https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
With both patches applied bootstrap is OK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #20)
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #19)
I assume this didn't make it into a 4.8 release?
That the bug didn't make it,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #6)
For attached -g0 problem reproducer:
gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -g -o 1.o
gcc pr63995-2.c -c -O2 -mmpx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The padding of struct on the same target should not change randomly though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
It was caused by r217655.
The problem was introduced earlier when function_code field in
tree_function_decl was extended to 12 bits. LTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Bug ID: 64081
Summary: [5 Regression] r217827 prevents RTL loop unroll
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
4.9 rejects this. This is ice-on-invalid, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64074
--- Comment #2 from Florian Miedniak florian.miedniak at web dot de ---
Thanks for the hint! I had I try with GCC 4.7.3 again:
powerpc-elf-eabi-gcc.exe -mcpu=8548 -c test.c -o test.o -mdouble-float
-mfloat-gprs=double -save-temps -v -mabi=spe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto |
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 09:43:39 2014
New Revision: 218074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218074root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64074
--- Comment #3 from Florian Miedniak florian.miedniak at web dot de ---
(In reply to Florian Miedniak from comment #2)
Thanks for the hint! I had I try with GCC 4.7.3 again:
powerpc-elf-eabi-gcc.exe -mcpu=8548 -c test.c -o test.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64080
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57610
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64076
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, the change allows DOM to CSE pos = 0 in
bb 2:
pos = 0;
dir = 1;
_45 = (long unsigned int) argc_9(D);
if (_45 != 0)
goto bb 3;
else
goto bb 21;
bb 3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 regression] [AArch64] |[5.0 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63663
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
Bug ID: 64082
Summary: virtual register elimination doing bad for local array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38757
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mark
Date: Wed Nov 26 11:05:20 2014
New Revision: 218077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218077root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/38757 continued. Handle C11, C++11 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's the vectorizer via data-ref analysis that creates overlapping life-ranges
here. I have a trivial fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38757
Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62238
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63605
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 11:42:44 2014
New Revision: 218078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218078root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 11:42:44 2014
New Revision: 218078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218078root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 11:42:44 2014
New Revision: 218078
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218078root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63663
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
I also saw
FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
at random on Linux/ia32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Bug ID: 64083
Summary: ICE compiling Linux Kernel drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_net.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64079
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63605
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414
Bug 50414 depends on bug 63379, which changed state.
Bug 63379 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Incorrect vectorization when enabling SSE
and O3, initialises loop with wrong value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63605
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:22:27 2014
New Revision: 218081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218081root=gccview=rev
Log:
XFAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh, no. It's actually a genuine bug.
__attribute__((optimize(O3))) enables -fstrict-aliasing, so if the
rest of the TU is compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing it depends on
prue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code in comment 23 compiled OK at r215990 (I couldn't test with r216304 to
confirm t his is definitely the same issue because that failed to bootstrap on
powerpc for a different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #5 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:53:38 2014
New Revision: 218083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218083root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/64075
* tree-streamer-in.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63788
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Nov 26 14:05:21 2014
New Revision: 218084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218084root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63788
* asan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63788
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems I have an (untested) fix in my dev tree:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #10 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Nov 26 14:37:07 2014
New Revision: 218085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218085root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/63995
* tree-chkp-opt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Partition maps differ
216303:
Partition 0 (_1 - 1 101 200 252 267 316 348 )
Partition 16 (l1_lsm.7_159 - 106 159 238 253 )
and for 216304:
Partition 3 (l1_lsm.7_58 - 58
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
TARGET_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds TARGET_CXXFLAGS=-O2
-g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
--- Comment #10 from Gereon Kremer gereon.kremer at cs dot rwth-aachen.de ---
Any news?
The problem persists for the following versions:
- 4.8.3, error at line 17225
- 4.9.1, error at line 18149
- 4.9.2, error at line 18149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 15:16:24 2014
New Revision: 218088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218088root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 15:17:31 2014
New Revision: 218089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218089root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Bug ID: 64084
Summary: [5 Regression] match-and-simplify prefers complex
matches
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With Martin's fibheap long-sreal change some of anomalies went away. -ficf is
no longer an issue, but mainline still produces slower binary than 4.9 and
-fwhole-program hurts code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
Any reason why non-C-family languages cannot use MPX?
Richard.
There is no fundamental restriction. If someone wants to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 26 16:06:53 2014
New Revision: 218090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218090root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #23 from Renlin Li renlin.li at arm dot com ---
I am using x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc toolchain.
Reproduce the issue in 4.9 branch with -O2 -fPIC -mtune=native options.
With 4.9.2 release, I reproduced the problem with -O2 -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a piece of code in resolve_variable (resolve.c, line 4911) that looks
like it is related to this problem:
if (sym-attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE
(!sym-attr.function
||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59244
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Bug ID: 64085
Summary: ICE on C++14 lambda by-reference capture with an
initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Yegorushkin maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot com ---
It compiles fine if I replace the line in question with:
return [captive = static_castT(arg)](auto a) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com ---
The patch works, thanks! But the committed test is incorrect, because the
original, unpatched compiler, does not fail on it. It failed on functions
__mulsc3, __muldc3,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53837
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53910
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Fabien?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60709
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58174
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry Gorbachev from comment #6)
The patch works, thanks! But the committed test is incorrect, because the
original, unpatched compiler, does not fail on it. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Nov 26 18:10:29 2014
New Revision: 218091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218091root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Bernd Edlinger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Bernd Edlinger edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Richard, I still get 2.7 per iteration for GCC 4.9.
For mainline and inline limits bumped ad extermum I can not get better than 3.3
(and it is what I get with -O3 -Ofast too). I am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Bug ID: 64086
Summary: [5 Regression] building patched libstdc++ on
powerpc64-linux-gnu gets ICE in
expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7716
Product: gcc
Version:
/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141126 (experimental) [trunk revision 218072] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -m64 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
At some point you start measuring processor characteristics.
On my old AMD box (Phenom II) gcc-5 now is the fastest:
-Ofast: 2.9
-O3 : 3.6
PGO/-Ofast: 2.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63757
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 26 20:11:16 2014
New Revision: 218098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218098root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-26 Paolo Carlini
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo