[Bug fortran/70950] ICE with -O0 in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5895

2016-05-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70950 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of pr70949. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 70949 ***

[Bug libstdc++/70360] abi_check FAILs with --enable-vtable-verify

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70360 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- #0 tree_code_size (code=code@entry=CONSTRUCTOR) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:848 #1 0x00fc562d in make_node_stat (code=code@entry=CONSTRUCTOR) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:1005 #2 0x00fc88e4

[Bug target/70941] [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 --- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer --- That fixed the issues on power, thanks!

[Bug c++/70979] [C++14] g++ falsely accepts constexpr function returning a lambda

2016-05-06 Thread felix.morgner at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70979 --- Comment #2 from Felix Morgner --- That is why I explicitly referred to C++14. I strongly believe, that the right thing to do would be to disable it (handle it as an error) since it is just that when compiling in C++14 mode. Maybe the error

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-05-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70961] Regrename ignores preferred_rename_class

2016-05-06 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- As for a simple example, Proc_4 in Dhrystone is a good one. With -O2 and -fno-rename-registers I get the following on Thumb-2: 00c8 : c8: b430push{r4, r5} ca: f240 0300 movwr3,

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-05-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Configuration for the two compilers used: $GCC_SRC/configure --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go --with-cpu=power7 --disable-libsanitizer

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-05-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- The other odd thing is that we fail only on the signed and unsigned long long cases, and all of the other variants work.

[Bug fortran/70949] Invalid aggregate against pointer comparison

2016-05-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70949 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 70950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/70961] Regrename ignores preferred_rename_class

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > In which case it should not rename that chain rather than just ignore the > preference (and a preference of NO_REGS should probably also block renaming). That's not what the hook was initially designed

[Bug target/70981] New: [7 regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c FAILs

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70981 Bug ID: 70981 Summary: [7 regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70941] [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- unsigned char perhaps? Let me fix up the testcase. It has other non-portable assumptions.

[Bug c++/70979] [C++14] g++ falsely accepts constexpr function returning a lambda

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70979 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug middle-end/70980] ICE pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1056

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70980 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/70980] New: ICE pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1056

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70980 Bug ID: 70980 Summary: ICE pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1056 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/70981] [7 regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c FAILs

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70981 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libstdc++/70360] abi_check FAILs with --enable-vtable-verify

2016-05-06 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70360 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- > I'm seeing the abi_check failure with --enable-vtable-verify on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and i386-pc-solaris2.12: 7 incompatible symbols 0

[Bug libstdc++/70982] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc etc. FAIL with --enable-vtable-verify

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70982 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/70201] Dump C++ template instantiations

2016-05-06 Thread andres.tiraboschi at tallertechnologies dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70201 Andrés Agustín Tiraboschi changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38139|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/70941] [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug target/63596] Saving of GPR/FPRs for stdarg even though the variable argument is not used

2016-05-06 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63596 --- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang --- A patch set which clean up variable argument support on AArch64 has been sent for review https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00508.html

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

2016-05-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread aleksandergajewski at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 --- Comment #4 from Aleksander Gajewski --- Created attachment 38430 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38430=edit Preprocessed file compiled by gcc-6.1.

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog,

[Bug target/70941] [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 6 15:23:56 2016 New Revision: 235978 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235978=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/70941 * gcc.dg/torture/pr70941.c (abort): Remove

[Bug c++/70983] False ambiguity on member function rvalue overload using auto

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70983] False ambiguity on member function rvalue overload using auto

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

2016-05-06 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160506 (experimental) [trunk revision 235952] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:15:1: error: invalid operand in unary operation fn2 () ^~~ # VUSE <.MEM_

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-05-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- I applied the same patch to gcc-6-branch, and the test works correctly on a Power7 machine. Thus we appear to be exposing a recent problem introduced on trunk. I'll try to bisect this.

[Bug c++/70943] Bogus 'conflicting declaration' error with repeated typedefs in function templates

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70943 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/70984] New: Templated derived class erroneously allows taking address of private base class member functions

2016-05-06 Thread awise.gcc.bug at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70984 Bug ID: 70984 Summary: Templated derived class erroneously allows taking address of private base class member functions Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/70956] [6/7 Regression] ICE in build_cross_bb_scalars_def, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1725

2016-05-06 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |6.2

[Bug libstdc++/70982] New: experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc etc. FAIL with --enable-vtable-verify

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70982 Bug ID: 70982 Summary: experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.c c etc. FAIL with --enable-vtable-verify Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70983] New: False ambiguity on member function rvalue overload using auto

2016-05-06 Thread jackweston at live dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70983 Bug ID: 70983 Summary: False ambiguity on member function rvalue overload using auto Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread aleksandergajewski at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 --- Comment #3 from Aleksander Gajewski --- Created attachment 38429 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38429=edit Preprocessed file Preprocessed file causing gcc-6.1 crash.

