[Bug fortran/69154] New: [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Bug ID: 69154 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 --- Comment #8 from Mueller --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > I know that allocatables that are declared in the program itself aren't > > deallocated automatically because of the implicit

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/69129] [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- rechecked with today's trunk on Debian unstable, reproduced. The compiler is configured with: configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-6

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 --- Comment #9 from Mueller --- (In reply to Mueller from comment #8) > I think, in theory, the compiler could detect something like > > call some_subroutine(function_returning_allocatable()) > > to be a

[Bug target/69053] [6 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053 --- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, this fixes it, but I'm not sure it fixes it in the right place... diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c index ee32166..bd66aa5 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c +++

[Bug sanitizer/69099] ICE when compiling gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69099 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 6 10:24:15 2016 New Revision: 232099 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232099=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/69099 * c-convert.c (convert) [INTEGER_TYPE]: Drop

[Bug sanitizer/69099] ICE when compiling gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69099 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) > Looking into it. At the beginning of ix86_expand_epilogue, we have: m->fs.sp_valid = (!frame_pointer_needed || (crtl->sp_is_unchanging

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 --- Comment #7 from sv.muel...@tu-braunschweig.de --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > When the execution of a procedure is terminated by execution of a > RETURN or END statement, an allocatable variable that is a named > local variable of

[Bug libstdc++/69152] _GLIBCXX_BITSET_BITS_PER_WORD is wrong for x32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69152 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 --- Comment #14 from Justas L --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13) > Justas, can you please test the following patch Thank you, it indeed solves the problem.

[Bug pch/68758] [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 8 in gt_pch_save (ggc-common.c:551)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68758 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Is your gcc configured with --enable-valgrind-annotations ? Hello Jakub. So the problem is that even though the configure option was passed to configure,

[Bug c++/69158] New: [6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158 Bug ID: 69158 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2598 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 37239 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37239=edit unreduced testcase Compile with gcc -O3 pix.i -flto -r -nostdlib -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] New: [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 Bug ID: 69161 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/63218] More compact std::bitset for small n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/69162] New: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69162 Bug ID: 69162 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69155] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69157] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8176

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69157 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 --- Comment #16 from Justas L --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #15) > Please also do some runtime tests, I don't have the Wine source here ... Wine compiles and runs with no apparent issues.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49358] [4.9 Regression] RA regressed for SSE 2 operand math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49358 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.3.1, 6.0 Target Milestone|6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/68991] -O3 generates misaligned xorv4si3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68991 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/69160] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69160 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37238 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37238=edit testcase ICEing at -Ofast -floop-interchange Attaching another testcase that seems to ICE in the same

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 37241 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37241=edit reduced testcase Compile command line: gcc -O3 tc.ii -march=bdver1 -mmmx -mno-3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3

[Bug fortran/69155] New: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 Bug ID: 69155 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69160] New: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69160 Bug ID: 69160 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1436 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2) > Created attachment 37239 [details] > unreduced testcase > > Compile with > gcc -O3 pix.i -flto -r -nostdlib -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline > -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug libstdc++/68984] error: ‘constexpr bool std::isinf(double)’ conflicts with a previous declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68984 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/69158] [6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/69159] [6 Regression] ICE in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69159 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/69053] [6 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053 --- Comment #4 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to alalaw01 from comment #3) > Well, this fixes it, but I'm not sure it fixes it in the right place... > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c > index

[Bug target/69140] stack alignment + O1 breaks with Microsoft ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140 --- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Justas L from comment #14) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13) > > Justas, can you please test the following patch > > Thank you, it indeed solves the problem. Please also do some

[Bug middle-end/69156] New: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/pr59630.c: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69156 Bug ID: 69156 Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/pr59630.c: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with -fno-tree-ccp Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/69157] New: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8176

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69157 Bug ID: 69157 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8176 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69158] [6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69160] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69160 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.3.1 Target

[Bug libstdc++/68984] error: ‘constexpr bool std::isinf(double)’ conflicts with a previous declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68984 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- This is really a dup of PR60407, PR48891, but it is true that the error message looks a bit different when you write things this way.

