[Bug sanitizer/68418] ubsan complains about left shifts even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68418 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 --- Comment #3 from Michele Caini --- On SO there is a discussion about this issue: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35790350/noexcept-inheriting-constructors-and-the-invalid-use-of-an-incomplete-type-that The standard is cited and it looks

[Bug libstdc++/70080] gslice_array's copy constructor doesn't work correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70080 Doetoe changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug libstdc++/70080] New: gslice_array's copy constructor doesn't work correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70080 Bug ID: 70080 Summary: gslice_array's copy constructor doesn't work correctly Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- The comment in the source says pretty much that -mred-zone defines a new ABI for ia32, and that user is responsible to make sure the stack in the red zone is preserved. In non-leaf functions, I believe red

[Bug fortran/70072] ICE in gfc_find_array_ref(): No ref found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70072 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > > Created attachment 37854 [details] > > autoreduced testcase > > > > The testcase is likely very fragile due to the

[Bug other/70078] gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70078 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Hijacking this bug report for more unclear documentation in that section; proposed changes in marked with <...>. Apart from the bad grammar, the meaning of this sentence is a mystery: Splitting of jump

[Bug other/70078] gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70078 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- (I'll make a patch with these and some more corrections once it's clear how the wording should be.)

[Bug testsuite/70055] gcc.target/i386/chkp-stropt-16.c is incompatible with glibc 2.23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70055 --- Comment #9 from Wilco --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > Inlining mempcpy uses a callee-saved register: > ... > > Not inlining mempcpy is preferred. If codesize is the only thing that matters... The cost is not at the caller side

[Bug target/70044] [5/6 Regression] -flto turns on -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70044 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/70035] [5/6 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/70054] [6 Regression] GCC 6 gives a strict-aliasing warning on use of std::aligned_storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/70067] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug c++/70075] incorrect initialization of multidimensional VLAs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I believe this case is simply not supported by the output machinery. It's probably substantial work to get it working unless the FE always emits a full zero init of the VLA and then the partial init from

[Bug c++/70077] New: noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Bug ID: 70077 Summary: noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status:

[Bug c++/70065] Add a new option to suppress a warnings about operators priority

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70065 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- Before your patch, the code uses warning(OPT_Wparentheses,...), and -Wno-parentheses inhibits the warning just fine (this is done in diagnostic.c). If you replace OPT_Wparentheses with OPT_Wwhatever,

[Bug middle-end/70069] Uninitialized value default to zero, plus warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70069 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 --- Comment #1 from Michele Caini --- Actually, the same example does not compile on the web compiler previously mentioned. See http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/81552252ead0d349 for further details. The error is a bit more meaningful: g++

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Summary|[6 Regression]

[Bug rtl-optimization/69941] bogus zero_extend transformation in postreload on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69941 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, here's the standalone testcase using __builtin_abort: int a = 0; int b = 0; int c = 0; int e = 0; int f = 0; int *g = int fn1() { return b ? a : b; } int main() { int h = fn1() <=

[Bug middle-end/70054] [6 Regression] GCC 6 gives a strict-aliasing warning on use of std::aligned_storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70054 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 4 08:31:19 2016 New Revision: 233961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233961=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-04 Richard Biener PR c++/70054 *

[Bug middle-end/70054] [6 Regression] GCC 6 gives a strict-aliasing warning on use of std::aligned_storage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/70074] [C++14] Wrong array write access in constexpr evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70074 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70067] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 --- Comment #2 from Michele Caini --- (In reply to Michele Caini from comment #0) > The following code does not compile: > > struct B { > B(int) noexcept { } > virtual void f() = 0; > }; > > struct D: public B { > using B::B; >

[Bug fortran/70068] ICE: out of memory on involving empty substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65709] [5 Regression] Bad code for LZ4 decompression with -O3 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65709 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org --- Comment #20

[Bug testsuite/70004] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Mar 4 11:09:11 2016 New Revision: 233964 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233964=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64][testsuite] PR target/70004: Remove check using undefined

[Bug rtl-optimization/68695] [6 Regression] Performance regression related to ssa patch / ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- int foo (int x, int y, int a) { int i = x; int j = y; if (__builtin_expect (x > y, 0)) { i = a; j = i; } return i * j; } shows that even without if IRA does the right job we get

[Bug other/70078] New: gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70078 Bug ID: 70078 Summary: gccint: define_split "not" allowed to create pseudos Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/68695] [6 Regression] Performance regression related to ssa patch / ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/70079] New: missed constant propagation in memcpy expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70079 Bug ID: 70079 Summary: missed constant propagation in memcpy expansion Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/70004] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/70059] Invalid codegen on AVX-512 when using _mm512_inserti64x4(x, y, 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70059 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 14:54:00 2016 New Revision: 233969 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233969=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70059 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_,

