[Bug rtl-optimization/69570] [6 Regression] if-conversion bug on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69570 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you could, I'd appreciate it, if not, I'll find time for it this week. But if the bug is in reg-stack, I'll be lost anyway.

[Bug c/69605] printf %f on integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69605 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- If you could pass it along to me privately, I can verify if it's the same issue or not easily (that's the nice things about a PARAM, I can just crank up the limiter and see what happens). I also happen to

[Bug c/69605] printf %f on integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69605 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/69602] [6 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68986] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69606] New: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160201 (experimental) [trunk revision 233027] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-4.9 -Os small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c $ ./a.out Floating point exception (core dumped) $ gcc-5.3 -Os small.c

[Bug libgomp/69607] undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc CC|

[Bug target/68986] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 --- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Feb 1 20:20:56 2016 New Revision: 233046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233046=gcc=rev Log: Update preferred stack boundary in ix86_update_stack_boundary

[Bug c/69605] New: printf %f on integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69605 Bug ID: 69605 Summary: printf %f on integers Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c++/68489] arrays of flexible array members are silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68489 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69570] [6 Regression] if-conversion bug on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69570 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Since the above commit, this bug is just latent, but we should fix it anyway.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69570] [6 Regression] if-conversion bug on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69570 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/69570] [6 Regression] if-conversion bug on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69570 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4) > With the limiter, the time should come back down into the reasonable range > and I'm going drop this to a P4 once that change goes in. However, I'm > going

[Bug libgomp/69607] New: undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 Bug ID: 69607 Summary: undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/40737] Pointer references sometimes fail to define "span" symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/69604] New: ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 Bug ID: 69604 Summary: ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- While playing around, one example from ./gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ shows the same error with v6.0.0, but not with v5.3.1 : $ gfortran-6 -c

[Bug target/68741] FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/cstdio/functions.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68741 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Feb 1 20:22:43 2016 New Revision: 233047 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233047=gcc=rev Log: PR target/68741 * inclhack.def (hpux_vsscanf): New fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So for the testcase we've got merge points with huge numbers of predecessors, which as I mentioned before we dutifully try finding paths through each one. I instrumented the compiler a bit to see what kind

[Bug fortran/66544] [F03] ICE on function with procedure-pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 --- Comment #6 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- When running several private scripts, there was a difference between some scripts including option -fimplicit-none, and some others that didn't. Reducing and

[Bug fortran/69603] [5/6 Regression] ICE: segfault with -fimplicit-none and proc_ptr_comp_24.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69146] [5 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69146 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/69602] [6 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- I wonder when/why it started warning, since -Wlogical-op is not new in GCC 6. This is just a more complex case of PR61534.

[Bug target/69610] [5/6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in arm_reload_in_hi (arm.c:15446) with -march=armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69610 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 37547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37547=edit another testcase, fails at -O2 $ armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi-gcc -O2 -march=armv3 -fno-forward-propagate testcase.c

[Bug testsuite/65940] g++.dg/other/anon5.C requires dwarf4 support in ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65940 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Author: uros Date: Mon Feb 1 22:20:47 2016 New Revision: 233056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233056=gcc=rev Log: * g++.dg/other/anon5.C (dg-opetions): Use -gdwarf-2 instead of -g. Modified:

[Bug target/69613] New: [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics @ aarch64

-df-nographite-aarch64 Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160201 (experimental) (GCC) $ aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c $ ./a.out 8006 qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped Aborted Tested revisions: r233030 - FAIL 5-branch r233025 - OK

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If __NO_FPRS__ is undefined, that means you are compiling for classic hard float. Which means that the soft-fp code is not needed - if you need to keep it in libgcc_s.so for binary

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #13 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Feb 2 00:01:16 2016 New Revision: 233061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233061=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] ABI_V4 init of toc section Since 4c4a180d lto has turned off flag_pic when

[Bug target/69610] New: [5/6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in arm_reload_in_hi (arm.c:15446) with -march=armv3 -ftree-ter (-O0)

abi-as --with-sysroot=/usr/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-233030-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-armv7a-hardfloat Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160201 (experimental) (GCC) $ armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv3 -ft

[Bug c++/49604] forward-declared enum's elements in class scope gets default access (class vs struct)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49604 Felix Abecassis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.abecassis at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/69602] [6 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Since EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK probably expand from a macro to a constant (or are they enums? do we track the original form of the enum or only the underlying value?), this is as hard as: extern int

[Bug c/69609] New: block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609 Bug ID: 69609 Summary: block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/68580] FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68580 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 1 22:03:57 2016 New Revision: 233053 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233053=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68580 * params.def (FSM_MAXIMUM_PHI_ARGUMENTS):

[Bug preprocessor/69543] [6 Regression] _Pragma does not apply within macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 1 22:36:07 2016 New Revision: 233058 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233058=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/69543 PR c/69558 * c-pragma.c

[Bug c/69612] New: Optimizer does not consider overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69612 Bug ID: 69612 Summary: Optimizer does not consider overflow Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/69558] [6 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 1 22:36:07 2016 New Revision: 233058 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233058=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/69543 PR c/69558 * c-pragma.c

[Bug bootstrap/69611] New: Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Bug ID: 69611 Summary: Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug rtl-optimization/69592] [6 Regression] Compile-time and memory-use hog in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69592 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69558] [6/7 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |7.0 Summary|[6 Regression]

