https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64532
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to baoshan from comment #10)
I have a second thought:
As the 'y' is declared as float, should GCC infer the register is a single
float register even the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately your patch dosen't work:
lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xa12f6f crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:381
0x88b190
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Bug ID: 64685
Summary: wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #4 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Jan 20 08:29:09 2015
New Revision: 219880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219880root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/64676
Revert:
2015-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
--- Comment #6 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue Jan 20 08:29:09 2015
New Revision: 219880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219880root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/64676
Revert:
2015-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
It's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64435
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or perhaps we could change SizeClassAllocator64 so that on some architectures
it could use variable bounds. The fact that they are template parameters makes
this harder, but perhaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64677
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libgcc
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Bug 64081 depends on bug 64676, which changed state.
Bug 64676 Summary: [5 Regression] SEGV in tree-ssa-structalias.c
solve_constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64676
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And if I try the obvious fix:
637 else if (e2 e2-speculative)
I hit the assert in ipa-inline.c later on:
lto1: internal compiler error: in edge_badness, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
is not the correct way to set /f flags to all insn of the generated sequence.
Please see how mips/mips.c annotates expanded sequences using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OpenACC bug - the LTO frontend doesn't seem to know about the OpenACC builtin
function codes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #6 from Tom Straub gnu-org at bignm dot com ---
Hi Tim,
After banging my head against the wall looking for a solution to the C++11
UTF-8 support problems, I finally found what seems to be a great addition to my
project, which I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64650
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:51:03 2015
New Revision: 219889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219889root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64650
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64658
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:50:43 2015
New Revision: 219886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219886root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64658
* include/std/atomic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried the example, and added -fopenmp. In lto1, I observed:
...
(gdb) p flag_openmp
$2 = 0
(gdb) p flag_openacc
$3 = 0
(gdb) p flag_tree_parallelize_loops
$4 = 1
(gdb) p flag_offload_abi
$5 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64042
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reported upstream here:
https://lists.opendylan.org/pipermail/bdwgc/2015-January/006071.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:06:13 2015
New Revision: 219885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219885root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63658
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64500
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34498
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34498action=edit
perf report for the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The codecvt stuff was implemented last week. Probably incorrectly, because I
didn't really know what I was doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64341
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can't reproduce this with a cross to sparc64-linux with -m32, can you still
reproduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, -fopenmp isn't marked LTO, so if not anything else, for consistency
-fopenacc should be handled similarly as -fopenmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On the #c2 testcase, gcc trunk now warns, starting with r217957.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64687
Bug ID: 64687
Summary: powerpc: GCC 5.0 (trunk@219851) build failure for
powerpc with hardware decimal floating point disabled
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64341
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Piotr Bartosiewicz p.bartosiewi at partner dot samsung.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 20 10:26:18 2015
New Revision: 219884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219884root=gccview=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 64149: Remove -mlra/-mno-lra option for ARM.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #5 from Tom Straub gnu-org at bignm dot com ---
Created attachment 34497
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34497action=edit
Test Program for UTF-8 CPP library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I wonder if https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00085.html
helps here.
AFAICT it does:
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes12418
# of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Bug ID: 64688
Summary: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated
reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34496
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34496action=edit
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 .vect dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
zhongwei.yao zhongwei.yao at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: markus at trippelsdorf dot net
gcc -v:
gcc version 5.0.0 20150120 (experimental) (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 64685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Testcase usable for the testsuite:
int a, b = 1;
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 5)
__builtin_abort ();
}
int
main ()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64685
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
I'm adding a reduced testcase and closing the bug as fixed for 5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62241
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 11:58:43 2015
New Revision: 219890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219890root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Martin pointed out that the assertion gets also hit in a pure LTO Firefox
build.
See PR64686.
When I comment out that assertion, Firefox LTO/PGO now builds fine with your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64690
Bug ID: 64690
Summary: -freport-bug issue with comments
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64689
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:19:32 2015
New Revision: 219896
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219896root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:19:35 2015
New Revision: 219897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219897root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-06-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64689
Bug ID: 64689
Summary: tree-vectorize generates wrong code with inlined
function - minimum working example included
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 59937, which changed state.
Bug 59937 Summary: [constexpr] bogus diagnostic used in its own initializer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is fixed for 5.0. I'm adding the testcases and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:39:10 2015
New Revision: 219894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219894root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64383
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Yes, this is already fixed by the patch for c++/63657. The testcases are
slightly different thus I'm going to add the reduced testcase before closing
the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:26:19 2015
New Revision: 219892
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219892root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64684
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 20 14:17:51 2015
New Revision: 219895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219895root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-06-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Yes, gccgo ought to enable -g by default. For some reason I thought it did but
clearly I was wrong.
file/line info is needed for the standard library runtime.Callers function,
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
Antony Lewis antony at cosmologist dot info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antony at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64435
--- Comment #23 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can we move the discussion to the asan issue tracker?
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/list
There is already quite a bit of aarch64 discussion at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
Bug ID: 64694
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL:
23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695
Bug ID: 64695
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64617
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is while reloading
(define_insn vec_setmode_0
[(set (match_operand:VI4F_128 0 nonimmediate_operand
=Yr,*v,v,v ,x,x,v,Yr ,*x ,x ,m ,m ,m)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64632
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60141
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64645
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #6)
No. In that case this unwind info would simply be ignored.
Anyway, fixed in r219860.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shenhan at google
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64645
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64632
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64683
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jan 20 16:11:36 2015
New Revision: 219900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219900root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64683
runtime/pprof: Let memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64692
Bug ID: 64692
Summary: Incorrect result for sourced allocate of class(*)
array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
Bug ID: 64693
Summary: [5 Regression] PCH failed with LTO + profiledbootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am not an expert on the machine descriptions or the lm32. If someone wants to
propose a patch, I am happy to test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
--- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry.. wrong PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Perhaps for consistency, we should mark both fopenmp and fopenacc
as LTO options?
Not sure to understand. Is it not what the patch at
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
