https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
--- Comment #3 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
btw why nobody confirm my old reported bug about stack-allocated array missed
optimization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66152
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there might be already another bug about this same exact thing but I
can't seem to find it right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
--- Comment #2 from Yuan Pengfei ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. profile-arcs is not supposed to be used in optimize pragmas or
> attributes and GCC should emit an error here but somehow it does not.
If so, how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, this is intentional design decision, trying to register something for an
object that might be living in completely different library and where the gap
might not be supplied is just wrong.
As the copy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
I see multiple issues with ao_ref_from_mem connected with MEM_OFFSET/MEM_SIZE.
I don't remember exactly what was the issue with the promoted parameters
but it may have been with ranges_overlap_p not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68024
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50599
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66625
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67581
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66755
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61931
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54417
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Oct 20 09:50:58 2015
New Revision: 229030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229030=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix default_binds_local_p_2 for extern protected data
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67823
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Bug ID: 68028
Summary: Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or
pragma changes single precision floating point", with
"-flto" on different variant of powerpc like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:39:30 2015
New Revision: 229045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229045=gcc=rev
Log:
Enable VTV for aarch64 and arm
Requires fix for section anchors with VTV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Revision r228586 also caused
FAIL: g++.dg/opt/flifetime-dse2.C -std=gnu* execution test
on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with both -m32 and -m64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51794
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Oct 20 09:37:27 2015
New Revision: 229024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229024=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix default_binds_local_p_2 for extern protected data
gcc:
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67685
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:36:33 2015
New Revision: 229043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229043=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix VTV for targets with section anchors.
2015-10-20 Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 20 10:36:54 2015
New Revision: 229044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229044=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix VTV for targets with section anchors.
2015-10-20 Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68020
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67654
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
> Are you going to fix 5 branch as well? If not, would you like me to do the
> honours for you?
Please do it. I have no free time to spend on GCC these days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 20 12:34:19 2015
New Revision: 229073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229073=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Target Milestone|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064
--- Comment #30 from Daniel Gutson ---
May I ask what's wrong with Andres Tiraboschi's solution approach?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: No such file or directory
gcc.exe a.c -fdiagnostics-color=never
will output not colored error: a.c: No such file or directory
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20151020 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|[5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> I am also seeing this (or another in ix86_compute_frame_layout) ICE when
> running the gfortran testsuite. Again with -mstackrealing. I will post the
> testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064
--- Comment #29 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 20 06:49:13 2015
New Revision: 229021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229021=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67064
* semantics.c (force_paren_expr): Don't mess with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The usual name_registered_for_update_p trick helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, it hits fold_stmt and follows SSA edges via nonnegative but it is not
supposed to (follow SSA edges). Reduced testcase:
void _mktm_r (long lcltime, int *res)
{
long rem = lcltime % ((60L * 60L) *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Bug ID: 68031
Summary: cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Hi Paul,
please compare:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
- Andre
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 +
"pault at gcc dot gnu.org"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #4)
> Hi Paul,
>
> please compare:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
>
> to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
>
> - Andre
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> AFAICT it remains unfixed. GFortran development resources being what they are,
> not all bugs can be promptly fixed.
> But what's the rush to close old unfixed bugs anyway? "Number of open bugs"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #15 from Janne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> WORKSFORME from 4.8.5 up to trunk (6.0).
It looks like a dup of pr59488.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Bug ID: 68033
Summary: OpenMP: ICE with teams distribute
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68034
Bug ID: 68034
Summary: Print warning when memset is optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian.bush at nag dot co.uk
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Hi Paul,
No it's not, but the patch for the other pr addresses a lot of things in the
allocate. Mostly about functions returning class objects, but I remember to
have changed some of the things your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Unfortunately, the patch doesn't fix similar PR67124 and (dup) PR68011.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
--- Comment #4 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
I think this can be optimized in this way:
cmpl$100, %edi
jg a1
jne a2
jmp a3
without any label jumps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #14 from John Buddery ---
I did get a working 4.9.2 build, with the workaround from my earlier comment.
It's a 32 bit build, bootstrapped with the hp 4.6.2 gcc distribution, my config
line was:
$ ../gcc-4.9.2/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
David Barto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51815
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19109
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:29:28 2015
New Revision: 229088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229088=gcc=rev
Log:
Add --enable-compressed-debug-sections={all,gas,gold,ld}
This patch removes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082=gcc=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
It looks like unswitching of outer loops pass simply triggers the issue and
this tree-ssa-loop-ivopts issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68032
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082=gcc=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #13 from Joseph John ---
Yes. i also tried without the mlp64 option both for building the 4.7.4 and also
for building the 4.9.2 using the 4.7.4 but again I have the same issue. Means.
* 4.7.4 build is successful.
* 4.9.2 build fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:26:05 2015
New Revision: 229087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229087=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Vladimir Makarov
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56808
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67068
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo