way.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641
--- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 1-Sep-14, at 5:23 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
So fixed?
I left it open because of the following fail on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.dg/delay-slot-2.c scan-assembler printf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #9 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just noticed that this bug has disappeared on mainline. Binary search showed
that this happens with rev. 211007, which checks in this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Possible fix:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index d03f8a4707e5..d8fb35e21237 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Bug ID: 62642
Summary: x86 rdtsc is moved through barrier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ok, looks like Jonathan it pretty sure it is a bug, I am going to take a closer
look at it.
When I said that you would have the same issue with all versions of Standard
lib I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62659
Bug ID: 62659
Summary: [4.9 regression] Regression in template argument
substitution in 4.9+
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62658
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Bug ID: 62661
Summary: digit separator warning in if'ed out code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
This is again visible on trunk now that pr62302 has been fixed (thanks!).
It doesn't seem profitable to ever put D0 in the D5 comdat. It cannot be equal
to D1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62659
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #5 from Chris Clayton chris2553 at googlemail dot com ---
I reverted the code change from r214208 with the following patch:
--- gcc-4.9-20140827-orig/gcc/cp/decl2.c2014-08-20 02:54:40.0
+0100
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Bug ID: 62662
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Sep 1 22:25:09 2014
New Revision: 214804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214804root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/62312
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Sep 1 22:31:55 2014
New Revision: 214805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214805root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2014-09-01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
Bug ID: 62663
Summary: m68k / coldfire : compiling with -msep-data breaks the
code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It might be possible to solve using the base-from-member idiom so that
_M_current is set before the iterator is added to the collection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
--- Comment #1 from angelo angelo70 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33431
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33431action=edit
wrong object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Bug ID: 62664
Summary: MMX set intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |target
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62665
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Comment #2 from g.peterhoff.home at talkplus dot de ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
I think you forgot to clear the MMX state. MMX and FP share the same
register set and need to be cleared before going from MMX to FP.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Comment #3 from g.peterhoff.home at talkplus dot de ---
Sorry, I mean
typedef union
{
__m64 m;
__m128i s;
int32_t e [4];
ZZ};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62667
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62669
Bug ID: 62669
Summary: high quality! Watch Teen Wolf Season 4 Episode 11
Online and free
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62669
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62668
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62670
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62671
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62672
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62675
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62676
Bug ID: 62676
Summary: stream!!! Watch America's Next Top Model Season 21
Episode 3 Online Free
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62678
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62677
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
