[Bug c++/67155] Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/60685] exception not caught by enclosing catch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 --- Comment #4 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net --- Works with 5.1.0 and 5.2.0, so this seems to be resolved.

[Bug c++/67155] Linking of complex constexpr static class member failing across files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67155 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition

[Bug fortran/59746] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59746 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mikael Date: Sat Aug 8 10:40:06 2015 New Revision: 226732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226732root=gccview=rev Log: When undoing symbols, also restore common block

[Bug fortran/59746] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59746 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #40 from Jon Grant jg at jguk dot org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #35) snip which means that there is a path through which a null pointer could be potentially dereferenced. However, this actually cannot happen

[Bug bootstrap/67156] New: config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 Bug ID: 67156 Summary: config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- What target is this on? Because debugging information generate should not change the code generation.

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 --- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org --- It is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu == host == target == build. To what I see in the root Makefile (copied below) at the end of the build files in stage2 and stage3 are compared with

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- It should have stripped out the debugging info before doing the cmp. That is do-compare gets to be: do-compare = $(SHELL) $(srcdir)/contrib/compare-debug $$f1 $$f2 From

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #41 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Actually I think we want the concept of never returns NULL, both as an attribute and as a property the compiler can discover by analysis. Given that property on the return value, it

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/67157] New: Compiling gcc6 with liblto_plugin, v5.2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67157 Bug ID: 67157 Summary: Compiling gcc6 with liblto_plugin, v5.2.0 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug target/65151] [SH][4.9 Regression] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/67158] New: ICE dwarf2out.c:19910/gen_inlined_subroutine_die, at : Compiling gcc6.0 with gcc6.0 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67158 Bug ID: 67158 Summary: ICE dwarf2out.c:19910/gen_inlined_subroutine_die, at : Compiling gcc6.0 with gcc6.0 -flto Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #42 from Tim Ruehsen tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #41) Actually I think we want the concept of never returns NULL, both as an attribute and as a property the compiler can discover by

[Bug target/65151] [SH][4.9 Regression] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 --- Comment #12 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- (In reply to Thomas Petazzoni from comment #11) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) GCC 4.9.3 has been released. This problem still occurs with

[Bug target/65151] [SH][4.9 Regression] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12) (In reply to Thomas Petazzoni from comment #11) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) GCC 4.9.3

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 Дилян Палаузов dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/65151] [SH][4.9 Regression] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Petazzoni from comment #11) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) GCC 4.9.3 has been released. This problem still occurs with GCC 4.9.3, as far as I

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #43 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #42) (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #41) Actually I think we want the concept of never returns NULL, both as an attribute

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:50:03PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at

[Bug libfortran/66557] gfortran gives segfault error when trying to replace file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66557 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/67118] gcc and gfortran started crashing recently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67118 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran

[Bug fortran/67059] gfortran --version output is inconsistent with the rest of GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67059 --- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Aug 8 19:59:16 2015 New Revision: 226734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226734root=gccview=rev Log: PR fortran/67059

[Bug fortran/67059] gfortran --version output is inconsistent with the rest of GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67059 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67159] New: [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 Bug ID: 67159 Summary: [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/49011] Wrong repeat count in error message for REPEAT intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49011 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/50892] Internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7477

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50892 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/25708] [F95] Module loading is not good at all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708 Bug 25708 depends on bug 40958, which changed state. Bug 40958 Summary: module files too large https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/67063] segfault in opening a formatted file at second time with status=replace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67063 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/67073] short program produces ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67073 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67144] [6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE; in get_constraints, at cp/pt.c:23346

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67144 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/67059] gfortran --version output is inconsistent with the rest of GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67059 --- Comment #4 from Vedran Miletic rivanvx at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3) Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the report. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 8 22:01:12 2015 New Revision: 226736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226736root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/67114 * call.c (joust):

[Bug c++/67159] [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 8 22:01:29 2015 New Revision: 226738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226738root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/67159 * constraint.cc

[Bug c++/67142] [6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE: tree check: expected template_decl, have field_decl in equal, at cp/pt.c:1665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67142 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 8 22:01:21 2015 New Revision: 226737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226737root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/67142 * pt.c (equal): Make

[Bug c++/67152] [concepts] bogus partial specialization of ‘fooT’ after instantiation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67152 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 8 22:01:39 2015 New Revision: 226739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226739root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/67152 * pt.c

[Bug c++/67142] [6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE: tree check: expected template_decl, have field_decl in equal, at cp/pt.c:1665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67142 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67144] [6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE; in get_constraints, at cp/pt.c:23346

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67144 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67144] [6 Regression] [C++1z] ICE; in get_constraints, at cp/pt.c:23346

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67144 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 8 22:04:34 2015 New Revision: 226740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226740root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/67144 * call.c (joust): Only

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/67159] [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67152] [concepts] bogus partial specialization of ‘fooT’ after instantiation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67152 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67159] [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 --- Comment #3 from Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net --- Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has landed on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently? i.e., Version=6.0 and maybe [concepts] in the

[Bug c++/67160] New: static_assert feature test macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160 Bug ID: 67160 Summary: static_assert feature test macro Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67161] New: [6 Regression] ICE with a static_assert using our internal __not/__or/__and traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161 Bug ID: 67161 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE with a static_assert using our internal __not/__or/__and traits Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67148] [concepts] Failed concept check when indirecting through a constrained trait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67148 --- Comment #2 from Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net --- Here's a somewhat minimized test case that illustrates that overload resolution works correctly, but matching partial specializations of a class template or variable template does not: