[Bug target/63815] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) Created attachment 33942 [details] A patch Please also add a testcase that will exercise this functionality.

[Bug target/63815] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8) (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) Created attachment 33942 [details] A patch Please also add a testcase that will exercise this

[Bug preprocessor/63831] New: [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfauls with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 Bug ID: 63831 Summary: [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfauls with -MM Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/58692] aarch64 arm_neon.h functions are not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58692 --- Comment #2 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed fix r217405 and r217406. r217406 | belagod | 2014-11-12 08:46:05 + (Wed, 12 Nov 2014) | 14

[Bug target/58692] aarch64 arm_neon.h functions are not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58692 Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58972] Lambda can't access private members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972 Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58972] Lambda can't access private members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972 --- Comment #9 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #8) Does not ICE anymore, and the original bug has been resolved (Daniel's local class example is still rejected). I don't

[Bug middle-end/63819] [5 Regression]: Cannot build compiler with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats (error: default argument given for parameter 5 of ‘void* ggc_internal_cleared_alloc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63819 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/63820] [5.0 regression] c++ ICE since libcpp change r217202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63820 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/63823] [5.0 Regression] MIPS will not build due to LRA ICE with 64 bit ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63823 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug bootstrap/63821] [5 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with r217349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/63761] [5 Regression] error: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63761 --- Comment #5 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Wed Nov 12 09:50:20 2014 New Revision: 217409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217409root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-11-12 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've also seen parallel bootstrap break once last week. Of course hard to track...

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target

[Bug middle-end/63819] [5 Regression]: Cannot build compiler with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats (error: default argument given for parameter 5 of ‘void* ggc_internal_cleared_alloc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63819 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 12 10:12:47 2014 New Revision: 217410 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217410root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-11-12 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug bootstrap/63821] [5 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with r217349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 12 10:13:48 2014 New Revision: 217411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217411root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-11-12 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug middle-end/63819] [5 Regression]: Cannot build compiler with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats (error: default argument given for parameter 5 of ‘void* ggc_internal_cleared_alloc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63819 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/63821] [5 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with r217349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/63820] [5.0 regression] c++ ICE since libcpp change r217202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63820 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/63817] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg tree-cfg.c:5039 (arm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63817 --- Comment #4 from Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de --- You can see this bug live in action for about every target when building a native toolchain on gcc112, which is done in preparation for a cross-build with config_list.mk by the build

[Bug c++/33911] attribute deprecated vs. templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Wed Nov 12 10:32:17 2014 New Revision: 217412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217412root=gccview=rev Log: Add -Wno-deprecated to dg-options. PR

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- ... unless the or of a template type argument part applies (but clang accepts both the original testcase and my Comment #1?!?)

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- In case a correct reduced reproducer would be: struct MyIter { int operator*(); }; templatetypename Iterator void foo(Iterator begin) { auto x = [](const

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2) I'm looking into this, and I don't see how we can accept this kind of code given 8.3.2: Cv-qualified references are

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Ah, thanks, that explains everything!

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- I haven't tried to reproduce this yet, but I don't see how that patch could lead to this. What is actually the error that triggers that failure in make?

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 12 12:28:06 2014 New Revision: 217415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217415root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/59708 * builtin-attrs.def

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #5 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- This is extremely reproducible at r217383 on darwin and no other breakage in the parallel make has been seen this week prior to this commit. The accumulated error messages in the failing

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4) I haven't tried to reproduce this yet, but I don't see how that patch could lead to this. What is actually the error that triggers that

[Bug ipa/63814] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 on darwin14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Dominique, if you could pinpoint exactly the revision causing this, it would be great. Most of us do not have access to a darwin machine. Thanks.

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to howarth from comment #5) It looks like the failure occurs when the java classes are being compiled. Can we revert r217383 until the flaw in its handling of the

[Bug testsuite/63830] c-c++-common/asan/strlen-overflow-1.c fails on x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63830 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 12 12:54:00 2014 New Revision: 217417 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217417root=gccview=rev Log: Avoid tail call in

[Bug testsuite/63830] c-c++-common/asan/strlen-overflow-1.c fails on x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63830 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7) (In reply to howarth from comment #5) It looks like the failure occurs when the java classes are being compiled. Can we revert r217383

[Bug ipa/63814] g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 on darwin14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Dominique, if you could pinpoint exactly the revision causing this, it would be great. Most of us do not have access to a darwin machine. Thanks. It was what I tried to

[Bug fortran/59298] ICE when initialising PARAMETER array of derived-type (containing an array) using array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59298 --- Comment #5 from Adam Hirst adam at aphirst dot karoo.co.uk --- I decided to check on the status of this bug in 4.9.2, as it's been a little while, and the segmentation fault still occurs. Interestingly, the test case that Janus posted on

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Now I see why I accidentally cc'd Manu. This breakage occurred in the commit just prior to the jit commit which, as a fortune commit, indeed doesn't make much sense.

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #10 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to howarth from comment #9) Now I see why I accidentally cc'd Manu. This breakage occurred in the commit just prior to the jit commit which, as a fortune commit, indeed doesn't make

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #10) (In reply to howarth from comment #9) Now I see why I accidentally cc'd Manu. This breakage occurred in the commit just prior to the jit commit

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9) (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8) (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) Created attachment 33942 [details] A patch Please

[Bug middle-end/63761] [5 Regression] error: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63761 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libgcc/63832] New: [5.0 Regression] crtstuff.c:400:19: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832 Bug ID: 63832 Summary: [5.0 Regression] crtstuff.c:400:19: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/63833] New: REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833 Bug ID: 63833 Summary: REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrong for x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/52961] Make -Wempty-body less noisy and enable it with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52961 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Missing warning on empty if |Make

[Bug c/49053] Please add an option to catch empty statements (-Wempty-statement ?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49053 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/58972] Lambda can't access private members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972 Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/62184] [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to 'while' loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to howarth from comment #11) I am rerunning my tests. I can definitely say the bootstrap is broken post-r217814 in the libjava parallel make. Retesting if r217813 is

[Bug libgcc/63832] [5.0 Regression] crtstuff.c:400:19: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 --- Comment #13 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #12) (In reply to howarth from comment #11) If you are using --enable-checking=release, perhaps you are seeing:

[Bug c++/60420] [DR 1510] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/63834] New: [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute(xxxx) test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63834 Bug ID: 63834 Summary: [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute() test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12). Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/63834] [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute(xxxx) test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63834 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug preprocessor/63834] [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute(xxxx) test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63834 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/63828] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-47.C fails for x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63828 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 33948 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33948action=edit A patch Tested on Linux/32.

[Bug tree-optimization/63835] New: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63835 Bug ID: 63835 Summary: ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/63836] [5 Regression] r217349 caused segfault building 178.galgel from cpu2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63836 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/63836] New: [5 Regression] r217349 caused segfault building 178.galgel from cpu2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63836 Bug ID: 63836 Summary: [5 Regression] r217349 caused segfault building 178.galgel from cpu2000 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/63837] New: [5 Regression] r217391 causes kernel build errors with GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837 Bug ID: 63837 Summary: [5 Regression] r217391 causes kernel build errors with GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #11 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #9) Author: yroux Date: Mon Oct 6 12:25:14 2014 New Revision: 215929 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215929root=gccview=rev Log: /libstdc++-v3/

[Bug bootstrap/63821] [5 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with r217349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot

[Bug tree-optimization/63835] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63835 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/63836] [5 Regression] r217349 caused segfault building 178.galgel from cpu2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63836 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- A simple testcase: [hjl@gnu-mic-2 delta-fortran]$ cat foo.f90 SUBROUTINE DTRSM ( NN, NB) DO 50 J = NN, 1, -NB 50CONTINUE end [hjl@gnu-mic-2 delta-fortran]$

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #12 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Thomas, Any chance you could backport for 4.8 Yvan? Do you want me to do it? Or are the release manager against a 4.8 backport? Do you mean Linaro 4.8 branch ? if it is the case

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33949 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33949action=edit Quick patch. I'm not on a box I can easily build and test. Here is a quick one leaving aside the

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #4 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can someone quick try that?

[Bug ipa/63838] New: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-pure-const miscomputes can_throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63838 Bug ID: 63838 Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-pure-const miscomputes can_throw Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug bootstrap/63821] [5 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with r217349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug tree-optimization/63836] [5 Regression] r217349 caused segfault building 178.galgel from cpu2000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63836 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63838] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-pure-const miscomputes can_throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug ipa/63838] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-pure-const miscomputes can_throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63838 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33950 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33950action=edit gcc5-pr63838.patch Untested fix. For 4.9/4.8, perhaps just the

[Bug preprocessor/63834] [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute(xxxx) test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63834 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- I posted a patch on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 if here anyone wants to test it before I can. I'm away from my main machine ATM.