[Bug target/58219] [SH] mov.l insn length is wrong on SH2A

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58219 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/52933] SH Target: Use div0s for integer sign comparisons

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52933 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70986] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in combine_blocks, at tree-if-conv.c:2219

2016-05-06 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160506 (experimental) [trunk revision 235952] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:12:1: internal compiler error: in combine_blocks, at tree-if-conv.c:2219

[Bug tree-optimization/70956] [6/7 Regression] ICE in build_cross_bb_scalars_def, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1725

2016-05-06 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70956 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/70987] New: missing -Wuninitialized calling built-in string functions with an uninitialized argument

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70987 Bug ID: 70987 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized calling built-in string functions with an uninitialized argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/70988] New: missing buffer overflow warning on chained strcat calls

2016-05-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70988 Bug ID: 70988 Summary: missing buffer overflow warning on chained strcat calls Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70989] New: [SH] Further improve utilization of zero-displacement conditional branches

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70989 Bug ID: 70989 Summary: [SH] Further improve utilization of zero-displacement conditional branches Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/70990] New: [SH] Unreachable basic blocks

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70990 Bug ID: 70990 Summary: [SH] Unreachable basic blocks Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/70991] New: Uninitialized class allowed if it came from self-assignment, or a member function

2016-05-06 Thread appfault at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70991 Bug ID: 70991 Summary: Uninitialized class allowed if it came from self-assignment, or a member function Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70991] Uninitialized class allowed if it came from self-assignment, or a member function

2016-05-06 Thread appfault at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70991 --- Comment #1 from bennet brauer --- Created attachment 38433 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38433=edit two similar test cases in one cpp file

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-05-06 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- The test also passed on P7 at the time I committed the patch.

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

2016-05-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the second patch in comment 9 applied on top of my working tree (heavily patched), I get [Book15] f90/bug% gfc /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_4.f90

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

2016-05-06 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 6 May 2016, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 > > --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > With the second patch in comment 9

[Bug tree-optimization/70964] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:351

2016-05-06 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another testcase that started ICEing with r235842. int a, b; int fn1 (int p1) { return p1 < 0 ? p1 : a; } void fn2 () { lbl_100: b = 1; for (; b != 21; b = fn1 (b)) ; goto lbl_100;

[Bug rtl-optimization/70961] Regrename ignores preferred_rename_class

2016-05-06 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70961 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2) > Pass #2 ignores it since the preference simply couldn't be honored. In which case it should not rename that chain rather than just ignore the preference (and a

[Bug libstdc++/70975] New: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 Bug ID: 70975 Summary: experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

2016-05-06 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/70976] New: Useless vectorization leads to degradation of performance

2016-05-06 Thread b7.10110111 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70976 Bug ID: 70976 Summary: Useless vectorization leads to degradation of performance Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70972] New: [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-05-06 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Bug ID: 70972 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70949] Invalid aggregate against pointer comparison

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70949 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70931] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -g in native_encode_initializer, bei dwarf2out.c:17768

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70931 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6/7

[Bug target/70941] [5/6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto, wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/70972] [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/70970] Misaligned SSE with auto-vectorization

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70970 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70964] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:351

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-*

[Bug target/59400] [SH] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55921.c fails with -O0 on big endian with FPU

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59400 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70960] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in ifcvt_walk_pattern_tree, at tree-if-conv.c:2465

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70960 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Target

[Bug tree-optimization/70960] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in ifcvt_walk_pattern_tree, at tree-if-conv.c:2465

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70960 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/70948] [7 Regression] r235622 caused gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-pack-1.c execution failure AArch64

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70948 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70749] error: storage size of ‘a’ isn’t known goes away with -Os

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70749 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/70950] ICE with -O0 in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5895

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70950 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70931] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -g in native_encode_initializer, bei dwarf2out.c:17768

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70931 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 6 07:44:22 2016 New Revision: 235944 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235944=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-06 Richard Biener PR middle-end/70931

