https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60585
--- Comment #1 from Andris Pavenis andris.pavenis at iki dot fi ---
Reproduced also with gcc-5.0 20141123 snapshot on Linux x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 28 08:57:43 2014
New Revision: 218141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218141root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790
Bug 63790 depends on bug 64084, which changed state.
Bug 64084 Summary: [5 Regression] match-and-simplify prefers complex matches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64092
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Nov 28 09:06:48 2014
New Revision: 218142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218142root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/63862
c-family/
* c-ubsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790
Bug 63790 depends on bug 63862, which changed state.
Bug 63862 Summary: C frontend converts shift-count to int while standard wants
integer promotions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62128
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64098
Bug ID: 64098
Summary: ICE isl_ctx.c:172: isl_ctx freed, but some objects
still referenced
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #3 from leimaohui leimaohui at cn dot fujitsu.com ---
Thanks for joseph's reply.
But I found the reason is the founction pthread_exit(0) can't execut
normally。
Because it will lead a SIGABRT signal and aborted .
I wrote a test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63697
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Bug ID: 64099
Summary: [5 Regression] ~15% runtime increase for fatigue.f90.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100
Bug ID: 64100
Summary: A static assert using the the current class in a
noexcept test leads to a segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #24 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:01:27 2014
New Revision: 218143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218143root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add testcase for PR63661.
2014-11-28 Renlin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ix86_function_arg_advance calls chkp_type_bounds_count which dies on an array
type with variable bounds so the immediate workaround is:
Index: tree-chkp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
rylai palpatin91 at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #25 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:18:47 2014
New Revision: 218144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218144root=gccview=rev
Log:
Use native tune. nehalem is not able to triggle the issue in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #26)
I proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02832.html
I have this patch in my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
--- Comment #3 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at ---
I was probably to enthusiastic, the problem is still there, even in GCC 4.9.2.
In order to reproduce the bug, you either have to use a root file system which
was also built with GCC 4.8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64101
Bug ID: 64101
Summary: GCC considers that the erf math function does not set
errno
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I don't see this on any of our testers. What CPU do you have and what default
-march gets used for you? (thus please show -v output)
My CPU is a 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Additional (related) issue:
The following program
module precision_module
implicit none
integer, parameter ::
sp = selected_real_kind( 6, 37)
integer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
I don't see this on any of our testers. What CPU do you have and what
default
-march gets used for you? (thus please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Ugh - -Ofast is an alias for -O3 -ffast-math. Ah, no - it also enables
--param allow-store-data-races=1 ...
-Ofast
Disregard strict standards compliance. -Ofast enables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64101
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63659
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:32:57 2014
New Revision: 218150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218150root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-10-31 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:34:13 2014
New Revision: 218151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218151root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-19 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:35:28 2014
New Revision: 218152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218152root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-19 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63938
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:36:36 2014
New Revision: 218153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218153root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-24 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:37:13 2014
New Revision: 218154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218154root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-25 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 13:38:16 2014
New Revision: 218155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218155root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-27 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64102
Bug ID: 64102
Summary: ARM bootstrap fails with segfault with -mapcs in
BOOT_CFLAGS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103
Bug ID: 64103
Summary: conflicting definitions in parallel/algo.h and
algorithmfwd.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64102
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
attaching gdb for a better back trace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xbeffe4fc in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xbeffe4fc in ?? ()
#1 0x001824b8 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
My guess is that -fstack-arrays makes the difference.
Confirmed:
[Book15] lin/test% gfc -Ofast -fwhole-program fatigue.f90 -fno-stack-arrays
[Book15] lin/test% time a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64102
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My hunch is that this is a miscompile of something earlier in the process
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64104
Bug ID: 64104
Summary: [F2003][IEEE] Allow IEEE functions in specification
expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37630
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64104
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64105
Bug ID: 64105
Summary: ICE: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1326
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64106
Bug ID: 64106
Summary: [5 Regression][C++14] internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_store_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Nov 28 15:27:55 2014
New Revision: 218161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218161root=gccview=rev
Log:
Pass unpromoted argument to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.2 |4.8.4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63941
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
My patch is responsible for ICE - I did not assume that before if-convert phase
cfg may contain redundant degenerative conditional branches:
bb 4:
...
_14 = d[pretmp_51];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
TREE_INT_CST_LOW (maxval) assumes integer constant anyway. Therefore we may
use simpler check. It fixes gnat.dg/derived_aggregate.adb.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-chkp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64087
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 28 15:39:52 2014
New Revision: 218162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218162root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-28 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
Bug ID: 64107
Summary: [F95] Pure function as array size
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The second runtime increase (with '-Ofast', the only one with '-O3
-ffast-math') is due to r217827
[Book15] lin/test% /opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-217825p1/bin/gfortran -Ofast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64087
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Nov 28 16:25:33 2014
New Revision: 218164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218164root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64093
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64055
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
TREE_INT_CST_LOW (maxval) assumes integer constant anyway. Therefore we may
use simpler check. It fixes gnat.dg/derived_aggregate.adb.
FWIW fine with me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61200
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 17:03:01 2014
New Revision: 218165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218165root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-10-03 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63659
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 17:03:55 2014
New Revision: 218166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218166root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-10-31 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63938
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 17:04:51 2014
New Revision: 218167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218167root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-24 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 17:05:34 2014
New Revision: 218168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218168root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-25 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 28 17:06:23 2014
New Revision: 218169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218169root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-11-27 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63659
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63938
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61200
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com ---
(In reply to manfred.rudigier from comment #3)
In order to reproduce the bug, you either have to use a root file
system which was also built with GCC 4.8.3 or 4.9.2, or you just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
In such a case you need to debug the system as a whole until you have
isolated the bug to one component and can then report it to that component
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64061
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 28 19:33:35 2014
New Revision: 218171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218171root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-28 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The first runtime increase (with '-Ofast') is due to r216728:
[Book15] lin/test% /opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-216727p2/bin/gfortran -Ofast
-fwhole-program fatigue.f90
[Book15] lin/test%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63199
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64108
Bug ID: 64108
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in decide_alg() with
-mmemset-strategy=libcall:-1:align
-minline-all-stringops
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #26 from Volker Braun vbraun.name at gmail dot com ---
I can confirm that r217783 fixes the original issue on in the GSL testsuite on
OSX Yosemite, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60372
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41698
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Nov 29 01:56:06 2014
New Revision: 218179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218179root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix off-by-one bug in utf16 conversion (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41698
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #85 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34135
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34135action=edit
patch to add -mlra option
I'd like to apply the patch to add a transitional option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
Bug ID: 64110
Summary: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is
achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
Bug ID: 64111
Summary: [5.0 regression] ICE: conversion of register to a
different size
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
Created attachment 34136
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34136action=edit
Preprocessed output for the source file with the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
Created attachment 34138
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34138action=edit
Preprocessed sources for the build error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
Created attachment 34137
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34137action=edit
Preprocessed output for the precompilation header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64112
Bug ID: 64112
Summary: Optimized away string literal leads to a core dump
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64112
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
creduce reduced to the following testcase:
class A {
public:
short m_fn1() { return ucs; }
short ucs;
};
class C {
public:
int m_fn2();
} a;
A *b;
C c;
void fn1(A p1) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
This reduced testcase starts (apparently) with an uninitialised int i, but the
same problem happens if you initialise to 0 (for (int i = 0; i d; ++i))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113
Bug ID: 64113
Summary: Gcc on Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!282 was found
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
95 matches
Mail list logo
