[Bug tree-optimization/69399] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 (due to ccp?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > It works fine with x32 on trunk: > > [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O /tmp/x.c > [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./a.out > [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ file ./a.out > ./a.out: ELF 32-bit LSB

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug testsuite/69406] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69012] gcc-6.0.0 internal compiler error building libgfortran for mips64el target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug testsuite/69380] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr69336.C scan-tree-dump-not optimized "cmap"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69380 alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-none-eabi powerpc*-*-* |arm-none-eabi powerpc*-*-*

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37417 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37417=edit gcc6-pr8.patch Untested fix. Though, I wonder if mod_type_die already has some parent it wouldn't be better to

[Bug libstdc++/69413] [6 Regression] r232327 prevents libstdc++ working after upgrading glibc to 2.23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69413 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, my thought was that it ends up like > cat t2.c int x = 1; > gcc t2.c -o libt2.so -shared -lisl -fPIC > cat t.c extern char _end[]; char *endp = _end; int main() { } > gcc -Wl,--as-needed

[Bug c++/69411] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69411 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/68765] warning for aliasing restrict parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68765 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > Sorry, but I did ask further information in > > > Without explicit interface and the main and subroutine in different files, > > IMO there is

[Bug other/69412] New: bootstrap-ubsan profiledbootstrap issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69412 Bug ID: 69412 Summary: bootstrap-ubsan profiledbootstrap issues Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug libstdc++/69413] New: [6 Regression] r232327 prevents libstdc++ working after upgrading glibc to 2.23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69413 Bug ID: 69413 Summary: [6 Regression] r232327 prevents libstdc++ working after upgrading glibc to 2.23 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/69315] [6 Regression] ICE in finish_function with constexpr and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, it does.

[Bug tree-optimization/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- And in fact, we purposefully raised the maximum amount of memory that we allow GCSE to allocate (precisely for this kind of function). This testcase now comes in under that maximum limit and thus we GCSE

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Also consider typedef int myint __attribute__((align(1))); void foo (int, int); void bar() { foo ((myint)1, (myint)2); foo (1, 2); }

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15) > After discussing this on IRC I'll make a change to support this use case, > without needing to rebuild libstdc++ when glibc is updated. I've created

[Bug other/69412] bootstrap-ubsan profiledbootstrap issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69412 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgomp/69414] New: [OpenACC] "!$acc update self" does not provide expected result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69414 Bug ID: 69414 Summary: [OpenACC] "!$acc update self" does not provide expected result Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58046] template operator= in SFINAE class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58046 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jan 21 10:55:30 2016 New Revision: 232671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232671=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 63427, which changed state. Bug 63427 Summary: hwint.h:250:29: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63427 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/63427] hwint.h:250:29: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63427 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69410] New: friend declarations in local classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69410 Bug ID: 69410 Summary: friend declarations in local classes Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, latest trunk with -O3 -mcpu=power7 -mtune=power8 pr67211.C -fno-vect-cost-model still ICEs.

[Bug c++/69290] [6 Regression] g++ ICE (segfault) on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69290 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69138] Woverflow not triggered for constexpr within template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69138 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/69406] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 21 13:33:27 2016 New Revision: 232672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232672=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/69406 Fix test to check for supported headers PR

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Testing a patch.

[Bug target/69129] [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Jan 21 14:07:01 2016 New Revision: 232674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232674=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69129 PR target/69012 * config/mips/mips.c

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- This reduced testcase started ICEing with r230365.

[Bug target/69012] gcc-6.0.0 internal compiler error building libgfortran for mips64el target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012 --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Jan 21 14:07:01 2016 New Revision: 232674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232674=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69129 PR target/69012 * config/mips/mips.c

[Bug fortran/68769] [fortran] annotate omp data pointers with restrict for -fno-cray-pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68769 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- [Sorry for the delay, email hiccup over the last couple of days] > CCing Eric on whether REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER should be checked in > operand_equal_p and whether TYPE_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER doesn't have

[Bug target/69403] Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69403 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Self-contained testcase that works form -O2 -march=armv7-a -mthumb but aborts for -O2 -march=armv8-a -mthumb: int a, b, c; __attribute__ ((__noinline__)) int fn1 () { if ((b | (a != (a &

[Bug fortran/68765] warning for aliasing restrict parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68765 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever

[Bug other/69412] bootstrap-ubsan profiledbootstrap issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69412 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt --- I'm running into problems testing the latest Gcc with the latest Glibc. The test program is just #include It's a bit difficult to provide the propert args to g++ to make it use the replacement Glibc

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/69409] Internal compiler error with -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69409 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69411] New: ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69411 Bug ID: 69411 Summary: ICE on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > [Sorry for the delay, email hiccup over the last couple of days] > > > CCing Eric on whether REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER should be checked in > >

[Bug target/69403] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69403 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- > How do you ensure that? You could (perhaps through aliasing violation or > union or what) access the same memory slot through two different MEMs, and > if one of them has reverse and the other does

[Bug fortran/68765] warning for aliasing restrict parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68765 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Status 'waiting' means: 'The submitter was asked for further information, > or asked to try out a patch' ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html ). > > Since there's no patch to try out, nor a

[Bug c/69407] -Wunused-value on __atomic_fetch_OP and __atomic_OP_fetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69407 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/69407] -Wunused-value on __atomic_fetch_OP and __atomic_OP_fetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69407 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) > So I believe the problem is that you need to reconfigure libstdc++ with the > new glibc headers, you can't just drop them in later and expect an >

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from

[Bug fortran/69409] New: Internal compiler error with -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69409 Bug ID: 69409 Summary: Internal compiler error with -fcheck=all Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/58046] template operator= in SFINAE class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58046 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #13) > -- snip -- > In file included from .../git/gcc/install/include/c++/6.0.0/math.h:36:0, >from x.C:1: >

[Bug c/69382] noinit()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69382 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules

Hi, i wan't to create aliase (name and type) for the elements of an char-array. Unfortunately my gcc produce the warning "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules", if i use -O2 or bigger. Since i set -Werror, the warning will become an error. I attached an example

[Bug testsuite/69380] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr69336.C scan-tree-dump-not optimized "cmap"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69380 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Does using -march=x86-64 makes the bug appear?

[Bug target/69129] [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69355] [5/6 Regression] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 21 07:59:32 2016 New Revision: 232663 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232663=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69355 * tree-dfa.c (get_ref_base_and_extent): Use

[Bug tree-optimization/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law --- A goodly amount of the problem is PRE (rtl-pre): gcc-5: PRE : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc PRE : 11.16 (34%) usr

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The dividend is val = {-1, 0}, len = 2 (bah, we need a debug_wide_int for gdb use!) We do n = divisor_blocks_needed; while (n > 1 && b_divisor[n - 1] == 0) n--; stripping the leading zeros and

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > so in int_const_binop we end up with val = {-2 }, len = 1 (that's still I think already this is wrong, because I think val = { -2 }, len = 1 for precision 128

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI See Also|

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69378] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69117] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69117 Bug 69117 depends on bug 69378, which changed state. Bug 69378 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/65624] ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 21 09:52:46 2016 New Revision: 232668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232668=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69187 PR target/65624 * config/arm/arm-builtins.c

[Bug target/69403] Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69403 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Jan 21 08:29:28 2016 New Revision: 232664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232664=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-21 Thomas Preud'homme Backport

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt --- Regarding the Glibc fix; do you mean this commit? 2016-01-11 13:34 Adhemerval Zanella * Fix isinf/isnan declaration conflict with C++11 That does *not* fix the isnan and isinf errors.

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, there were tons of richi's SLP changes in the last 10 days. Where one of those changes make this bug latent.

[Bug testsuite/69406] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Give a cost model change exposed this I suspect the cost mode fix (PR68961) hid this again. Just debug the issue ontop of r231674 please - it is definitely a latent issue. Or try -fno-vect-cost-model on

[Bug lto/69408] New: LD crashes with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69408 Bug ID: 69408 Summary: LD crashes with LTO Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee:

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clm at codesourcery dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems the bug is somewhere around wi::divmod_internal.

[Bug lto/69408] LD crashes with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69408 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58046] template operator= in SFINAE class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58046 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- This is fixed in trunk. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/69378] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 21 08:50:38 2016 New Revision: 232666 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232666=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-21 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- nOn Thu, 21 Jan 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 > > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug target/69403] Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69403 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I agree that the pattern is buggy but I can't get the bad codegen to trigger on any of 4.9, 5 or trunk. I get a branch over lines 26 and 27: bug: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0

[Bug fortran/67068] Ambiguous interfaces generated when including open mip fortran header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67068 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 > > Jeffrey A. Law changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug c/69405] [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69187] ICE: Aborted when native compiling neon code with __builtin_neon_vmlals_lanev4hi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 21 09:52:46 2016 New Revision: 232668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232668=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69187 PR target/65624 *

[Bug lto/69408] LD crashes with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69408 --- Comment #2 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru --- there are reqirements for reporting *language* bugs but no LTO bugs in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html I can ZIP build tree but I saw a list of all that i can send in the "we do not want".

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Dear Janus, It's good to hear from you. As you will have seen, I have posted a fix for the first problem and have another fix in the pipeline for the problem in comment #5. I'll

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #11 from Dominik Vogt --- Looks good, the errors are gone now. Thanks!

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #39 from Christophe Lyon --- We have backported r227748, 229160 and 229161 to our linaro-gcc-5 branch, and we got a bug report from the kernel team. Indeed, when the kernel is configured with CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419, the support

[Bug bootstrap/69329] [6 Regression] --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan fails because LSAN_OPTIONS is not honored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69329 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #1) > I tried this patch: > > diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in > index 2733c4d..31ee4c0 100644 > --- a/Makefile.in > +++ b/Makefile.in > @@ -789,7 +789,8 @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug fortran/68768] [fortran] propagate foo restrict to foo._omp_fn.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68768 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/68765] warning for aliasing restrict parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68765 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Adjusted testcase for the testsuite, without relying on stdout output: int r, *s, t, p, a, q, b; short u = 3; static int *v; char c; int cc; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void baz (const char *p, int

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Note that this and the original testcase trigger p.c: In function ‘foo’: p.c:92:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function so I remember adding "return " at the end of foo (it still triggers the

[Bug tree-optimization/69399] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.9/5/6 Regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 --- Comment #18 from RGomes --- The cproto design and usage is not broken. Everyone here agrees that a missing include during "compilation" rightfully should generate an error. It is the "preprocessor behavior only" where we are asking for

  1   2   3   >