[Bug tree-optimization/71060] New: Compiler reports "loop vectorized" but actually it was not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71060 Bug ID: 71060 Summary: Compiler reports "loop vectorized" but actually it was not Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70876] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code with_size_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed May 11 09:51:49 2016 New Revision: 236115 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236115=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline r236086. 2016-05-10 Ilya Enkovich

[Bug fortran/70855] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp in gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #18 from shatz at dsit dot co.il --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #15) > (In reply to shatz from comment #14) > > It is not documented that __attribute__((optimize(""))) works reliably when > > Unfortunately, you

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/70986] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in combine_blocks, at tree-if-conv.c:2219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Other loop opts don't necessarily like this (I get regressions).

[Bug middle-end/70807] fwprop pass ICE with incoming CDI_DOMINATORS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed May 11 09:33:13 2016 New Revision: 236114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236114=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/70807 * cfgrtl.h (delete_insn_and_edges):

[Bug c++/71054] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:8097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem is that with the PTRMEM_CST handling moved from the gimplification hook to genericization (the right thing), as apparently we don't genericize DECL_INITIAL of VAR_DECLs, nothing handles the

[Bug tree-optimization/71060] Compiler reports "loop vectorized" but actually it was not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71060 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/70876] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code with_size_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- 6.1.1 is not a release, it's the current development snapshot from the gcc-6 branch. It will be fixed in a later version.

[Bug tree-optimization/71050] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c fails starting with r236066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target

[Bug middle-end/70877] [MPX] ICE in in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed May 11 09:55:55 2016 New Revision: 236116 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236116=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline r236088. 2016-05-10 Ilya Enkovich

[Bug middle-end/70877] [MPX] ICE in in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71053] [6/7 Regression] Volatile read optimized into endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71053 --- Comment #2 from Michael Weiser --- Also happens with trunk r236113: # ~/bin/gcc-trunk-20160511-avr/bin/avr-g++ -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations -Os t.c -o t.S -S -v Using built-in specs. Reading

[Bug libstdc++/71049] [6/7 Regression] libstdc++ fails to build --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible --disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 11 12:39:28 2016 New Revision: 236118 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236118=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++/71049 fix --disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi bootstrap PR

[Bug libstdc++/71049] [6/7 Regression] libstdc++ fails to build --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible --disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/71049] [6/7 Regression] libstdc++ fails to build --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible --disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/70855] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp in gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/71060] Compiler reports "loop vectorized" but actually it was not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71060 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/71006] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in conditional expression) w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I've just been notified that the bug is fixed in Xcode 7.3.1. > Will try that as soon as it hits the Appstore. I have Xcode 7.3.1 since May 4.

[Bug target/71061] New: [ARM] is not setting instruction length for pop* patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71061 Bug ID: 71061 Summary: [ARM] is not setting instruction length for pop* patterns Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/70876] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code with_size_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich --- Fixed in trunk by r236086

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #8 from Wei-Wei Tu --- Would this bug be fixed in gcc 6.1.1 or in later version?

[Bug target/71061] [ARM] is not setting instruction length for pop* patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71061 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.ettedgui at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71050] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c fails starting with r236066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Sorry, accidentally saved before finishing my thoughts. How do we "inform" the middle-end that a DI subreg of a DF is very expensive? This differs wildly by processor for us. We "can" always do the subreg,

[Bug c++/71054] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:8097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek --- Markus recently committed a patch (r235580) that points out that this attribute should only be used for debugging.

[Bug fortran/70855] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp in gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 11 13:18:05 2016 New Revision: 236120 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236120=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/70855 * frontend-passes.c (inline_matmul_assign):

[Bug tree-optimization/71050] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c fails starting with r236066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/71055] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53663-1.c -Os execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71055 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 11 14:04:32 2016 New Revision: 236122 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236122=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-11 Richard Biener PR

[Bug fortran/70855] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp in gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 11 13:16:48 2016 New Revision: 236119 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236119=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/70855 * frontend-passes.c (inline_matmul_assign):

[Bug tree-optimization/71055] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53663-1.c -Os execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71055 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz --- Created attachment 38470 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38470=edit updated patch Well, DECL_P check is indeed superfluous, but I added to point out we are checking here for declarations.