[Bug preprocessor/69543] [6/7 Regression] _Pragma does not apply within macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug libstdc++/69608] New: strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 Bug ID: 69608 Summary: strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/69577] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -fno-forward-propagate -mavx and 128bit arithmetics since r215450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69577 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- IMO, we should revert r215450, and fix a couple of cases using narrowing conversions with gen_lowpart that were introduced after r215450. Something like: --cut here-- Index: i386.c

[Bug testsuite/65940] g++.dg/other/anon5.C requires dwarf4 support in ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65940 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69592] [6 Regression] Compile-time and memory-use hog in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69592 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 1 22:39:31 2016 New Revision: 233059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233059=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69592 * rtlanal.c

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69610] [5/6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in arm_reload_in_hi (arm.c:15446) with -march=armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69610 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/62254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz

[Bug c/69612] Optimizer does not consider overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 --- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov --- I have patches fixing the two issues but when I started to test the patches I found that LRA actually has >800 additional failures on power8 in comparison with reload. So I am going to look at this and

[Bug rtl-optimization/69606] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69606 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69548] libatomic fails to build with -Os on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69548 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Feb 2 01:29:58 2016 New Revision: 233067 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233067=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] lqarx and stqcx. registers lqarx RT and stqcx. RS are valid only with even

[Bug target/69548] libatomic fails to build with -Os on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69548 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Feb 2 01:29:41 2016 New Revision: 233066 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233066=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] lqarx and stqcx. registers lqarx RT and stqcx. RS are valid only with even

[Bug target/69548] libatomic fails to build with -Os on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69548 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Feb 2 01:29:17 2016 New Revision: 233065 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233065=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] lqarx and stqcx. registers lqarx RT and stqcx. RS are valid only with even

[Bug target/69548] libatomic fails to build with -Os on powerpc64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69548 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/67548] [5 Regression] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548 Bug 67548 depends on bug 68662, which changed state. Bug 68662 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49604] forward-declared enum's elements in class scope gets default access (class vs struct)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49604 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid | Last reconfirmed|2014-10-16 00:00:00

[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69614] New: [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

oat-linux-gnueabi-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi-as --with-sysroot=/usr/armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-233030-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-armv7a-hardfloat Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160201 (experimen

[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |--- Summary|[6 Regression]

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/69570] [6 Regression] if-conversion bug on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69570 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 1 08:47:27 2016 New Revision: 233033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233033=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69570 * ifcvt.c

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69556] [6 Regression] forwprop4/match.pd undoing work from recip

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69556 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69574] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in hide_evolution_in_other_loops_than_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/69564] lto and/or C++ make scimark2 LU slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/69588] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in unlink_stmt_vdef, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69588 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug testsuite/69590] New: Test script tries to compile source code with "-mthumb" option when running test gcc.dg/binop-xor1.c for powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69590 Bug ID: 69590 Summary: Test script tries to compile source code with "-mthumb" option when running test gcc.dg/binop-xor1.c for powerpc64 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/69588] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in unlink_stmt_vdef, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69588 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69580] [6 Regression] From 26 seconds to 10 minutes moving from gcc 5.3.1 to gcc 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/69564] lto and/or C++ make scimark2 LU slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It looks like we get different BB order out of C++ than C but otherwise no real code-differences as far as I can see.

[Bug c++/69564] lto and/or C++ make scimark2 LU slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564 --- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente --- it is a regression gcc version 4.9.3 (GCC) c++ -Ofast *.c; ./a.out ** ** ** SciMark2 Numeric Benchmark, see http://math.nist.gov/scimark **

[Bug tree-optimization/69184] [6 Regression] ICE in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Smaller testcase for -Ofast -floop-interchange on aarch64: int a, b, c, e, f, g; int d[1]; static int *h = long i; int fn1 (short p1) { return p1 + a; } void fn2 () { for (; f; f++) {

[Bug other/69582] [meta-bug] Cilk+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69564] lto and/or C++ make scimark2 LU slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente --- > Any reason you are using the c++ driver here? Because I am interested in C++ performance never imagined that the c++ front-end could make a difference on such a code... >From my point of view it is

[Bug c++/69564] lto and/or C++ make scimark2 LU slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/69578] -Wuninitialized not issuing warning.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69578 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69574] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in hide_evolution_in_other_loops_than_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69574 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*, aarch64

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I fixed my reduction script, now reducing about ~14MB of pre-processed source files.

[Bug tree-optimization/69579] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 and __sigsetjmp with “tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in compute_optimized_partition_bases”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69588] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in unlink_stmt_vdef, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69588 Bug ID: 69588 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in unlink_stmt_vdef, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1314 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/69589] New: [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 Bug ID: 69589 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/69588] [4.9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in unlink_stmt_vdef, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69588 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/69602] [6 Regresion] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69038] compilation error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug c/69591] New: gcc.dg/and-1.c scan-assembler-not nand fails on powerpc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69591 Bug ID: 69591 Summary: gcc.dg/and-1.c scan-assembler-not nand fails on powerpc64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69554] [6 Regression] Multi-location diagnostics writes too many lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69554 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7) > > Please take this as a humble general suggestion: Fortran maintainers should > > enforce during

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #24 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #23) > That is weird. If you use "GCC diagnostic warning" instead of "ignored", you > should be able to see some changes in locations between -O0 and -O1 and

[Bug rtl-optimization/69592] New: [6 Regression] Compile-time and memory-use hog in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69592 Bug ID: 69592 Summary: [6 Regression] Compile-time and memory-use hog in combine Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog,

[Bug preprocessor/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #22 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > Does the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02347.html workaround > help here in any way? No, unfortunately not. Doesn't change the behaviour in

  1   2   >