[Bug tree-optimization/70964] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in single_succ_edge, at basic-block.h:351

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- 1736 latch_edge = single_succ_edge (get_bb_copy (loop->latch)); the fake edges make loop structure "invalid"

[Bug tree-optimization/70965] [7 Regression] ICE on released SSA name during IPA SRA

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70965 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Target

[Bug c++/70972] [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-05-06 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 --- Comment #1 from TC --- Originally from http://stackoverflow.com/q/37064993/2756719

[Bug c++/70972] [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-05-06 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 --- Comment #2 from TC --- Not exactly that familiar with GCC, but looking at https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/cp/method.c?r1=233719=233718=233719 tree type = TREE_TYPE (parm); if (DECL_PACK_P (parm)) type =

[Bug target/70941] [5/6/7 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 6 07:38:27 2016 New Revision: 235943 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235943=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-06 Richard Biener PR middle-end/70941

[Bug bootstrap/70969] power64le ada bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- r216965 missed system-linux-ppc64.ads when it added pragma No_Elaboration_Code_All.

[Bug ada/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri May 6 09:11:38 2016 New Revision: 235946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235946=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/70969 * system-darwin-ppc64.ads: Add pragma

[Bug ada/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri May 6 09:11:56 2016 New Revision: 235947 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235947=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/70969 * system-darwin-ppc64.ads: Add pragma

[Bug ada/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri May 6 09:12:09 2016 New Revision: 235948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235948=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/70969 * system-darwin-ppc64.ads: Add pragma

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/69443] -fsanitize=address should add -lpthread to linker call

2016-05-06 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69443 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/70875] ICE in get_ubsan_type_info_for_type with -fsanitize=undefined

2016-05-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70875 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri May 6 09:47:25 2016 New Revision: 235951 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235951=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/70875 * ubsan.c (get_ubsan_type_info_for_type):

[Bug bootstrap/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ada/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

2016-05-06 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #45 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Fri May 6 09:41:57 2016 New Revision: 235950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235950=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/54089 * config/sh/sh.md (*rotcr): Add another

[Bug bootstrap/70969] [7 regression] bootstrap failure: s-unstyp.ads:40:15: violation of No_Elaboration_Code_All at line 42

2016-05-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70969 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70904] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fno-split-wide-types @ aarch64

2016-05-06 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70904 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- So it looks like we gimplify type sizes multiple times (in what order?!) and from ..__result = MAX_EXPR <*n, 0>; typedef character(kind=1) struct

[Bug tree-optimization/70948] [7 Regression] r235622 caused gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-pack-1.c execution failure AArch64

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70948 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70948] [7 Regression] r235622 caused gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-pack-1.c execution failure AArch64

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70948 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 6 12:53:26 2016 New Revision: 235963 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235963=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-06 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/70970] Misaligned SSE with auto-vectorization

2016-05-06 Thread rcc.dark at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70970 --- Comment #4 from Rodrigo --- Well, without auto-vectorization the code should work (x86 allows non-SSE misaligned reads and writes). But I think understand your rationale. Thanks.

[Bug c++/70977] Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread aleksandergajewski at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Aleksander Gajewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aleksandergajewski at gmail dot

[Bug c++/70979] New: [C++14] g++ falsely accepts constexpr function returning a lambda

2016-05-06 Thread felix.morgner at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70979 Bug ID: 70979 Summary: [C++14] g++ falsely accepts constexpr function returning a lambda Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70977] New: Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

2016-05-06 Thread aleksandergajewski at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Bug ID: 70977 Summary: Error during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails). Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

2016-05-06 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 6 May 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, 6 May 2016, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 > > > > --- Comment #10 from Dominique

[Bug debug/70935] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 9 does not dominate use in block 12) w/ -O3 -g

2016-05-06 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70935 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri May 6 12:07:25 2016 New Revision: 235962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235962=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ 2016-05-06 Yuri Rumyantsev PR debug/70935

[Bug target/70976] Useless vectorization leads to degradation of performance

2016-05-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70976 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/70978] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1428 on arm

2016-05-06 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70978 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4, 6.1.0, 7.0 Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/70978] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1428 on arm

2016-05-06 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70978 Bug ID: 70978 Summary: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1428 on arm Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70973] New: x86: Can the __atomic_*() operations be made to list the LOCK prefixes?

2016-05-06 Thread dhowells at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70973 Bug ID: 70973 Summary: x86: Can the __atomic_*() operations be made to list the LOCK prefixes? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >