https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 10 08:38:07 2015
New Revision: 231489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/65948
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed in gcc-5-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:00:58 2015
New Revision: 231493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68806
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Bug 68470 depends on bug 68721, which changed state.
Bug 68721 Summary: [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on
x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:05:58 2015
New Revision: 231494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR ipa/68721
* ipa-split.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
> Tobias: does the attached patch fix the issue for your test case?
Yes, it does - which is not very surprising as I did have a column number of 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:19:04 2015
New Revision: 231497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix warnings from including fdl.texi into gnat-style.texi
2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Bug ID: 68829
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9/5.3/6.0 Regression] Segfaults with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
>
> --- Comment #4 from William Seurer ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:41:08 2015
New Revision: 231498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR ipa/68331
* tree-ssa-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, kugan at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
>
> kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
Bug ID: 68830
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at
tree-ssa-phiopt.c:322
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 10:14:38 2015
New Revision: 231499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68785
* gimple-fold.c (fold_ctor_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||regehr at cs dot utah.edu
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68802
--- Comment #1 from Philip Deegan ---
Also occurs with a 4.9.2 cross compiler.
g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/path/to/gcc_4.9_ARMv7-A/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-linux-gnuea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
t.f90:4:0: note: Detected interleaving load *c_14(D)[_13] and *c_14(D)[_27]
t.f90:4:0: note: Detected interleaving load of size 3000 starting with _15 =
*c_14(D)[_13];
t.f90:4:0: note: There is a gap of 999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Maybe we can avoid defining custom expanders if we define
WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for aarch64.
It's defined for arm and the documentation hints that it should be true for
most RISC targets.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
Bug ID: 68831
Summary: [6 Regression] Superfluous -Waddress warning for C++
delete
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't think this is a problem. It would be of course better if the sanitizer
shared libraries were symbol versioned, but in case of libraries that override
versioned libraries it might be interesting to ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The testcase was reduced from LLVM. Here's an adjusted version:
class DenseMap {
public:
~DenseMap();
};
extern const DenseMap &GCMap;
void foo() { delete &GCMap; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Bug ID: 68832
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
[1/1] /home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Bug ID: 68833
Summary: -Werror=format issues an error now
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What I wrote were some approaches how to make symbols that aren't part of the
libtsan.so.* ABI not exported from the library.
If __interceptor_* functions are part of the ABI, as seems to be the case from
wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36980
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36980&action=edit
gcc6-pr68730.patch
Untested fix for the dominator issue. The problem is that the stv pass added
by i386 after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834
Bug ID: 68834
Summary: ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6086
with -O2 -fPIC --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See also pr68717 for more warnings after r231239.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36951|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Bug ID: 68835
Summary: ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with
__int128 bit field
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r211725.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
We're setting range [0, -1] -- not good.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, if you want to reproduce the issue:
% wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boostorg/regression/develop/testing/src/run.py
% python run.py --runner "trippels-powerpc64le-gcc-6.0" --toolsets=gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Because in set_value_range_to_nonnegative the type is and
its TYPE_MAX_VALUE is -1. Huh?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68836
Bug ID: 68836
Summary: GCC can't properly emit debug info for function
arguments in a back-trace when using -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
I've just triggered regression tests with Richard's suggested change:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01154.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 13:23:22 2015
New Revision: 231508
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231508&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68817
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Should be handled via the code we already have for splitting groups into
vector-sized pieces.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
which would kind-of automagically work if we just delay that "unrolling" check
(that's of course somewhat expensive).
There are more group splitting improvement possibilities.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-*-* |aarch64-*-*, arm*-*-*
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17601
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
it's a matter of association being "unfortunate" or vector reduction detection
being too simplistic.
# prephitmp_21 = PHI
...
_2 = pretmp_18 + prephitmp_21;
_9 = _2 - _6;
needs to be associated as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #30)
> Can this be closed? The reduced testcase currently compiles in slightly over
> a minute with -O2 and -Os. Not great, but good enough maybe?
On the 4.9 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> Because in set_value_range_to_nonnegative the type is
> and its TYPE_MAX_VALUE is -1. Huh?
I think that's just a lack of debug printing being able to handle 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48013
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 10 14:20:50 2015
New Revision: 231515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/48013
* gcc-interface/trans.c (empty_stmt_list_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48013
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 10 14:32:16 2015
New Revision: 231516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix dejagnu directives in shared_ptr test
PR libstdc++/68825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
--- Comment #3 from Fan You ---
Yes. I was mean to do compile only test! Thanks for fixing this!!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837
Bug ID: 68837
Summary: PowerPC switch statement performance
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838
Bug ID: 68838
Summary: AIX 32 bit wchar_t testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Dec 10 15:45:49 2015
New Revision: 231524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68348
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C: New test.
Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Jonathan!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63469
zmi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from zmi -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68697
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:11:49 2015
New Revision: 231526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68376
PR rtl-optimization/68670
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:11:49 2015
New Revision: 231526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68376
PR rtl-optimization/68670
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839
Bug ID: 68839
Summary: [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at
diagnostic-show-locus.c:340
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The patch from comment 5 on bug 68473 fixes the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840
Bug ID: 68840
Summary: Wrong code in loop optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:34:43 2015
New Revision: 231527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/68619
* tree-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:43:49 2015
New Revision: 231529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:42:05 2015
New Revision: 231528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
--- Comment #32 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
That patch ought to be trivial to backport to 4.9. I just never considered it
that much of a priority. I'll do a bootstrap/regression test on 4.9 and commit
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
Author: belagod
Date: Thu Dec 10 17:13:47 2015
New Revision: 231531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog.arm:
2015-12-10 Tejas Belagod
Backport from Mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 17:14:07 2015
New Revision: 231532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68619
* graphite-scop-detecti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
Bug ID: 68841
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs
with custom compiler flags
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842
Bug ID: 68842
Summary: Better error output when template needed before
dependent name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
