[Bug tree-optimization/77544] [6 Regression] segfault at -O0 - infinite loop in simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 15 12:35:13 2016 New Revision: 240164 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240164=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-15 Richard Biener PR middle-end/77544

[Bug tree-optimization/77544] [6 Regression] segfault at -O0 - infinite loop in simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug c++/77597] GCC 6.2 / LLVM 3.9 name mangling discrepancy for function with instantiated template in signature whose template argument involves an ABI tag.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77597 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Well ABI tags are an extension on top of the IA64 C++ ABI and was first implemented by GCC.

[Bug rtl-optimization/77425] Pointer test follows dereference in sched-int.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77425 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 15 12:27:35 2016 New Revision: 240163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240163=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/77425 * sched-int.h (sd_iterator_cond): Don't

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77281] [ARM] Wrong code generated for move of constant vector with mix of signed and unsigned zeros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77281 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/77587] [5/6/7 Regression] C compiler produces incorrect stack alignment with __attribute__((weak))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/77597] New: GCC 6.2 / LLVM 3.9 name mangling discrepancy for function with instantiated template in signature whose template argument involves an ABI tag.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77597 Bug ID: 77597 Summary: GCC 6.2 / LLVM 3.9 name mangling discrepancy for function with instantiated template in signature whose template argument involves an ABI tag.

[Bug c++/77598] New: consexpr compilation failure on reference type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598 Bug ID: 77598 Summary: consexpr compilation failure on reference type casting Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/39170] provide an option to silence -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170 Albi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||albrecht.guendel at web dot de --- Comment #16

[Bug middle-end/77475] unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 15 12:26:39 2016 New Revision: 240162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240162=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77475 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/71436] [7 Regression] Segmentation fault in arm_output_multireg_pop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 --- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org --- Same failure of f951 after checking alternate svn apps.

[Bug c++/77601] New: error: cannot convert 'is_same<int, Z>' to 'const bool' in initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601 Bug ID: 77601 Summary: error: cannot convert 'is_same' to 'const bool' in initialization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77601] error: cannot convert 'is_same<int, Z>' to 'const bool' in initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601 --- Comment #1 from lh_mouse --- Oops, the last line in `main()` should have been constexpr bool b3 = is_same{}; And as the comment before that line says, it works with g++.

[Bug fortran/77596] New: [F03] procedure pointer with implicit interface in type pointing to a function can be 'called'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77596 Bug ID: 77596 Summary: [F03] procedure pointer with implicit interface in type pointing to a function can be 'called' Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 --- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Sep 15 16:31:35 2016 New Revision: 240166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240166=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77503 * tree-vect-loop.c

[Bug c++/77601] error: cannot convert 'is_same<int, Z>' to 'const bool' in initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67904] g++ crashes and asks for bugreport

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.2.1 --- Comment #5 from Thomas

[Bug c++/77598] constexpr compilation failure on reference type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/77600] M68K: gcc generates rubbish with -mshort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77600 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- warthog>m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/6.1.1/lto-wrapper Target: m68k-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/77522] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code C++14 code: in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:12447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/77600] New: M68K: gcc generates rubbish with -mshort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77600 Bug ID: 77600 Summary: M68K: gcc generates rubbish with -mshort Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r228471.

[Bug target/77599] M68K: __builtin_bswap32() isn't compiled correctly with -mshort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77599 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- warthog>m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/6.1.1/lto-wrapper Target: m68k-linux-gnu

[Bug target/77526] [7 Regression] ICE: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1039 with -mstringop-strategy=byte_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/77599] New: M68K: __builtin_bswap32() isn't compiled correctly with -mshort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77599 Bug ID: 77599 Summary: M68K: __builtin_bswap32() isn't compiled correctly with -mshort Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77603] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603 Bug ID: 77603 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (program f951) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/77605] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160915 (experimental) [trunk revision 240161] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk

[Bug middle-end/77606] New: abort in __memcpy_chk on an in-bounds copy with type-2 builtin_object_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77606 Bug ID: 77606 Summary: abort in __memcpy_chk on an in-bounds copy with type-2 builtin_object_size Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/77602] New: ICE with cyclic length declaration: Killed (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602 Bug ID: 77602 Summary: ICE with cyclic length declaration: Killed (program f951) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77603] ICE: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Still invalid with -fimplicit-none (or at source level), but done in no time (in contrast to pr77602) : $ time gfortran-7-20160911 -fimplicit-none -c z1.f90

[Bug fortran/47915] Type declaration: Recursive specification expression not detected.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47915 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/77602] ICE with cyclic length declaration: Killed (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Adding -fimplicit-none does not help : $ time gfortran-7-20160911 -fimplicit-none -c z1.f90 gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

[Bug fortran/77604] ICE in get_frame_type, at tree-nested.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77604 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- A "scalar" version works : $ cat y1.f90 program p call s contains function f(x, y) result(z) character(*), intent(in) :: x, y

[Bug fortran/77604] New: ICE in get_frame_type, at tree-nested.c:208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77604 Bug ID: 77604 Summary: ICE in get_frame_type, at tree-nested.c:208 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/77606] abort in __memcpy_chk on an in-bounds copy with type-2 builtin_object_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77606 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- The following test case reduces the problem to __builtin_object_size failing for pointers to objects that are the result of a __builtin_malloc call (or VLA definition) with an argument that's a runtime

[Bug fortran/77602] ICE with cyclic length declaration: Killed (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug inline-asm/77607] New: Aarch64 LDP operand rejected incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607 Bug ID: 77607 Summary: Aarch64 LDP operand rejected incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/77608] New: missing protection on trivially detectable runtime buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608 Bug ID: 77608 Summary: missing protection on trivially detectable runtime buffer overflow Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/70090] add non-constant variant of __builtin_object_size for _FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fsanitize=object-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/77607] Aarch64 LDP operand rejected incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/77607] Aarch64 LDP operand rejected incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607 hyc at symas dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #2 from hyc at

[Bug fortran/69963] ICE out of memory on displaced implicit character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69963 --- Comment #3 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: lkrupp Date: Thu Sep 15 23:54:40 2016 New Revision: 240168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240168=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-15 Louis Krupp PR

[Bug target/77610] New: [sh] memcpy is wrongly inlined even for large copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77610 Bug ID: 77610 Summary: [sh] memcpy is wrongly inlined even for large copies Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/66835] C++ openMP test failed after switching to C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this has been fixed, can you try again?

[Bug other/77609] New: __attribute__((section(".note.foo"))) forces SHT_PROGBITS though the assembler would use SHT_NOTE

.size foonote, 24 foonote: .long 7 .long 2 .long 17 .string "foobar" .zero 1 .value 23 .zero 2 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0

[Bug middle-end/77608] missing protection on trivially detectable runtime buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69963] ICE out of memory on displaced implicit character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69963 lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77608] missing protection on trivially detectable runtime buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.3, 5.3.0, 6.2.0, 7.0 --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/77612] New: ICE on invalid character len in contained procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77612 Bug ID: 77612 Summary: ICE on invalid character len in contained procedure Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/77609] __attribute__((section(".note.foo"))) forces SHT_PROGBITS though the assembler would use SHT_NOTE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77609 --- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org --- Created attachment 39626 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39626=edit trunk fix This is the fix that shows the behavior difference reported above.

[Bug middle-end/77594] double computation for __builtin_sub_overflow (0, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77594 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/77594] double computation for __builtin_sub_overflow (0, ...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77594 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #10 from Yu Xuanchi --- So there is currently i'm working on: -Add "OVERLOAD" tree or just use chain. So we can put all function with same identifier overloaded in a same tree so we can obtain them use build_external_ref. -Find a way

[Bug c++/77595] New: concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595 Bug ID: 77595 Summary: concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0

[Bug tree-optimization/77544] [6/7 Regression] segfault at -O0 - infinite loop in simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The issue is inconsistent folding done by associates split_tree when facing ~X vs -X - 1. I have a patch.

[Bug c++/77588] Internal error triggered by __builtin___chkp_bndret

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77588 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/67111] ld -plugin segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67111 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||armv6kz-hardfloat-linux-gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/66890] function splitting only works with profile feedback

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug bootstrap/77593] [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with configure-target-libgfortran " cygwin64 Windows 10 anniversary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 15 07:17:45 2016 New Revision: 240153 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240153=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-15 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug bootstrap/11660] libffi only builds when java is selected as language

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11660 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77503] [7 regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt compiling postgresql

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63581] undefined references in debug_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77595] concepts: constrained member functions illegally instantiated during explicit class template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595 --- Comment #1 from Andrzej Krzemienski --- I mean, the expectation is that member functions whose constraints are not satisfied should be omitted during explicit class template instantiation. See this discussion for more background:

[Bug sanitizer/77567] ASAN: Bugus error "alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete [])" with C++17's over-aligned types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > Created attachment 39612 [details] > > pr77567-2.patch > > > > Slightly larger patch, which attempts to

[Bug c/66683] Large macro with float multiplications fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66683 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Here is the testcase just in case github ever goes down: #include #include #define TEST

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/72743] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743 --- Comment #9 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Sep 15 10:00:14 2016 New Revision: 240156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240156=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-15 Chung-Lin Tang Backport from

[Bug target/77587] [5/6/7 Regression] C compiler produces incorrect stack alignment with __attribute__((weak))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/63743] Thumb1: big regression for float operators by r216728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/72743] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743 --- Comment #8 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Sep 15 09:46:36 2016 New Revision: 240155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240155=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-15 Chung-Lin Tang PR fortran/72743

[Bug testsuite/77411] object-size-9.c -fpic -m32 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > So DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr doesn't work here? Not sure > I understand how DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr works fully. That is, > > ... *(D#1 + 24) >