[Bug c++/67160] static_assert feature test macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/61578] [4.9 regression] Code size increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 --- Comment #17 from Fredrik Hederstierna fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com --- Created attachment 36201 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36201action=edit Simple example giving +50% code size increase compared

[Bug c++/66957] [4.9/5/6 Regression] incorrect is protected within this context error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66957 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 18 14:44:06 2015 New Revision: 226975 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226975root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66957 * search.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/67028] combine bug. Different assumptions about subreg in different places.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: segher Date: Tue Aug 18 14:27:50 2015 New Revision: 226971 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226971root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/67028 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/67028] combine bug. Different assumptions about subreg in different places.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/67260] New: [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260 Bug ID: 67260 Summary: [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 --- Comment #11 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10) *** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Sorry, Marek. I did not realize that I had submitted so many

[Bug c/67243] Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However Emitted with -std=c11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/67263] New: demangler mishandles const qualifier on template parameter with function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67263 Bug ID: 67263 Summary: demangler mishandles const qualifier on template parameter with function type Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3) Created attachment 36203 [details] Patch The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:

[Bug c++/67259] New: list-initialization of a reference fails to initialize char array from string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259 Bug ID: 67259 Summary: list-initialization of a reference fails to initialize char array from string literal Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36203|0 |1 is

[Bug target/67226] Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-08-17 00:00:00 |2015-8-18

[Bug c++/67160] static_assert feature test macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- And the advantage of the feature-test macro is that users can test for that specific feature independent of the __cplusplus value. Of course if it's effected by -pedantic then that

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36203 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36203action=edit Patch The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ssaraswati at gmail dot com wrote: Ok, have a further question though. For the current test case, which has the following code -

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Problem also affects while statements; reproduced using example from comment #0 w with for (;;) replaced with while (1)

[Bug debug/67192] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at

[Bug target/67211] [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67211 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at

<    1   2