https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
Bug ID: 63326
Summary: pragma GCC causes wrong code generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To support the standards definition of p1 - p2 we'd need a POINTER_DIFF_EXPR
that also embeds the exact division by the array element size.
Btw, while C and C++ share
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327
Bug ID: 63327
Summary: Poor caret location in error mesage
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63316
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is BITS_PER_WORD (too small for Linux actually, glibc
guarantees 2 * BITS_PER_WORD).
So, this IMNSHO is a libsanitizer bug, in that it doesn't provide the Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
--- Comment #5 from marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Sep 22 09:39:20 2014
New Revision: 215451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215451root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/63270 - new test
* g++.dg/lto/pr63270_0.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298
Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328
Bug ID: 63328
Summary: c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with
-fcompare-debug
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63295
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63288
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63316
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |5.0
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is probably ifcombine at work and the target splitting the combined
condition back, but the other way around.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 22 10:32:09 2014
New Revision: 215454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215454root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/63328
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 22 10:34:16 2014
New Revision: 215455
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215455root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/63328
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon Sep 22 11:08:03 2014
New Revision: 215458
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215458root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/63312
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 22 11:27:54 2014
New Revision: 215459
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215459root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63323
* ubsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
Bug ID: 63329
Summary: std::bind does not define argument_type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330
Bug ID: 63330
Summary: vector shuffle resembling vector shift not expanded
optimally
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(this is aimed at removing VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR and thus no longer using vec_shr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sanchez thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com ---
BTW, I forgot to add that the compiler is invoked with this command:
g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp
Also, funny thing, with clang, it is the first one that do not compile :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
In our case the issue is slightly different, the problem is in
cp_parser_initializer_list, here:
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
cp_lexer_consume_token
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
Bug ID: 63331
Summary: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 22 13:34:09 2014
New Revision: 215463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215463root=gccview=rev
Log:
Make streams movable and swappable.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 22 13:34:09 2014
New Revision: 215463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215463root=gccview=rev
Log:
Make streams movable and swappable.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
Bug ID: 63332
Summary: problem with VERIFY in
ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc
execution test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #1 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
BTW, I'm curious if the problem is related to float rounding in I/O, as in
FAIL: ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators/values.cc execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Bug 54316 depends on bug 53626, which changed state.
Bug 53626 Summary: [C++11] move assignment for ifstream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sanchez thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com ---
While it is not really intuitive I understand.
Thanks for your time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #11 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
Richard Biener: if the middle end tells us that one pointer is greater or equal
than the other pointer, we could do unsigned subtraction and shift.
But if we don't know which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*|x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de ---
With today's binutils snapshot, there's a gas_assert in front of it, which
silences this bogus warning. That needs to be reverted to test GCC wrt. this
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33532
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33532action=edit
gcc5-pr63331.patch
Untested patch to fix (or work around) all but the last 2 FAILs.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: lto, 1to1 segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63334
Bug ID: 63334
Summary: -m16 should turn off MMX, SSE, AVX as well as
VEX-encoded scalar instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
Bug ID: 63335
Summary: GCC:failures for vector double on calls to bif
vec_[all|any]_[nge|nle]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-
-disable-werror --without-cloog --without-isl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140922 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-std=c99' '-c' '-fcilkplus' '-v' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x
86-64' '-pthread'
/usr/local/gcc5.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-cygwin/5.0.0/cc1.exe
-fpreprocesse
d s422.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337
Bug ID: 63337
Summary: Hexadecimal exponent: improvements to error message
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63334
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-m16 should turn off MMX, |-m16 should turn off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61465
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 22 18:47:16 2014
New Revision: 215476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215476root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61465
* call.c (convert_like_real)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 22 19:21:20 2014
New Revision: 215477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215477root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-09-22 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014
New Revision: 215478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63320
PR c++/60463
PR c++/60755
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60463
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014
New Revision: 215478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63320
PR c++/60463
PR c++/60755
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60755
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014
New Revision: 215478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63320
PR c++/60463
PR c++/60755
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just to be clear, it is fixed in GCC 5 trunk sources. I'll build it with the
GCC 4.9 branch as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 22 19:48:54 2014
New Revision: 215483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215483root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-09-22 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #8 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Update on my previous work:
1) My previous update referred to a build that was done with the patches that
were submitted to gcc and patches that Dominik provided me for libffi. I found
that if I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The gamess benchmark also runs fine with the options when built with subversion
215404 on the gcc-4_9-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Tue Sep 23 00:48:46 2014
New Revision: 215491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215491root=gccview=rev
Log:
Remove LIBGCC2_LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
Bug ID: 63338
Summary: Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a
large amount of time
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
--- Comment #1 from Steven Stewart-Gallus sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot
bc.ca ---
Created attachment 33535
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33535action=edit
Preprocessed source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61606
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
90 matches
Mail list logo