https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10373
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
These two issues have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:30:51 2015
New Revision: 220054
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220054root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64734
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64737
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:33:31 2015
New Revision: 220055
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220055root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR driver/64737
* gcc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #16 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After some work on this issue, things have gone beyond my expectations. To
summarize my understanding of this issue and what I have got:
Reason of regression
==
the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64721
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:30:00 2015
New Revision: 220047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220047root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64314
PR c++/57510
* typeck2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #9 from venture37 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to torvald from comment #8)
Can somebody with access to a powerpc-apple-darwin8 check whether this bug
is still present in SVN trunk? Thanks!
Sure thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:19:50 2015
New Revision: 220053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220053root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64734
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:32:34 2015
New Revision: 220048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220048root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-23 Bernd Edlinger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64701
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557
--- Comment #4 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Fri Jan 23 17:55:32 2015
New Revision: 220051
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220051root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from trunk.
2015-01-22 Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64474
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The ICE has been fixed between revisions r197010 (2013-03-23, ICE) and r197238
(2013-03-29, compile), likely the monster commit r197053 for a lot of PRs
(pr38536, ...,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #19 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:49:53 2015
New Revision: 220057
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220057root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64595
runtime: Don't crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015
New Revision: 220059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63637
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
The difference is
--- ipa-icf.s2015-01-23 12:03:20.086849827 -0800
+++ ../stage1-gcc/ipa-icf.s2015-01-23 12:03:14.307833745 -0800
@@ -10348,43 +10348,45 @@
.ascii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] CSE on |[4.9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 23 20:15:56 2015
New Revision: 220060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220060root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-23 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
The function in question is
ipa_icf::sem_function::bb_dict_test(auto_vecint, 0u, int, int) [clone .1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64739
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64737
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015
New Revision: 220059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63637
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #16 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
Should be fixed now.
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with...
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=dg-torture.exp=darwin-cfstring-3.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #20 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 22:26:41 2015
New Revision: 220064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220064root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64595
* go-lang.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Bug ID: 64757
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2353
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02141.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64725
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #14 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #13)
Ilya: I can't speak to the correctness of the above code or patch, but
r220044 fixes the original issue I ran into. Do you want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64755
Bug ID: 64755
Summary: Error in optimization with std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
Bug ID: 64756
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64758
Bug ID: 64758
Summary: [C++11] Give better error message when name of enum's
base type cannot be resolved
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64738
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64725
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:22:29 2015
New Revision: 220067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220067root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64725
runtime: Disable tests that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64758
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com ---
By comparison, clang's error is:
test.cpp:1:14: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t'
enum Waldo : uint32_t {
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64738
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:11:59 2015
New Revision: 220066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220066root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64738
* Makefile.am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Jan 23 12:53:55 2015
New Revision: 220037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220037root=gccview=rev
Log:
Make fopenmp an LTO option
2015-01-23 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #21 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Jan 23 12:54:16 2015
New Revision: 220038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220038root=gccview=rev
Log:
Make fopenacc an LTO option
2015-01-23 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64748
Bug ID: 64748
Summary: OpenACC: is not a variable error with deviceptr()
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64749
Bug ID: 64749
Summary: truncating instructions generated instead of a load
one using SSE AVX2 intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62286
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64744
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #15 from David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead dot org ---
More missed optimistions (gcc version 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1) (GCC))
I see it using movbe for the pointer_abuse() function, but can't see a simple
way to make it use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64744
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Basov coopht at gmail dot com ---
Yep, sorry it's for ARM target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64744
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64744
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Basov coopht at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
Confirmed as well on all release branches.
Ok, If you have no any objections, I'd like to fix it.
BTW, what gcc should do with such code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #15)
{
return (p-data[0] 24) | (p-data[1] 16) | (p-data[2] 8) |
p-data[1];
}
p-data[3] ?
unsigned add(struct pkt *p)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.2 |unknown
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63565
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64760
Bug ID: 64760
Summary: [SH] Avoid multiple #imm,r0 insns with the same #imm
value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
Bug ID: 64759
Summary: The compiler does NOT show a warning in a case where
it is reasonable to expect a warning message.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64510
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:52:36 2015
New Revision: 220069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220069root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64510
* go.test/go-test.exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63565
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Jan 24 00:02:55 2015
New Revision: 220070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220070root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/63565
* gccgo.texi (Invoking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34560
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34560action=edit
Update of Joern's patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34562
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34562action=edit
patch for dbr_schedule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64704
--- Comment #9 from Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com ---
what can i do to make the ptr aligned by 16-byte.
Well, you may skip first few bytes (of course not just discard them, but
process one-by-one).
Fortunately, you don't need to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:45:04 2015
New Revision: 220068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220068root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64573
syscall: Restore line somehow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64510
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
--- Comment #2 from Lakshay Garg lakshayg at iitk dot ac.in ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
!x is the same as x == 0.0 and yes sometimes it make sense to compare
against zero.
It makes sense to compare against 0 but not 0.0 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
Bug ID: 64761
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition
causes some failures on SH
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Even after these changes,
Error: displacement to defined symbol .L59 overflows 12-bit field
remains for va-arg-pack-1.c and a new failure
Error: displacement to defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751
--- Comment #3 from zzt zzt13 at software dot nju.edu.cn ---
Created attachment 34559
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34559action=edit
Add a test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34561
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34561action=edit
patch for crossing jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64713
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is a testcase which shows one of the issues with removing the optimization
inside expand:
int foo_c (int a, int b)
{
if (a 9 b 34)
return 4;
else
return 26;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #15 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com ---
The binutils team has been working a lot on patching vulnerabilities in the
binutils tools. The m32c, however, has a 3-byte reloc that might occur at the
end of a section, and was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64713
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is failing this check:
/* Make sure that the value that is to be substituted for the register
does not use any registers whose values alter in between. However,
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64712
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64737
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64745
Bug ID: 64745
Summary: Generic vectorization missed opportunities
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64745
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34545
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34545action=edit
patch for the alingment issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) bt
#0 0x10a64660 in compute_vrsave_mask () at
../../gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21149
#1 rs6000_stack_info () at ../../gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Jan 23 11:57:43 2015
New Revision: 220035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220035root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR#412
PR preprocessor/60570
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64745
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59766
--- Comment #5 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com ---
Created attachment 34538
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34538action=edit
ChangeLog entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64742
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64741
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
*** Bug 64742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59766
--- Comment #6 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com ---
Created attachment 34541
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34541action=edit
Fix: disable the error for friend declarators.
The fix is simple. Tested and submitted for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64742
Bug ID: 64742
Summary: Incorrect size of UBSan type descriptors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64712
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64703
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34539
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34539action=edit
prototype patch
How does this look as a potential fix? Obviously I'd need to provide the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 09:47:51 2015
New Revision: 220031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220031root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/64511
* dwarf2out.c (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64740
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64740
Bug ID: 64740
Summary: ld called with
-plugin-opt=-fresolution=-plugin-opt=-debug.res
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
