https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151
--- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Working on a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64249
Bug ID: 64249
Summary: Missing warning for if (A) else if (A)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:20:43 2014
New Revision: 218560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218560root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:24:22 2014
New Revision: 218561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218561root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:29:44 2014
New Revision: 218562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218562root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #43 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:31:32 2014
New Revision: 218563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218563root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53513
* doc/extend.texi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64250
Bug ID: 64250
Summary: Missing warning for if (AA AA) / same expression
multiple times used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64250
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63413
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63594
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 10 09:00:50 2014
New Revision: 218565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218565root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/63594
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Warn for P P and P || P |Warn for P P and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 10 09:29:05 2014
New Revision: 218566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218566root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #61 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #60)
Ok, so I have a patch that teaches LIM to move the division by using the
value-range information we now store.
Which can't be done
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, matt at gwalski dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
Bug ID: 64246
Summary: [5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
Bug ID: 64251
Summary: [5 Regression] Chromium build error only with
--enable-checking=yes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64252
Bug ID: 64252
Summary: [5 Regression] expand_vec_perm_pblendv caused
miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For example:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat foo.ii
class DictionaryValue {};
template typename T void CreateValue(T) {
DictionaryValue(0);
CreateValue(0);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #47 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #44)
(In reply to Sandra Loosemore from comment #43)
I'm seeing the same errors as in Comment 8 (complaints about arrays with
negative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63950
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160
--- Comment #5 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com ---
Thanks, Ulrich: that's a better explanation of what makes me uncomfortable with
that part of the machine description.
We have a complex split pattern that's the sole user of an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:22:34 2014
New Revision: 218571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218571root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64100
* typeck.c (lookup_destructor):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64249
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:26:47 2014
New Revision: 218572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218572root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64100
* g++.dg/template/pr64100.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:29:22 2014
New Revision: 218573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218573root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64127
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:32:00 2014
New Revision: 218574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218574root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64127
* g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
Alexander Vogt a.vogt at fulguritus dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.vogt at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #62 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34238
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34238action=edit
frontend patch
So the issue is that the division is executed conditionally because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #63 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34239
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34239action=edit
LIM patch
This is a patch to loop invariant motion I was playing with to use range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64252
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64248
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Are you sure you are not using uninitialized memory? try using the various
-fsanitize flags (not sure if uninit memory use is in =address or =undefined).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Are you sure you are not using uninitialized memory? try using the various
-fsanitize flags (not sure if uninit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
Bug 57067 depends on bug 56982, which changed state.
Bug 56982 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bad optimization with setjmp()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57481
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug 5 depends on bug 57511, which changed state.
Bug 57511 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58048
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58170
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58251
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58375
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58957
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59004
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59248
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59374
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60617
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60769
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62284
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63584
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64199
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64225
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64239
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62021
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64239
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
match_results::swap() fails to handle _M_in_iterator as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Bug ID: 64253
Summary: [5 Regression] IPA inline analysis processes a code
transform operation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue is probably latent on branches (where nobody cares though).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 10 14:07:47 2014
New Revision: 218578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218578root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63909
* gimple-iterator.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
sorry, can't say anymore. Debian dropped ia64, and I don't have access anymore
to any hardware.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo