[Bug fortran/64674] [OOP] ICE in ASSOCIATE with class array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Likely a duplicate of pr56386.

[Bug tree-optimization/54000] [4.8 Regression] Performance breakdown for gcc-4.{6,7} vs. gcc-4.5 using std::vector in matrix vector multiplication (IVopts / inliner)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54000 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 9 11:51:05 2015 New Revision: 220536 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220536root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-02-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug target/58757] Advertise the lack of denormal support on alpha without -mieee

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Feb 9 11:53:26 2015 New Revision: 220537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220537root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/58757 * gcc.dg/c11-true_min-1.c: Xfail execution

[Bug ipa/61548] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548 --- Comment #29 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #28) (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #27) Does the following patch fix the problem? Yes! Full regtest is underway but this

[Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hello. Sorry for delay, I was away last week. Following patch should prevent a creation of return values for cases where the called function is noreturn. May I ask you for testing

[Bug fortran/56386] [F03] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- pr64674 is likely a duplicate of this pr.

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com --- If the spammer problem is brought under better control with bz5, sure.

[Bug fortran/64980] [5.0 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug target/63679] [5 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #29 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/64909] [4.8/5 regression] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813 --- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- However I see the following regression (for both -m32 and -m64) FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test It is pr64797 and not a regression due to the

[Bug ipa/64982] New: [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982 Bug ID: 64982 Summary: [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/64982] [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug testsuite/64983] New: Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64983 Bug ID: 64983 Summary: Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/64909] [4.8/5 regression] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64990] New: wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20150209 (experimental) [trunk revision 220527] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c $ ./a.out Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ -- static int a = 770, c, f; int b, d, e = 1, h, i, j; static int fn1

[Bug sanitizer/64981] [5 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64981 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/64909] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.0 |6.0

[Bug c/64856] Initializing struct not accepted in gnu99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64856 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/64856] Initializing struct not accepted in gnu99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64856 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Feb 9 21:19:02 2015 New Revision: 220550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220550root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/64856 * c-typeck.c

[Bug target/64979] [4.8/4.9 Regression] stdarg optimization not able to find escape sites in phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] |[4.8/4.9

[Bug rtl-optimization/64990] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64990 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ipa/63566] [5 Regression] i686 bootstrap fails: ICE RTL flag check: INSN_UID used with unexpected rtx code 'set' in INSN_UID, at rtl.h:1326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63571] Local functions with only local aliases not regparm optimized on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63571 Bug 63571 depends on bug 63566, which changed state. Bug 63566 Summary: [5 Regression] i686 bootstrap fails: ICE RTL flag check: INSN_UID used with unexpected rtx code 'set' in INSN_UID, at rtl.h:1326

[Bug middle-end/64909] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Aha, reproduces for me with -O3 -march=bdver1; -march=core2 vectorizes.

[Bug sanitizer/64981] [5 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64981 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 9 21:23:58 2015 New Revision: 220551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220551root=gccview=rev Log: PR sanitizer/64981 * builtins.c

[Bug debug/63572] [5 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572 Bug 63572 depends on bug 63566, which changed state. Bug 63566 Summary: [5 Regression] i686 bootstrap fails: ICE RTL flag check: INSN_UID used with unexpected rtx code 'set' in INSN_UID, at rtl.h:1326

[Bug sanitizer/64670] -fsanitize=vptr leads to undefined reference to `typeinfo for class'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64670 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5) Updated test case (part 1/2): [main file] compile with g++ -fsanitize=vptr In this test case you have #pragma implementation test.h

[Bug fortran/64980] [5.0 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/63679] [5 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #27 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- We'd want to scalarize this early preferably in SRA as it gives a chance to passes like vectorization to vectorize more loops. I checked that sra-max-scalarization-Osize{-Ospeed}

[Bug target/63679] [5 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #27 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/64813] [5 Regression] 23_containers/unordered_map/requirements/explicit_instantiation/[2,4].cc iCEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- May I ask you for testing on a darwin machine? I have bootstrapped revision r220534 with the patch. AFAICT the patch fixes the failures reported in this PR (tested with

[Bug c++/64948] Lambda reference capture initialization in template function creates segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948 Andrea Azzarone andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/63679] [5 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #29 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #28) On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #27

[Bug libgcc/61309] cilk-plus tests fail with: hidden symbol `__cpu_model' in /x/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../libgcc.a(cpuinfo.o) is referenced by DSO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309 --- Comment #2 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st --- FYI, this is still happening. So if/when DragonFly features libgcc_s from 5.0 in base, these errors will go away? If so, doesn't that imply the linking is making assumptions it should

[Bug middle-end/63451] bad location for the condition in for-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63451 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug debug/53770] Regression: incorrect line numbers in debug info since 4.5+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770 --- Comment #4 from petschy at gmail dot com --- Clarification: I double checked now, and the templated and the non-templated versions (do_print vs do_print2) are the same, with the same disassembly, only the addresses differing. This is true for

[Bug rtl-optimization/64916] ira.c update_equiv_regs patch causes gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 regression] ira.c|ira.c

[Bug target/64761] [4.9/5 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition causes some failures on SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kkojima Date: Mon Feb 9 23:47:11 2015 New Revision: 220552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220552root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64761 Replace MD_REDIRECT_BRANCH

[Bug target/64761] [4.9/5 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition causes some failures on SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kkojima Date: Tue Feb 10 00:00:54 2015 New Revision: 220553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220553root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/64761 [SH] Add jump insn for

[Bug target/64761] [4.9/5 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition causes some failures on SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/64980] [5.0 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Slightly further reduced: implicit none type :: muli_trapezium_t integer::dim=0 end type type, extends (muli_trapezium_t) :: muli_trapezium_node_class_t end type

[Bug sanitizer/64981] New: [5.0 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64981 Bug ID: 64981 Summary: [5.0 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63347] [5 regression] m68k misoptimisation with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347 Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc

[Bug fortran/61138] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with pointer-bounds remapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/64980] [5.0 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||edlinger

[Bug ipa/64978] [5 Regression] ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1060

:1060 0x1280b92 ipcp_propagate_stage /gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:2761 0x1280b92 ipcp_driver /gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:4410 0x1280b92 execute /gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:4505 during compilation of root with g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150209 $ g++ -O2 -std=c++11 -c VTableBuilder.ii /root/interpreter/llvm/src/tools/clang/lib

[Bug sanitizer/64981] [5.0 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64981 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug ipa/64978] [5 Regression] ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, I think I found the bug - when doing the dataflow, we need to push the actual function not alias visited. Index: ipa-cp.c

[Bug middle-end/64991] New: Issues depending on atomic variable type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64991 Bug ID: 64991 Summary: Issues depending on atomic variable type. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, the ICE seems to not reproduce for me :(

[Bug rtl-optimization/64921] [4.9/5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/64927] [4.8 Regression] Surprising error with -Wsurprising (-Wall) and TRANSFER + C_ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target

[Bug debug/64935] [5 Regression] compare debug failure during building of Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/64930] [5 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c scan-assembler-times isync 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64930 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/64928] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Inordinate cpu time and memory usage in phase opt and generate with -ftest-coverage -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/64964] -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 passes incorrect length to _chk functions in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64964 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/64715] [5 Regression] __builtin_object_size (..., 1) fails to locate subobject

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nszabolcs at

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, -fabi-version=0 (which is the default now) has always behaved that way. The question is if we want to change that or not.

[Bug fortran/64980] [5 Regression] ICE in trans-expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/64966] [5 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fschedule-insns --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64966 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/64979] S/390: va_list overflow area pointer is not setup due to stdarg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug testsuite/64983] Incomplete summary when regtesting with dejagnu 1.5.2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64983 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug ipa/64978] [5 Regression] ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug sanitizer/64981] [5 regression] -fsanitize=address cant expand __builtin_ia32_rdtsc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64981 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug middle-end/64909] [4.8/5 regression] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- E.g. unsigned short a[32]; unsigned int b[32]; void foo () { b[0] = a[0]; b[1] = a[1]; b[2] = a[2]; b[3] = a[3]; } will do, or b[0] = a[0] + 5; b[1] = a[1] + 5; b[2] = a[2]

[Bug target/64979] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] stdarg optimization not able to find escape sites in phi nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|s390-linux |

[Bug middle-end/64909] [4.8/5 regression] Missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) E.g. unsigned short a[32]; unsigned int b[32]; void foo () { b[0] = a[0]; b[1] = a[1]; b[2] = a[2]; b[3] = a[3]; }

[Bug ipa/64982] [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982 --- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Feb 8 21:08:44 2015 New Revision: 220521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220521root=gccview=rev Log: PR ipa/63566 * ipa-visibility.c

[Bug ipa/64982] [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982 --- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) Possible fix posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00566.html Does it fix the ICEs and keeps the diagnostics sane? I can

[Bug c++/60180] internal compiler error: in use_thunk, at cp/method.c:338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60180 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/63693] ICE c-opts.c:1067

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/64899] Illegal dynamic initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 9 19:15:55 2015 New Revision: 220544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220544root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/64899 * init.c (build_vec_init):

[Bug target/57969] AIX data alignment behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57969 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57822] I/O: (g0) wrongly prints E+0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 10 03:34:19 2015 New Revision: 220565 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220565root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-02-10 Jerry DeLisle

[Bug fortran/59765] [4.9/5 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with finalizable array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Is this fix committed to the trunk? Not yet.

[Bug fortran/57822] I/O: (g0) wrongly prints E+0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 10 03:34:19 2015 New Revision: 220565 URL:

<    1   2