[Bug fortran/69154] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69159] New: [6 Regression] ICE in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69159 Bug ID: 69159 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in store_field, at expr.c:6659 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/69156] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/pr59630.c: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at assignment with -fno-tree-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69156 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.3.1 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 14:51:35 2016 New Revision: 232102 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232102=gcc=rev Log: Fix libatomic multilib parallel build (PR other/67627) The all-multi target

[Bug tree-optimization/69163] New: [6 Regression] ICE in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:7086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69163 Bug ID: 69163 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:7086 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/69164] New: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164 Bug ID: 69164 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69167] New: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167 Bug ID: 69167 Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/63218] More compact std::bitset for small n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > X32 also wants long long. Is there a good way to ask for the longest of the integer types that are fast? stdint.h has things like int_fastN_t (btw, I don't like some of

[Bug tree-optimization/69164] [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69154] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug tree-optimization/69162] [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69162 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69154] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69165] New: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69165 Bug ID: 69165 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69164] [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 69165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/69165] [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69166] New: [6 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166 Bug ID: 69166 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4188 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/69163] [6 Regression] ICE in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:7086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69163 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69166] [6 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4188

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69053] [6 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69170] New: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170 Bug ID: 69170 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in find_uses_to_rename_use Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 17:43:24 2016 New Revision: 232107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232107=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy Backport from

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69171] [6 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: on x86_64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69173] New: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in vinfo_for_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69173 Bug ID: 69173 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in vinfo_for_stmt Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/69082] Final link fails on ARM using lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082 --- Comment #6 from PeteVine --- The two lines read: movwr0, #:lower16:.LANCHOR0+32768 movtr0, #:upper16:.LANCHOR0+32768

[Bug target/69171] New: error: unrecognizable insn: on x86_64 with -O2

: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37242 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37242=edit gzipped C source code The attached code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 20160

[Bug tree-optimization/69172] New: [6 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69172 Bug ID: 69172 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/68911] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-01-04 00:00:00 |2015-12-15 0:00 --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #11 from

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/69080] No automatic deallocation of allocatable function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69168] New: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_loop_2, at tree-vect-loop.c:2182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69168 Bug ID: 69168 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_loop_2, at tree-vect-loop.c:2182 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69169] New: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69169 Bug ID: 69169 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/63218] More compact std::bitset for small n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > X32 also wants long long. > > Is there a good way to ask for the longest of the integer types that are > fast? stdint.h has

[Bug other/67627] libatomic parallel build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627 --- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Jan 6 17:32:41 2016 New Revision: 232105 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232105=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy Backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/51049] A regression caused by "Improve handling of conditional-branches on targets with high branch costs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51049 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this has been fixed or at least for most cases. That is the & part is redone during the combineif pass.

[Bug c++/69178] [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178 --- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen --- This check happens in check_bases(), which doesn't take complain flags, so wherever that check fails, it's always a hard error. I suppose the checking function call chains that go to that function should

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Note -g is not needed to reproduce the bug and speeds up the compiling a lot.

[Bug target/45927] autoconf regression wrt .quad availability targeting amd64 from biarch cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45927 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does this still happen in GCC 5?

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 37245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37245=edit possible patch Would this be an appropriate fix? It seems that if the source is a ref we won't copy anything onto

[Bug c++/69178] New: [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178 Bug ID: 69178 Summary: [concepts] An invalid expression in a requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/60890] Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #4 from

[Bug libstdc++/69092] [4.9/5/6 Regression] basic_string constructor and throwing iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3 Summary|basic_string

[Bug testsuite/68629] FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It does fix it for arm-none-eabi targets, the test is now unsupported. I should have done it myself. Jakub was talking about moving it in the cilk-plus directory. Do you think it's still necessary?

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #8 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7) > (In reply to lucdanton from comment #6) > > I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't > > help on my end, the same

[Bug target/62273] doc: Invoke.texi -mkernel mentions undocumented option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/66735] [C++14] lambda init-capture fails for const references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/69123] [6 Regression] --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-debug' miscompiled stage 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/63192] non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not apply const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/69179] New: undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179 Bug ID: 69179 Summary: undocumented darwin attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/38866] [Regression] --enable-gstreamer-peer + multilib + 32 bit boot = broken build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/68813] [openacc] lto1: internal compiler error: in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813 --- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Thu Jan 7 03:28:05 2016 New Revision: 232121 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232121=gcc=rev Log: PR other/68813 gcc/ * omp-low.c

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to lucdanton from comment #6) > I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't > help on my end, the same ICE happens (except it is now pointing to line 6660 > of >

[Bug c++/63192] non-mutable lambda capture by value on reference does not apply const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192 --- Comment #4 from Zhihao Yuan --- (In reply to Zhihao Yuan from comment #3) > Confirmed, please fix. As the standardization of `std::as_const`, this bug > becomes significant. Never mind, I will create another bug report to demonstrate my

  1   2   >