[Bug c++/68689] flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68689] New: flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 Bug ID: 68689 Summary: flexible array members in unions accepted in C++ Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/68690] New: PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690 Bug ID: 68690 Summary: PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] New: [graphite] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 Bug ID: 68692 Summary: [graphite] ice: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68691] New: ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu in alter_subregs, at lra-spills.c:610 (in 32-bit mode)

with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151203 (experimental) [trunk revision 231219] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O2 -g -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3 -g -c small.c $ gcc-5.2 -m32 -O3

[Bug c++/68478] flexible array members have complete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68478 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68613] initializer-string for array of chars is too long error on flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68613 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00511.html

[Bug lto/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68688] segmentation fault on regex matching long strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68688 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/53548] allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 --- Comment #4 from Mike Frysinger --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) that's fine. thanks !

[Bug tree-optimization/68550] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/53548] allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68693] New: [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693 Bug ID: 68693 Summary: [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/68693] [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-12-4 CC|

[Bug c++/68689] flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00511.html

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] [6 Regression] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-12-4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/63586] x+x+x+x -> 4*x in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to kugan from comment #2) > ;; Function f4 (f4, funcdef_no=3, decl_uid=4162, cgraph_uid=3, > symbol_order=3) > > ;; 1 loops found > ;; > ;; Loop 0 > ;; header 0, latch 1 > ;; depth 0, outer -1 >

[Bug libstdc++/61582] C++11 regex memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kerukuro at gmail dot com --- Comment #17

[Bug tree-optimization/68550] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #5) > fixed BTW, with this fixed, I can compile our CP2K code with -floop-nest-optimize at various -Ox and all seems correct. Thanks! I'll try to integrate

[Bug middle-end/68291] [6 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva --- Eric, apologies for the slow response, I'm in the middle of an all-week trip with little Internet access. I think the best course of action is to adjust gimple_can_coalesce_p so that it returns false for

[Bug c/57180] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57180 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #4 from Georg Koppen --- It is using -lasan it seems: Executing: c++ -o firefox -Wall -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wcast-align -v -fsanitize=address -Dxmalloc=myxmalloc

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- No, this isn't something we'd want to backport I think, For GCC 5, we'll need another (but trivial) fix.

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68676] New: ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_10.f08

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68676 Bug ID: 68676 Summary: ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_10.f08 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/68556] [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/68545] gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp hides compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68545 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68671] New: [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68671 Bug ID: 68671 Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68673] New: Handle __builtin_GOMP_task optimally in ipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68673 Bug ID: 68673 Summary: Handle __builtin_GOMP_task optimally in ipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/68674] ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||65837

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 36897 > -->

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess it needs analysis. Some examples of changes: vshuf-v16qi.c -msse2 test_2, scalar code vs. punpcklqdq, clear win vshuf-v16qi.c -msse4 test_2, pshufb -> punpcklqdq (is this a win or not?) (similarly

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Bug ID: 68670 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/68672] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Bug ID: 68672 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug target/68674] New: ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 Bug ID: 68674 Summary: ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #6 from Georg Koppen --- Alright, thanks. So, what happens with r215527 is that checking for dlopen() working properly in the configure script is not enough anymore to decide whether one needs -ldl needs to get added explicitly if

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 66051, which changed state. Bug 66051 Summary: can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 11:26:56 2015 New Revision: 231225 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231225=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 36897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36897=edit gcc6-pr68655.patch Initial untested patch. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be always a win, when looking at the

[Bug tree-optimization/68675] New: Handle GOMP_target_ext optimally in ipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68675 Bug ID: 68675 Summary: Handle GOMP_target_ext optimally in ipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Version|5.1.0

[Bug middle-end/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug tree-optimization/68671] [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I guess it needs analysis. > Some examples

[Bug c++/68669] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Celba --- Created attachment 36893 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36893=edit Preprocessed run_tests.cpp Added the pre-processed run_tests.cpp

[Bug c/68668] New: [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Bug ID: 68668 Summary: [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 67800, which changed state. Bug 67800 Summary: [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug preprocessor/57580] Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 6+.

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- /home/thomas/Arbeit/Tor/mozilla-central/xpcom/glue/standalone/nsXPCOMGlue.cpp:167: error: undefined reference to 'dlerror' That does look like it is actually one

[Bug tree-optimization/68639] [6 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68639] [6 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68639 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 08:38:10 2015 New Revision: 231220 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231220=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug testsuite/68232] gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Maybe, that's what I'm trying to figure out. Given the comment in arm.h before the definition of CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS, maybe we need to define more patterns, for all the sizes where

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 > > Jan Hubicka changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/68651] [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Missing combination of shift-by-one with other arithmetic patterns with -mcpu=cortex-a53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68651 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c/68668] [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68669] New: -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Bug ID: 68669 Summary: -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 08:43:22 2015 New Revision: 231221 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231221=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68333] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68333 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 08:43:22 2015 New Revision: 231221 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231221=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 --- Comment #11 from Jan Smets --- Thanks. Can this also be backported to 5.x? Thanks

[Bug c/68668] [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug tree-optimization/68333] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-* |powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-12-03 00:00:00 |2015-12-02 0:00 --- Comment

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-12-3 CC|

[Bug bootstrap/68667] [6 Regression] GCC trunk build fails compiling graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68667 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/68669] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/26724] __builtin_constant_p fails to recognise function with constant return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26724 --- Comment #2 from Anton Blanchard --- This issue is still present. The workaround Andrew suggests is good: static inline int baz(void) { return 0; } void bad() { int i = baz(); if (!__builtin_constant_p(i))

[Bug lto/65745] [5/6 Regression] lto ICE (Segmentation fault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65745 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68624] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68624 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Dec 3 13:28:55 2015 New Revision: 231226 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231226=gcc=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68624: Clean up logic that checks

[Bug c/68668] [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68636] unnecessary unaligned load on mips o32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/68471] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4022 with -mmitigate-rop and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68471 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Dec 3 14:17:35 2015 New Revision: 231228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231228=gcc=rev Log: Fix some issues with the ROP patch (PR 68471, 68472) PR target/68471

[Bug fortran/68560] [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I think the problem is that it's actually working. The optional arguments are > removed... When they are not present, the procedure declaration also loses > them. Well, it is not how I read

[Bug fortran/68649] [6 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Further reduced test REAL*8 :: a8(16),b8(4,4), c8(16), d8(4,4) c8=RESHAPE(b8,(/16/)) d8=RESHAPE(a8,(/4,4/)) END > Notice the difference in size of the records. How do they relate to the array

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6) > > Perhaps you need to try with -Wunused-const-variable ? There may be some > > problem with

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Well, why don't you answer these questions yourself?

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36897|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/68676] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_10.f08

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68676 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|alphaev68-linux-gnu |alphaev68-linux-gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/68636] unnecessary unaligned load on mips o32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips-wrs-vxworks Host|

[Bug fortran/68009] [6 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable in anonymous namespace is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- And no, precomputing the permutations isn't going to work, there are just too many of them, and the amount of permutation instructions on i?86 is huge too.

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) > Does that mean we need to define a movv4hf pattern? Isn't *neon_mov providing this (with the VDX iterator) I think what's not matching here is (set (subreg:SI

[Bug c/68533] bogus location for "warning: ‘struct s3’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68677] New: Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 Bug ID: 68677 Summary: Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

  1   2   >