https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64381
Bug ID: 64381
Summary: ICE with initialization of procedure pointer in type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64005
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Ian explained in an offline communication:
It's more likely that with -O2 some dead pointers appears in a stack
frame, and cause the garbage collector to think that the values are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64173
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
*** Bug 64381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64381
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Dec 23 09:30:20 2014
New Revision: 219042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219042root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR ipa/63851 and ipa/63852.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Dec 23 09:30:20 2014
New Revision: 219042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219042root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR ipa/63851 and ipa/63852.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
I can reproduce the wrong-code with gcc-4.9.2 on armv7l-linux-gnueabi. Appears
to need both -foptimize-sibling-calls and -mapcs-frame to trigger.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
--- Comment #13 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at ---
(In reply to Dan Wilder from comment #12)
I have a backport of the patches referenced in comment 4, which I applied to
the gcc-4.8.3 we are using for e500v2. If anybody would care to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 23 10:51:32 2014
New Revision: 219043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219043root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64382
Bug ID: 64382
Summary: ICE due to use of `this` inside a lambda that captures
everything by ref inside a member function of a class
template
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Bug ID: 64383
Summary: missed warning for unused variable.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384
Bug ID: 64384
Summary: mingw-w64: stdcall function returning an aggregate is
incompatible with MS ABI
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384
Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
--- Comment #7 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6)
Even that is probably too much right now. :) I do hope to be able to make some
bigger contributions in the future (in code too),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385
Bug ID: 64385
Summary: odd behaviour of std::is_move_constructible
std::ostringstream
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64384
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35423
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56408
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379
--- Comment #7 from Donn Seeley donn.seeley at windriver dot com ---
Re -mapcs-frame: Yes, the failure is due to code in
arm_expand_epilogue_apcs_frame() that explicitly requires / stomps on IP in
order to restore VFP/NEON registers. Sorry, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386
Bug ID: 64386
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mavx512bw
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25508
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
The point isn't documenting the rationale for particular choices, it's
documenting (in fragments.texi) the general semantics, including for the
A=B and A=!B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387
Bug ID: 64387
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable
insn) with -ffloat-store -mavx512er
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64388
Bug ID: 64388
Summary: [5 Regression] r219037 caused FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64388
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
Bug ID: 64389
Summary: duplicate symbols in libstdc++.6.dylib on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
Host||x86_64-apple-darwin14
Build||x86_64-apple-darwin14
--- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Configured as...
../gcc-5-20141223/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0
--mandir=/sw/share
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390
Bug ID: 64390
Summary: -shared does not resolve symbols from lto generated
archives
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391
Bug ID: 64391
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in get_attrs_for (trans-mem.c:179) with
-fgnu-tm and #pragma GCC ivdep
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390
--- Comment #1 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 23 19:06:23 2014
New Revision: 219047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219047root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64392
Bug ID: 64392
Summary: ICE: in pdr_stride_in_loop, at
graphite-interchange.c:261 (isl_val_gmp.c:47:
expecting rational value) with -floop-interchange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393
Bug ID: 64393
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mavx512vbmi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64391
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz ---
Many gfortran testcases fail with the same backtrace when -fgnu-tm is used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386
Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394
Bug ID: 64394
Summary: ICE: in build_linearized_memory_access, at
graphite-interchange.c:121 (isl_constraint.c:558:
expecting integer value) with -floop-interchange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395
Bug ID: 64395
Summary: void_t doesn't work as expected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393
Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64390
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396
Bug ID: 64396
Summary: Missed optimization in post-loop register handling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The reason is GCC tries to be smart of calculating s4 outside of the loop
because the iv that might be selected is not related at all to s4. That is it
might do:
int limit =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
You need to specify -mssse3 (not -msse3). Warning about array bounds is not
correct, because gcc does not know how this function is being called.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
Bug ID: 64397
Summary: memory allocation failed with parenthesis
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
--- Comment #3 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
Patch: jwakely dominiq: this should fix it
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/162240/19281414
Still not committed after almost 24 hours.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The difference in the dumps for
program main
use num
type(my_integer) :: a, c
a=my_integer([1])
c = a ! -
end
and
program main
use num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually one can reduce it even further:
program main
type :: my_integer
real, allocatable :: x(:)
end type
type(my_integer) :: a
a=my_integer([1])
write (*,*) A
call ass(a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64398
Bug ID: 64398
Summary: decltype in different contexts with similar
expressions triggers segfault in GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] Runtime segfault with |[OOP] Runtime segfault with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
--- Comment #5 from patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
Actually one can reduce it even further:
program main
type :: my_integer
real, allocatable :: x(:)
end type
type(my_integer) ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399
Bug ID: 64399
Summary: g++ does not diagnose when upcasting owning pointer
(e.g. unique_ptr) with non-virtual destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to patnel97269-gfortran from comment #5)
I agree that this example still trigger a bug, but I remember in my original
(more complicated) code, the segfault appears when it tries to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397
--- Comment #7 from patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr ---
(In reply to janus from comment #6)
(In reply to patnel97269-gfortran from comment #5)
I agree that this example still trigger a bug, but I remember in my original
(more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Dec 23 23:30:33 2014
New Revision: 219050
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219050root=gccview=rev
Log:
Compile locale-inst.cc and wlocale-inst.cc as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I committed a different fix, which gets rid of the TODO in string-inst.cc, let
me know if it still doesn't bootstrap!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PR 58876
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Already fixed on trunk (I don't remember the commit that fixed it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Woehlke mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
PR 58876
*Almost*, except I am proposing that -Wnon-virtual-dtor should trip even if X
does not otherwise have virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876
Matthew Woehlke mw_triad at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60357
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
program testerprog
use testmod
Type(A) :: Me
allocate(Me%y)
Me = A(X=1, y=2)
print *, Me%y
end program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64395
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by r217250
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64399
Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64389
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
75 matches
Mail list logo