[Bug tree-optimization/63835] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63835 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 12 18:56:50 2014 New Revision: 217441 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217441root=gccview=rev Log: Add a testcase for PR tree-optimization/63835

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to emsr from comment #4) Can someone quick try that? Yes. It doesn't work. trippels@gcc2-power8 test % /home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -I ./ -MM

[Bug sanitizer/63839] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in simplify_builtin_call, at tree-ssa-forwprop.c:1441 with -fsanitize=unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63839 Bug ID: 63839 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in simplify_builtin_call, at tree-ssa-forwprop.c:1441 with -fsanitize=unreachable Product: gcc

[Bug preprocessor/63834] [5 Regression] unrecognised __has_attribute(xxxx) test causes segv (prevents bootstrap on darwin12).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63834 --- Comment #4 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- __has_include, as opposed to __has_cpp_include may predate my patch. I know clang has it. That might explain it showing up in darwin sys headers. I might have to back off of __has_attribute at

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #6 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33952 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33952action=edit Just remove the define of the __has_attribute macro entirely. Just remove the define of the

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to emsr from comment #6) Created attachment 33952 [details] Just remove the define of the __has_attribute macro entirely. Just remove the define of the

[Bug bootstrap/63740] [4.9 Regression] GCC 4.9.2 bootstrap fails on ARM, haifa-sched.c:6507:1: internal compiler error: in lra_create

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740 --- Comment #8 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi --- ICE backtrace seems to be same as in Bug 61430. The fix for that has not been backported to 4.9 branch. I tested it and it seems to fix the issue at hand. The fix:

[Bug preprocessor/63831] [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831 --- Comment #8 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thank you. I'll formalize this in a bit.

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- With early VRP (but also without) the inliner seems to now suffer from extreme roundoff errors at badness. With VRP the first uninlined function still has badness 0: Considering

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) But I am having a hard time to add it to gcc testsuite. IMO, the following should be sufficient: --cut here-- Index: g++.dg/other/pr63815.C

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- if there's a guard for mcmodel=large support, that should be added [since we have not had time to implement mcmodel=large for Darwin, I would expect the test to fail there anyway]

[Bug bootstrap/63827] parallel make in libjava broken at r217383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12) if there's a guard for mcmodel=large support, that should be added [since we have not had time to implement mcmodel=large for Darwin, I

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11) Currently, this test crashes, and when fixed, there is little chance that the (allocatable) PIC register from main equals r11 in the thunk.

[Bug c++/60420] [DR 1510] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 12 20:43:09 2014 New Revision: 217444 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217444root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-11-12 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/60420] [DR 1510] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/63840] New: std::function copy constructor deletes an uninitialized pointer if new fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840 Bug ID: 63840 Summary: std::function copy constructor deletes an uninitialized pointer if new fails Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/63815] [5 Regression] g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails with -mcmodel=large -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815 --- Comment #15 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 12 21:16:14 2014 New Revision: 217445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217445root=gccview=rev Log: Initialize PIC register for large PIC model

[Bug tree-optimization/63841] New: Incorrect strlen optimization after complete unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841 Bug ID: 63841 Summary: Incorrect strlen optimization after complete unroll Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/63841] Incorrect strlen optimization after complete unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841 --- Comment #1 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com --- Google ref b/18344370

[Bug target/63610] Fixing the libtool bug for Yosemite (darwin14)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/63610] Fixing the libtool bug for Yosemite (darwin14)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610 --- Comment #14 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #13) Fixed on trunk. I don't see the need to back port to 4.9, since I don't see many test suite failures on that branch. If you have

[Bug ipa/63838] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ipa-pure-const miscomputes can_throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63838 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 12 23:09:15 2014 New Revision: 217449 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217449root=gccview=rev Log: PR ipa/63838 * ipa-pure-const.c

[Bug sanitizer/63839] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in simplify_builtin_call, at tree-ssa-forwprop.c:1441 with -fsanitize=unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63839 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

  1   2   >