[Bug rtl-optimization/69195] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr44913.c FAILs with -O3 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37863|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/70059] Invalid codegen on AVX-512 when using _mm512_inserti64x4(x, y, 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70059 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70059] Invalid codegen on AVX-512 when using _mm512_inserti64x4(x, y, 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70059 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 14:45:56 2016 New Revision: 233968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233968=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70059 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_,

[Bug tree-optimization/70013] [6 Regression] packed structure tree-sra loses initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alan.lawrence at arm dot com ---

[Bug target/70059] Invalid codegen on AVX-512 when using _mm512_inserti64x4(x, y, 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70059 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 14:59:23 2016 New Revision: 233970 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233970=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70059 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_,

[Bug c/70082] New: Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70082 Bug ID: 70082 Summary: Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/69798] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Mar 4 13:26:25 2016 New Revision: 233965 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233965=gcc=rev Log: PR c/69798 * c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_expression): Call

[Bug other/69582] [meta-bug] Cilk+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582 Bug 69582 depends on bug 69798, which changed state. Bug 69798 Summary: ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 What|Removed

[Bug c/69798] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69976] Zero the local stack on function exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > From a user's perspective, would this be better as a property of the data > (or of its *type*), rather than of the function? i.e. have the user mark > the

[Bug c++/70035] [5/6 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37867 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37867=edit gcc6-pr70035.patch As for the crash in libubsan, the problem is that -fsanitize=vptr instrumentation pretty much

[Bug rtl-optimization/57676] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57676 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57676] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57676 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Mar 4 14:12:36 2016 New Revision: 233967 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233967=gcc=rev Log: Avoid terminating early in LRA, unless -fchecking (PR57676) gcc/ PR

[Bug fortran/70068] ICE: out of memory on involving empty substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70068 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69195] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr44913.c FAILs with -O3 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195 --- Comment #17 from Bernd Schmidt --- Is this reproducible on trunk? What are the exact flags required to pass to cc1? I'm not getting a difference in REG_EQUIV notes between -fdce and -fno-dce.

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- I think -mred-zone should be disallowed in 32-bit to avoid any potential issues.

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Gabriel Ibarra from comment #2) > I had to add the new functions in the gnu.ver in order to be acceded from > the application. They were added in the GLIBCXX_3.4.22 section, is it the > right

[Bug libstdc++/70081] New: Document how to add new symbols to libstdc++ exports

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70081 Bug ID: 70081 Summary: Document how to add new symbols to libstdc++ exports Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/70081] Document how to add new symbols to libstdc++ exports

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70081 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69976] Zero the local stack on function exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Gutson --- BTW, please reassign this to gabriel.iba...@tallertechnologies.com since Aurelio is still working on qemu. Sorry for the inconveniences.

[Bug tree-optimization/70026] [6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 with -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70026 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70035] [5/6 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Is there any reason why the compiler couldn't warn in this case at compile > time? I think that would be a useful warning.

[Bug tree-optimization/51017] [4.9/5/6 Regression] GCC performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5), PRE increases register pressure too much

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- GCC 4.5 vs GCC 5 still shows GCC 4.5 is faster almost everywhere Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE Benchmarking: Traditional DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE Many salts:

[Bug target/70044] [5/6 Regression] -flto turns on -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70044 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00357.html

[Bug middle-end/69976] Zero the local stack on function exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > But even if you clear the sensitive data from the stack array, it might > still live in the registers from which you stored the sensitive data into > that array

[Bug c/70082] Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70082 --- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell --- ... and non-local variable access should be disallowed, as well as TLS variables, and anything that needs a constructor to be initialized (non-POD).

[Bug c/68187] [6 Regression] Poor error message from -Wmisleading-indentation on glibc's ../stdlib/strtol_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Mar 4 15:50:27 2016 New Revision: 233972 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233972=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68187: fix overzealous -Wmisleading-indentation (comment #1)

[Bug c++/70067] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 16:07:20 2016 New Revision: 233973 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233973=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70067 * tree.c (strip_typedefs): Handle TYPENAME_TYPE

[Bug testsuite/70055] gcc.target/i386/chkp-stropt-16.c is incompatible with glibc 2.23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70055 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #9) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > Inlining mempcpy uses a callee-saved register: > > > ... > > > > Not inlining mempcpy is preferred. > > If codesize is the only