[Bug c++/71024] Missing warning for contradictory attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71024 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 38469 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38469 suggested patch DECL_P check doesn't make sense, of course all VAR_Ps are also DECL_Ps, but no need to verify that.

[Bug debug/71057] [6 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 11 13:59:34 2016 New Revision: 236121 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236121=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-11 Richard Biener PR debug/71057

[Bug debug/71057] [6 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug driver/68463] Offloading fails when some objects are compiled with LTO and some without

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68463 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug target/70904] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fno-split-wide-types @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70904 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/71062] [7 regression] r235622 and restrict pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71062 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Summary|[bugzilla]

[Bug middle-end/71062] New: [bugzilla] r235622 and restrict pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71062 Bug ID: 71062 Summary: [bugzilla] r235622 and restrict pointers Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/70809] [AArch64] aarch64_vmls pattern should be rejected if -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70809 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/71050] [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c fails starting with r236066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On May 11, 2016 3:52:43 PM GMT+02:00, "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050 > >--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---

[Bug other/71064] New: nvptx offloading: "long double" data type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71064 Bug ID: 71064 Summary: nvptx offloading: "long double" data type Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/70830] [6/7 Regression] ARM interrupt attribute: push/pop do not support {reglist}^

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70830 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00395.html

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69979] ARM naked function attribute not handling structs bigger than 32 bits correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69979 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/71063] New: ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 Bug ID: 71063 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^" Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > Sure, and sorry for duplicated work. Now how to test this properly in > gcc.misc-tests/help.exp... Thanks. Ah, I was not aware of

[Bug fortran/56765] [OOP] compilation errors/ICE with polymorphic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765 --- Comment #6 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- On my environment, all tests compile now without an ICE. (also tested with several other compile options) $ gfortran-6 --version GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 6.1.1

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c++/71024] Missing warning for contradictory attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71024 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71065] New: Missing diagnostic for statements between OpenMP 'target' and 'teams'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71065 Bug ID: 71065 Summary: Missing diagnostic for statements between OpenMP 'target' and 'teams' Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug driver/71063] ICE: Segmentation fault with --help="^"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71063 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- FWIW, my fix was --- a/gcc/opts.c +++ b/gcc/opts.c @@ -1641,6 +1641,11 @@ common_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts, { ++ a; pflags = & exclude_flags; + if (*a == '\0')

[Bug other/71064] nvptx offloading: "long double" data type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71064 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov --- > (It's generally tuned for speed instead of precision, and does not strive for > full IEEE-754 conformance.) (PTX is an abstract ISA, if it's tuned for anything it's the simplicity of abstraction and

[Bug c++/71024] Missing warning for contradictory attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71024 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed May 11 17:07:37 2016 New Revision: 236129 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236129=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71024 * c-common.c (diagnose_mismatched_attributes): New

[Bug fortran/71066] New: ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 Bug ID: 71066 Summary: ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/71067] ICE on data initialization with insufficient value or wrong boz-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- A) correct with parameter : $ cat z3.f90 program p integer, parameter :: i = 0 integer :: z(2) data z /2*i/ print *, z end $ gfortran-6 z3.f90 $

[Bug fortran/71068] New: ICE in check_data_variable(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71068 Bug ID: 71068 Summary: ICE in check_data_variable(): Bad expression Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/57197] [Fortran-Dev][Regression] ICE in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:66

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- For me, test compiles now without ICE -- same with "use thing" added. $ gfortran-6 --version GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 6.1.1 20160502 [gcc-6-branch revision

[Bug fortran/71067] New: ICE on data initialization with insufficient value or wrong boz-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067 Bug ID: 71067 Summary: ICE on data initialization with insufficient value or wrong boz-constants Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/71062] [7 regression] r235622 and restrict pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71062 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I don't think it's valid to optimize for comparisons, where dereference doesn't occur, based on restrict; restrict is only about how an object is accessed (and as long as the object

[Bug c++/71069] New: Extend -Wnonnull-compare to address of reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71069 Bug ID: 71069 Summary: Extend -Wnonnull-compare to address of reference Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/71070] New: MPX gives a false positive when allocating a string longer than 16 bytes on the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71070 Bug ID: 71070 Summary: MPX gives a false positive when allocating a string longer than 16 bytes on the stack Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71069] -Waddress didn't catch all cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71069 --- Comment #1 from Eugene Zelenko --- Sorry for mistake in original report. -Waddress should report such problems.

[Bug tree-optimization/70876] ICE in chkp_find_bounds: Unexpected tree code with_size_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- Will you please check gcc 6.1 with your fix against bug 70877? I get an ICE, could it be a regression? gcc -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx gccerr36.c gccerr36.c: In function ‘bar’: gccerr36.c:12:8: warning:

[Bug tree-optimization/71006] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in conditional expression) w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160511 (experimental) [trunk revision 236116] (GCC) $: $: gcc-trunk -O1 small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1_BOUOUtg_1828_f2’: small.c:2:6

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Please note that this is the only target lib that fails for me. Others (like libgomp) are fine.

[Bug c/71074] New: combine.c in simplify_comparison sanitizer detects left shift of negative value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71074 Bug ID: 71074 Summary: combine.c in simplify_comparison sanitizer detects left shift of negative value Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/71074] combine.c in simplify_comparison sanitizer detects left shift of negative value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71074 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug c/43651] add warning for duplicate qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43651 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- The very same thing happens with gcc 6.1.1.

[Bug c/43651] add warning for duplicate qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43651 --- Comment #8 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Author: miyuki Date: Wed May 11 20:23:37 2016 New Revision: 236142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236142=gcc=rev Log: PR43651: add warning for duplicate qualifier gcc/c/ PR c/43651

[Bug rtl-optimization/70825] x86_64: __atomic_compare_exchange_n() accesses stack unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70825 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64, aarch64 |x86_64, aarch64, powerpc64* --- Comment

[Bug c++/71075] New: Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71075 Bug ID: 71075 Summary: Broken diagnostic: 'integer_cst' not supported by 'dump_decl' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/71076] New: Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71076 Bug ID: 71076 Summary: Internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug middle-end/71076] [6/7 Regression] error: missing PHI def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71076 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 --- Comment #10 from John Ettedgui --- I tried to rebuild my gcc with Kal's patch but it fails with this error: "make[6]: *** No rule to make target '../src/c++11/libc++11convenience.la', needed by 'libstdc++.la'. Stop." I don't understand

[Bug lto/71077] New: gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 Bug ID: 71077 Summary: gcc -lto raises ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 --- Comment #1 from Sergey --- Upd: with the reduced testcase the problem hid out after May 3; here is a bigger testcase which reveals it reliably : output_inline_function() { rest_of_compilation(); } *a; b, c, d, e; sched_analyze() { for (;

[Bug debug/71057] [6/7 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda "cannot call member function without object"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 Takatoshi Kondo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redboltz at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/71054] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:8097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71047] [7 Regression] Allocatable component of INTENT(OUT) dummy not set correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71047 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Works for me on gfortran 5.3.x, 6.1 with patch, and 7.0 with patch. > > at the options to use. YMMV. [Book15] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/gcc7p-235998/bin/gfortran pr71047.f90 [Book15] f90/bug% ./a.out

[Bug c++/71035] GCC does not give error on declaration of non literal type in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71035 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/71057] [6/7 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % cat fun_test.ii template using decay_t = _Tp; template struct A; template struct B { B(A); }; template struct C { template using constructor = B; typedef

[Bug tree-optimization/70916] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "tree_operand_check"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70916 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- The ICE is fixed, the second patch has been just an optimization, so shouldn't be backported, but for the last patch dunno, I believe it already had some follow up.

[Bug middle-end/70807] fwprop pass ICE with incoming CDI_DOMINATORS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug c/70255] change of the order of summation of floating point numbers despite no-associative-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 11 May 2016, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255 > > --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug debug/71058] ICE when building heavy templating and -std=c++17 -gstabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71059] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "vn_nary_op_insert_into"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71059 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >