[Bug ada/67473] New: init.c undefined behaviour referencing misaligned pointer

2015-09-06 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67473 Bug ID: 67473 Summary: init.c undefined behaviour referencing misaligned pointer Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/67468] New: compiler changes template argument

2015-09-06 Thread cas43 at cs dot stanford.edu
trunk/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/craig/new-gcc/i-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../s-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/craig/new-gcc/i-trunk Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150906 (experimental) (GCC) -- and -- g++-

[Bug c/67469] "-pie -fpie" result in BSS instead of undefined symbols

2015-09-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67469 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- It was done on purpose by: commit 130f233477ed03a7bdffb832e7eb9f0a366e0d6b Author: hjl Date: Thu Dec 4 19:40:50 2014 + x86-64: Optimize access to globals in

[Bug tree-optimization/67470] New: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:235

2015-09-06 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150906 (experimental) [trunk revision 227511] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-4.9 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c small.c

[Bug c/67469] New: "-pie -fpie" result in BSS instead of undefined symbols

2015-09-06 Thread nyh at math dot technion.ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67469 Bug ID: 67469 Summary: "-pie -fpie" result in BSS instead of undefined symbols Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67472] New: Finalizer not invoked for undefined and unreferenced local variable

2015-09-06 Thread ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67472 Bug ID: 67472 Summary: Finalizer not invoked for undefined and unreferenced local variable Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66681] Wrong result in assigning this_image() to a complex coarray

2015-09-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66681 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/67471] New: Finalizer not invoked for assignment to array section

2015-09-06 Thread ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67471 Bug ID: 67471 Summary: Finalizer not invoked for assignment to array section Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/66534] Compilation error of gfortran building on YDL6.2

2015-09-06 Thread textdirected at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534 --- Comment #4 from HEMMI, Shigeru --- Thanks for the reply. After my posting, i switched gfortran-5.1.0 to gfortran-5.2.0 expecting something improved. But the same bug has generated at the same place. Then i removed two blocks of

[Bug libgomp/67406] OMP SIMD cloning does not generate fma instruction for AVX2 target

2015-09-06 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67406 --- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente --- does not work... pragma omp declare simd notinbranch float __attribute__ ((__target__ ("default"))) fma(float x,float y, float z); #pragma omp declare simd notinbranch float __attribute__ ((__target__

[Bug fortran/66910] allocatable character in derived type gives segfault

2015-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66910 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67467] [5 Regression] Using "-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-dummy-argument" causes error

2015-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67467 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/63921] [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the function is a type bound function

2015-09-06 Thread mirco.valentini at polimi dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921 --- Comment #5 from mirco --- Thank you Paul, I was trying to follow the Dominique's suggestion and to fix the problem by myself but it was the first time I examined the gfortran's code, and I was still trying to understand its structure. I'm

[Bug middle-end/67239] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

2015-09-06 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 Bug ID: 67239 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status:

[Bug target/67215] -fno-plt needs improvements for x86

2015-09-06 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67215 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > Created attachment 36190 [details] > A patch > > For x86, -fno-plt should be handled by ix86_expand_call to > generate indirect call via GOT, not by forcing the function >

[Bug fortran/66158] Use DO loop constraints for optimizing bounds checking

2015-09-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66158 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/66189] Block loops for inline matmul

2015-09-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > IMO the matmul inlining should be restricted to small matrices, thus I am > not convinced that this worth the work. For large matrix sizes, an external

[Bug fortran/67467] New: Using "-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-dummy-argument" causes error

2015-09-06 Thread exodus6395 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67467 Bug ID: 67467 Summary: Using "-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-dummy-argument" causes error Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66762] ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto

2015-09-06 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- We need to get an lto expert to take a look. Cheers Paul On 6 September 2015 at 03:13, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: >

[Bug libgomp/67406] OMP SIMD cloning does not generate fma instruction for AVX2 target

2015-09-06 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67406 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente --- #pragma omp declare simd notinbranch float __attribute__ ((__target__ ("default"))) fma(float x,float y, float z) { return x+y*z; } #pragma omp declare simd notinbranch float __attribute__

[Bug libfortran/41387] OPEN, STATUS='NEW' of a symbolic link to a non-existing file fails.

2015-09-06 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41387 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/31016] Use __buildin_memcpy and __memcpy for array assignment

2015-09-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/51013] complex::{imag,real}() should maintain lvalue-returning extension in C++11

2015-09-06 Thread ross.martin at ieee dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013 Ross Martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ross.martin at ieee dot org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/67467] [5 Regression] Using "-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-dummy-argument" causes error

2015-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67467 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/51013] complex::{imag,real}() should maintain lvalue-returning extension in C++11

2015-09-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51013 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ross Martin from comment #14) > This change to not be able to pull out a reference to the real or imaginary > parts has messed me up. The assumption being made by this new complex class > is