[Bug c/68187] [6 Regression] Poor error message from -Wmisleading-indentation on glibc's ../stdlib/strtol_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Mar 4 15:45:19 2016 New Revision: 233971 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233971=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68187: fix overzealous -Wmisleading-indentation (comment #0)

[Bug c/70082] Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70082 --- Comment #2 from Carlos O'Donell --- There might be the case where it is argued that documentation is all that is needed, but that doesn't yield a robust implementation. My biggest worry after seeing gperftools/tcmalloc use IFUNC is that it

[Bug target/70083] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409 with -fschedule-insns @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70083 Bug ID: 70083 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409 with -fschedule-insns @ i686 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70067] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 16:08:06 2016 New Revision: 233974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233974=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70067 * tree.c (strip_typedefs): Handle TYPENAME_TYPE

[Bug c/70082] Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70082 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't think the compiler should do the policeman here, it is enough if glibc documents what it does and doesn't support in ifunc (which is of course generally arch dependent, it really depends on if you

[Bug c++/70067] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70067 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/70082] Attribute ifunc marked functions should not be allowed to call other functions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70082 --- Comment #4 from Carlos O'Donell --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I don't think the compiler should do the policeman here, it is enough if > glibc documents what it does and doesn't support in ifunc (which is of > course

[Bug c/68187] [6 Regression] Poor error message from -Wmisleading-indentation on glibc's ../stdlib/strtol_l.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/59666] IBM long double arithmetic results invalid in non-default rounding modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 4 Mar 2016, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59666 > > --- Comment #5 from Vincent Lefèvre --- > (In reply to

[Bug target/70083] [6 Regression] ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409 with -fschedule-insns -mavx512* @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70083 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70086] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2202 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mavx512vl -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70086 Bug ID: 70086 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2202 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mavx512vl -ffloat-store Product:

[Bug c/70085] New: False positive -Wmisleading-indentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70085 Bug ID: 70085 Summary: False positive -Wmisleading-indentation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/70087] New: Different (worse?) code generated for if (a || (b || c)) generates different (worse?) code than if (a || b || c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087 Bug ID: 70087 Summary: Different (worse?) code generated for if (a || (b || c)) generates different (worse?) code than if (a || b || c) Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug c++/70035] [5/6 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 22:10:49 2016 New Revision: 233984 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233984=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70035 * cp-tree.h (cp_ubsan_maybe_initialize_vtbl_ptrs): New

[Bug c/70087] Different (worse?) code generated for "if (a || (b || c))" vs "if (a || b || c)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Different (worse?) code |Different (worse?) code

[Bug c/70085] False positive -Wmisleading-indentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70085 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- I think David changed that a couple days ago (PR 68187), could you try a more recent snapshot?

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 22:09:19 2016 New Revision: 233983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233983=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67364 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference):

[Bug c/70087] Different (worse?) code generated for "if (a || (b || c))" vs "if (a || b || c)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 22:08:22 2016 New Revision: 233982 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233982=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67364 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference):

[Bug target/70062] ICE: in decide_alg, at config/i386/i386.c:26173 with -mmemcpy-strategy=libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70062 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 20:28:27 2016 New Revision: 233979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233979=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70062 * config/i386/i386.c (decide_alg): Add RECUR

[Bug c/70087] Different (worse?) code generated for "if (a || (b || c))" vs "if (a || b || c)"

orl %edx, %eax movzbl %al, %eax ret .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L4: movl$1, %eax movzbl %al, %eax ret .cfi_endproc .LFE1: .size bar, .-bar .comm at,4,4 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 2016030

[Bug regression/67415] [5/6 Regression] -mcpu= breaks -print-file-name for ARM crosscompilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67415 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/70086] [6 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2202 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mavx512vl -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70086 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66543] False positive warning "variable set but not used"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66543 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/70086] [6 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2202 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mavx512vl -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70086 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/70035] [5 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] Calling a |[5 Regression] Calling a

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 22:53:29 2016 New Revision: 233987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233987=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69203 * cp-tree.h (COND_EXPR_IS_VEC_DELETE): New. *

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) > I've now fixed (for GCC 6) all the bugs that affect Hana except for 47226. That is, that break parts of 'make check'. There's also bug 66543, but that's just a

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- I've now fixed (for GCC 6) all the bugs that affect Hana except for 47226.

[Bug c/70085] False positive -Wmisleading-indentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70085 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70084] [6 Regression] va_arg ((ap), int) regression on s390*-*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70084 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37869 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37869=edit gcc6-pr70084.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/70071] ICE on wrong usage of a subscript triplet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70071 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >