https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, law at redhat dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So it sounds like the friend declaration injects 'test' into N and thus 'test'
is found but overload resolution fails. Whether that injection is correct or
not I don't know. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65162
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Works for me on x86_64, so probably also latent on trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65164
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Bug ID: 65170
Summary: curve25519-donna-c64 miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65172
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Do you have a test case which fails without your patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65172
Bug ID: 65172
Summary: rs6000 rtl checking failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152
--- Comment #2 from bugger_gcc at interia dot pl ---
This is not what is specified, because C++11 7.3.1.2/3 states that such friend
functions can't be found by name lookup unless it's ADL.
Note that the friend 'test' incorrectly hides the global
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
Bug ID: 65173
Summary: ICE while compiling wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, interesting. When the operand of the delete expression is null the
destructor is not invoked, so it can't throw. It's not obvious to me whether
GCC's result is allowed by the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
--- Comment #2 from Ben Pope ben at pope dot name ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW clang and EDG both fail the first two static assertions here, while GCC
passes all three:
struct foo {
~foo() throw(int) {}
};
int main() {
static_assert(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
Bug ID: 65174
Summary: noexcept() returns true when operator delete with the
object that has a throwing destructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
Bug ID: 65175
Summary: [4.9.2] ICE forming a typedef with an alias template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
Bernd Edlinger edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
--- Comment #1 from Ben Pope ben at pope dot name ---
Whoops, I just realised I should have reported this downstream.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65176
Bug ID: 65176
Summary: config.guess failed to guess machine with 64-bit
kernel and 32-bit user space:
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Bug ID: 65177
Summary: [5 Regression]: extend jump thread for finite state
automata causes miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #8 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Yes, I can see that these regressions have gone away in the latest gcc
testresults on ppc64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34844
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34844action=edit
gcc5-pr65170.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Bug ID: 65178
Summary: incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized when nested loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0)
Hello.
Starting with r218451, http://hmmer.janelia.org/ started to be miscompiled.
Steps to reproduce:
wget
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #35)
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #34)
Frankly, I am not at all motivated to do any significant surgery in the llvm
compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
Bug ID: 65180
Summary: regression in gccgo testcase runtime/pprof on ppc64le,
ppc64 following move to go 1.4 from 1.3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, from what I can see, the problem is that we have during IRA:
(insn 48 47 49 6 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 93 [ D.2201 ])
(sign_extend:DI (reg/v:SI 88 [ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The miscompile happens when compiling src/generic_optacc.c:
with -fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:167 it passes, and with
-fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:168 it segfaults.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
So, patch for discussions:
1) for DECL_VIRTUAL_P trying redirect_callers will unlikely help (not sure
about that too)
2) don't remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
Bug ID: 65179
Summary: Introduce new C warning: -Wshift-negative-value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #40 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #39)
A function will do a deep copy, so I think the only problematic cases are
EXPR_ARRAY, and maybe EXPR_STRUCTURE.
EXPR_STRUCTURE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
See PR 64999 for more discussion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---
command line:
cd src
gcc -g -O1 -ftree-vrp -fexpensive-optimizations -pthread -fPIC -msse2
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../easel -I../libdivsufsort -I../easel -I. -I. -o
generic_optacc.o -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #41 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34846
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34846action=edit
extended testcase
My work patch is:
Index: trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65176
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
Bug ID: 65181
Summary: Support for alloca in nvptx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
On I also see
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -std=gnu++(11|14|98) scan-assembler
function_declaration_before
or
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -Wc++-compat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Bug ID: 65171
Summary: [5 Regression] r214254 causes thousands of
std::length_errors running boost testsuite on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As written right now, redirect_callers case doesn't have a fallthru into the
create_thunk case, i.e. we have to redirect all callers (and all other
references to it, but the latter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
David gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
here we fall through to the case were we make a thunk - IFF we were not able
to rmove the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 23 21:01:57 2015
New Revision: 220919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220919root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63888
* asan/asan_globals.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61740
David gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60741
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
--- Comment #18 from Mircea Namolaru mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr ---
I've succeeded to explain why these casts are generated, and they seem correct.
Graphite introduces new induction variables with a larger size type (then the
type of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon Feb 23 17:51:41 2015
New Revision: 220915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220915root=gccview=rev
Log:
[PR target/65181] nvptx libgcc: Prevent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
here we fall through to the case were we make a thunk - IFF we were not able
to rmove the alias. However, potentially, we already moved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
What about the significance (if any) of the observed regressions introduced by
the patch proposed in Comment 6?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64988
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34847
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34847action=edit
gcc5-pr64988.patch
Patch I've been thinking about, fixes the testcase, but doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Bug ID: 65182
Summary: -Wuninitialized fails when pointer to variable later
passed to function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 19:16:34 2015
New Revision: 220916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220916root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65163
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #42 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #41)
My work patch is:
updated work patch below.
The testcase passes with it, at the price of leaking memory
Index: trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 20:40:45 2015
New Revision: 220918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220918root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-02-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65183
Bug ID: 65183
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: virtual use of statement not
up-to-date with -fcheck-pointer-bounds
-fchkp-use-nochk-string-functions -mmpx
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks reasonable to me if it works properly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65184
Bug ID: 65184
Summary: ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7760 with
-mabi=ms -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 20:37:20 2015
New Revision: 220917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220917root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-02-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Feb 23 21:46:18 2015
New Revision: 220920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220920root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65109
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, if it isn't clear from the previous comment, the reason I believe this
test may be inefficient is because we have pages upon pages of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65117
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tisaac at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65185
Bug ID: 65185
Summary: avr-gcc mcus.def missing rfr2 devices
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
Preprocessed source for llvm-tblgen and gcc command line to compile same would
be appreciated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64562
--- Comment #2 from splinterofchaos at gmail dot com ---
Attempting a work-around on this problem...
struct S {
RETURN_TYPE operator--() {
return 1;
}
RETURN_TYPE operator--() const {
return 2;
}
templateclass =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63427
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:02:50 2015
New Revision: 220921
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220921root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR fortran/63427
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
Bug ID: 65169
Summary: [5 Regression] r210201 miscompiles LLVM's TableGen on
ppc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64531
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #22)
yeah, it's not right yet.. looking at this:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
index e1af8bf..3b5553e 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-icf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r220060.
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
