https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
--- Comment #4 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Thu Apr 30 17:49:02 2015
New Revision: 222643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222643root=gccview=rev
Log:
Define use special macros to record the name size of cold
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801
--- Comment #21 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 30 16:31:36 2015
New Revision: 222636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222636root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-04-30 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #27 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
The primary differences between the 4.9 branch and 5.1.0 are only that the
underlying issue now results in a fatal error. In the 4.9 branch, the objects
and archives (even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
Bug ID: 65950
Summary: Loop is not vectorized with lto.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
Bug ID: 65951
Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize multiplication by long
constant
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65953
Bug ID: 65953
Summary: [5/6 Regression] undefined reference to static
__thread variable
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65953
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Looks like a Mono bug to me. mono_jit_tls isn't __attribute__((used)), and
the compiler determines it is a write-only variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #28 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #26)
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #25)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
Note that the issue should only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is a better example for AARCH64 due to ILP32 using long as 32bits:
void
foo (long long *arr)
{
for (int i = 0; i 256; i++)
arr[i] *= 19594LL;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #8 from npl at chello dot at ---
@Andrew Pinski: The code in question was compiled for arm4t.
The toolchain is not configured for arm7, but has a multilib-configuration for
arm4/armv5te/thumb. No defaults where touched in any way,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
if we use -mabi=ilp32, we can see it is vectorized:
loop:
adrpx0, array
adrpx1, ptrs
ldr q1, .LC0
add x3, x1, :lo12:ptrs
ldr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured with: src/configure --prefix=install --with-cloog=infra
--with-ppl=infra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:41:33 2015
New Revision: 222653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222653root=gccview=rev
Log:
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at google dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||65951
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
Bug ID: 65955
Summary: [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
Bug ID: 65956
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Another ARM overaligned arg passing
issue
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:41:33 2015
New Revision: 222653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222653root=gccview=rev
Log:
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #29 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
One more, at :45:
Matt Breedlove 2015-04-30 20:45:32 UTC
I now have no doubt that this is not a coincidence.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35433
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35433action=edit
Sources in tgz
Using these sources, I can reproduce using just this command line:
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This vectorized for me with GCC 5.1.0 on aarch64-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65898
stanley sstsoft at wp dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Apr 30 22:12:31 2015
New Revision: 222661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222661root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-30 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #29 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
(In reply to Matt Breedlove from comment #28)
If you don't mind, what were the failures you were getting on this one or
did the original reported errors simply return?
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Untested fix:
--- gcc/tree-sra.c.jj 2015-04-20 14:35:47.0 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-sra.c 2015-05-01 01:08:34.092636496 +0200
@@ -4427,7 +4427,11 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65939
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Building rephase.c:rephase with -fno-tree-slp-vectorize makes it succeed.
The loop is basically
register int i,j,k,dir;
register site *s;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Apr 30 15:09:19 2015
New Revision: 222634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222634root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65873
* ipa-inline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also fails with the test input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 30 14:59:21 2015
New Revision: 222632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222632root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add missing PR middle-end/64729 reference.
Modified:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2)
Hi,
Sorry for late response, I applied your patch and got the following ICE:
-std=gnu++11 -flto --param lto-partitions=1
Full command line
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
